Microfiltration MF

Physical sieving is believed to be the major rejection mechanism for MF with water convecting through the membrane due to an applied transmembrane pressure. The deposit or cake on the membrane can act as a self-rejecting layer, and retain even smaller particles or solutes than would be expected to be removed given the pore size of the membrane ( dynamic membrane ). Thus a fouled MF membrane may have UF rejection characterisncs and flux may decline significantly due to the build-up of this deposit. 

Electrostatic interactions, dispersion forces, and hydrophobic bonding may play some role in rejection. Little is known about effects such as particle adhesion, deposit compressibility, particle shape, and particle mixtures. 

Pure water flux under laminar conditions through a tortuous porous harrier may be described, according to Carman (1938) and Bowen and Jenner (1995), by equation (3.4). 

AP is the transmembrane pressure difference, n the dynamic solvent viscosity, and Rm the clean membrane resistance (i.e. the porous barrier). Units of the symbols arc explained in the symbols section at the end of this thesis. 

The Resistance in Series Model describes the flux of a fouled membrane. This is given in equation (3.4). The resistances Ra , Ri and Rc denote the additional resistances which result from the exposure of the membrane to a solution containing particles or solute. Rcp is the resistance due to concentration polarisation, Ri the internal pore fouling resistance, and Rc the resistance due to external deposition or cake formation. These resistances are usually negligible in RO, where the osmotic pressure effects become more important (Fane (1997)). However, the osmotic pressure can also be incorporated into Rcp. 

---

Pores Even porous membranes can give very high selectivity. Molecular sieve membranes exist that give excellent separation factors for gases. Their commercial scale preparation is a formidable obstacle. At the other extreme, UF,3 separations use Knudsen flow barriers, with aveiy low separation factor. Microfiltration (MF) and iiltrafiltra-tion (UF) membranes are clearly porous, their pores ranging in size from 3 nm to 3 [Lm. Nanofiltration (NF) meiTibranes have smaller pores. 

Process Description Microfiltration (MF) separates particles from true solutions, be they liquid or gas phase. Alone among the membrane processes, microfiltration may be accomplished without the use of a membrane. The usual materi s retained by a microfiltra-tion membrane range in size from several [Lm down to 0.2 [Lm. At the low end of this spectrum, very large soluble macromolecules are retained by a microfilter. Bacteria and other microorganisms are a particularly important class of particles retained by MF membranes. Among membrane processes, dead-end filtration is uniquely common to MF, but cross-flow configurations are often used. 

Membranes used for the pressure driven separation processes, microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF) and reverse osmosis (RO), as well as those used for dialysis, are most commonly made of polymeric materials. Initially most such membranes were cellulosic in nature. These ate now being replaced by polyamide, polysulphone, polycarbonate and several other advanced polymers. These synthetic polymers have improved chemical stability and better resistance to microbial degradation. Membranes have most commonly been produced by a form of phase inversion known as immersion precipitation.11 This process has four main steps ... 

An survey of recent developments in membrane processes, involving reverse osmosis (RO), ultrafiltration (UF), microfiltration (MF), electrodialysis (ED), dialysis (D), pervaporation (Pr), gas permeation (GP), and emulsion liquid membrane (ELM), has been provided by Sirkar (1997). 

Recently, membrane filtration has become popular for treating industrial effluent. Membrane filtration includes microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF), and reverse... 

The development of industrial inorganic ultrafiltration (UF) and microfiltration (MF) membranes resulted from the combination of three factors ... 

Microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) membranes can be used as forms of pretreatment for nanofiltration (ISIF) or reverse osmosis (RO) desalination processes. Membrane pretreatment reduces the amount of chemicals that are required and hence reduces the environmental impact of the final discharge. MF membranes can be used to filter particles with diameters of 0.1-10 pmm and typically remove bacteria, viruses, precipitates, coagulates and large colloidal particles. UF can remove particles with diameters as small as 0.002 pm, and... 

Microfiltration (MF) pressure difference filtration of cell suspensions blood plasma recovery... 

Generally, a distinction can be made between membrane bioreactors based on cells performing a desired conversion and processes based on enzymes. In ceU-based processes, bacteria, plant and mammalian cells are used for the production of (fine) chemicals, pharmaceuticals and food additives or for the treatment of waste streams. Enzyme-based membrane bioreactors are typically used for the degradation of natural polymeric materials Hke starch, cellulose or proteins or for the resolution of optically active components in the pharmaceutical, agrochemical, food and chemical industry [50, 51]. In general, only ultrafiltration (UF) or microfiltration (MF)-based processes have been reported and little is known on the application of reverse osmosis (RO) or nanofiltration (NF) in membrane bioreactors. Additionally, membrane contactor systems have been developed, based on micro-porous polyolefin or teflon membranes [52-55]. 

Process Microfiltration (MF) Ultrafiltration (UF) Nanoiiltration (NF) Reverse Osmosis (RO)... 

Colloidal materials present in surface waters can also plug RO membranes, causing a decrease in permeate flux. Colloidal plugging can be avoided by using one of several possible pretreatment steps. Ultrafiltration (qv) (UF) or microfiltration (MF), depending on the size of the colloid, can be used to filter out the colloidal material. Alternatively, a coagulant such as alum can be added to the water to form aggregates of the colloid, which can then be filtered in a similar manner as suspended solids. 

In bioprocesses, a variety of apparatus that incorporate artificial (usually polymeric) membranes are often used for both separations and bioreactions. In this chapter, we shall briefly review the general principles of several membrane processes, namely, dialysis, ultrafiltration (UF), microfiltration (MF), and reverse osmosis (RO). 

Among the numerous approaches studied so far to minimize such phenomena in ED, it is worth citing pretreatment of the feed solution by coagulation (De Korosy et al., 1970) or microfiltration (MF) or ultrafiltration membrane processing (Ferrarini, 2001 Lewandowski et al., 1999 Pinacci et al., 2004), turbulence in the compartments, optimization of the process conditions, as well as modification of the membrane properties (Grebenyuk et al., 1998). However, all these methods are partially effective and hydraulic or chemical cleaning-in-place (CIP) is still needed today, thus... 

Cross-section structure. An anisotropic membrane (also called asymmetric ) has a thin porous or nonporous selective barrier, supported mechanically by a much thicker porous substructure. This type of morphology reduces the effective thickness of the selective barrier, and the permeate flux can be enhanced without changes in selectivity. Isotropic ( symmetric ) membrane cross-sections can be found for self-supported nonporous membranes (mainly ion-exchange) and macroporous microfiltration (MF) membranes (also often used in membrane contactors [1]). The only example for an established isotropic porous membrane for molecular separations is the case of track-etched polymer films with pore diameters down to about 10 run. All the above-mentioned membranes can in principle be made from one material. In contrast to such an integrally anisotropic membrane (homogeneous with respect to composition), a thin-film composite (TFC) membrane consists of different materials for the thin selective barrier layer and the support structure. In composite membranes in general, a combination of two (or more) materials with different characteristics is used with the aim to achieve synergetic properties. Other examples besides thin-film are pore-filled or pore surface-coated composite membranes or mixed-matrix membranes [3]. 

Microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) involve contacting the upstream face ofa porous membrane with a feed stream containing particles or macromolecules (B) suspended in a low molecular weight fluid (A). The pores are simply larger in MF membranes than for UF membranes. In either case, a transmembrane pressure difference motivates the suspending fluid (usually water) to pass through physically observable permanent pores in the membrane. The fluid flow drags suspended particles and macrosolutes to the surface of the membrane where they are rejected due to their excessive size relative to the membrane pores. This simple process... 

Most tubular membrane modules are used for specialty microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) applications rather than RO due to the lower packing density of this type of module and because MF and UF typically treat higher-solids feed water (see Chapter 16.1). 

Membrane pretreatment includes microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), and nanofiltration (NF). Microfiltration and UF membrane processes can remove microbes and algae. However, the pores of MF and UF membranes are too large to remove the smaller, low-molecular weight organics that provide nutrients for microbes. As a result, MF and UF can remove microbes in the source water, but any microbes that are introduced downstream of these membranes will have nutrients to metabolize. Therefore, chlorination along with MF and UF is often recommended to minimize the potential for microbial fouling of RO membranes. The MF or UF membranes used should be chlorine resistant to tolerate chlorine treatment. It is suggested that chlorine be fed prior to the MF or UF membrane and then after the membrane (into the clearwell), with dechlorination just prior to the RO membranes. See Chapter 16.1 for additional discussion about MF and UF membranes for RO pretreatment. 

In this chapter, the impact of other membrane technologies on the operation of RO systems is discussed. Technologies considered include microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), and nanofiltration (NF) as pretreatment to RO, and continuous electrodeionization (CEDI) as post-treatment to RO. This chapter also describes the HERO (high efficiency RO—Debasish Mukhopadhyay patent holder, 1999) process used to generate high purity water from water that is difficult to treat, such as water containing high concentrations of silica. 

---