Microelectrodes noise

The electrode arrangement and dimensions are displayed in Fig. 5-4. The two rotating electric contacts (disk and microelectrode) are ensured by two mercury contactors [58], allowing the EHD impedance to be measured under satisfactory signal-to-noise conditions. The system Fe(CN)g /Fe(CN)ft in the reduction direction was used. 

Weber S. Signal-to-noise ratio in microelectrode-array-based electrochemical detectors. Analytical Chemistry 1989, 61, 295-302. 

The main limitation to the use of microelectrode voltammetry is the need to measure small DC currents without noise interference. This usually requires that measurements be done in a Faraday cage (a shield against electronic noise). Recent reviews give good insight into the theory and application of microelec-trode voltammetry.48-51... 

It is also possible to employ detectors with solutions flowing over a static mercury drop electrode or a carbon fiber microelectrode, or to use flow-through electrodes, with the electrode simply an open tube or porous matrix. The latter can offer complete electrolysis, namely, coulometric detection. The extremely small dimensions of ultramicroelectrodes (discussed in Section 4.5.4) offer the advantages of flow-rate independence (and hence a low noise level) and operation in nonconductive mobile phases (such as those of normal-phase chromatography or supercritical fluid chromatography). 

Patch clamping requires that an electrode, housed within a micropipette, is attached to the cell to make an almost perfect seal with the cell membrane. This generates a very high resistance between the cell and the pipette wall, typically 10 CA2. The resulting transmembrane currents, measured between microelectrodes inside and outside the cell, generate extremely low noise so single channel events can be... 

The choice between galvanostatic and potentiostatic measurements depends on circumstances. From the instrumentation point of view, galvanostats are much simpler than potentiostats. This is not only a matter of cost, but also a matter of performance. Thus, where it is desired to measure very low currents (e.g., on single microelectrodes), a battery with a variable resistor may be all that is needed to set up a low-noise galvanostat. At the other extreme, when large currents must be passed — for instance, in an industrial pilot plant for electrosynthesis - power supplies delivering controllable currents in the range of hundreds of amperes are readily available, whereas potentiostats of comparable output are either nonexistent or extremely expensive. 

This prevents water penetration and only the exterior of the electrode is exposed to electrolytes. When used with 30 nm sized carbon black powder, the conductive area of the electrode in contact with the electrolyte consists of less than 1 % of the geometric cross-sectional area of the electrode. This has been compared with an ensemble of microelectrodes. These CCEs showed an improvement of up to three orders of magnitude in terms of Faradaic signal-to-noise compared with glassy carbon electrodes [218]. In addition, the sol gel method of preparation affords a variety of structural configurations and it has been shown that CCEs can be produced by thick film and ink jet technology, which allows for their mass production [219]. 

In microelectrode potentiometric measurements, a very noisy voltage output can be expected without appropriate shielding. One can check the electrode condition by hand-waving close to the cell. An absence of noise spikes indicates an electrode failure. 

Development of model based DBS techniques exploiting the methods of nonlinear dynamics and statistical physics was pioneered by P. A. Tass, who proposed a number of approaches. The main idea of these approaches is that suppression of the pathological rhythm should be achieved in such a way that (i) activity of individual units is not suppressed, but only their firing becomes asynchronous, and (ii) the stimulation should be minimized, e.g., it is desirable to switch it off as soon as the synchrony is suppressed (see [48, 49] and references therein). Following these ideas we suggested in our previous publications [40, 41] a delayed feedback suppression control scheme (Fig. 13.5), cf. delayed and non-delayed techniques for stabilization of lowdimensional systems [5, 22, 39] and for control of noise-induced motion [24]. In our approach it is assumed that the collective activity of many neurons is reflected in the local field potential (LFP) which can be registered by an extracellular microelectrode. Delayed and amplified LFP signal can be fed back into the systems via the second or same electrode (see [37] and references therein for a description of one electrode measurement -stimulation setup.) Numerical simulation as well as analytical analysis of the delayed feedback control demonstrate that it indeed can be exploited for suppression of the collective synchrony. 

This technique allows the study of single-ion channels as well as whole-cell ion channel currents. Essentially, the patch-clamp technique is an improved and refined version of the voltage-clamp technique. It requires a low electrical noise borosiUcate glass electrode, also known as a patch electrode or patch pipette, with a relatively large tip (>1 pm) that has a smooth surface rather than a sharp tip as with the conventional microelectrodes. This is a major difference between the patch electrode and the sharp electrode used to impale cells directly through the cell membrane (Figure 16.20). 

Amperometric electrodes made on a microscale, on the order of 5 to 30 /rm diameter possess a number of advantages. The electrode is smaller than the diffusion layer thickness. This results in enhanced mass transport that is independent of flow, and an increased signal-to-noise ratio, and electrochemical measurements can be made in high-resistance media, such as nonaqueous solvents. An S-shaped sigmoid current-voltage curve is recorded in a quiet solution instead of a peak shaped curve because of the independence on the diffusion layer. The hmiting current, q, of such microelectrodes is given by... 

Figure 8 is a block diagram of a typical two-electrode configuration for making microelectrode measurements where the function generator and recorder could, of course, be replaced by a microcomputer with appropriate interfaces. To minimize noise, the cell is mounted in a Faraday cage and cables are kept as short as possible. Using a system of this type, noise-free measurements of steady-state currents as small as 10 12 A have been made... 

This relation was proved by Nyquist (10) to be a consequence of basic thermodynamics laws and, except for quantum corrections, was never really challenged. Studies performed with glass microelectrodes (II) and heterogeneous ionic systems (12) showed that for zero ionic gradients and zero applied currents, the measured levels of noise were in agreement with noise levels calculated from the impedance according to eq 1. Hence, a study of electrical noise of a system under equilibrium conditions can be initiated for only two reasons. First, if there is some a priori information that the system is in equilibrium, then measurements of the system impedance or temperature can be performed without external perturbations (quantum effects are not considered here). Second, if impedance and temperature are measured independently by some other techniques, noise measurements can verify that the system under study is in an equilibrium state. 

An excellent review of the early history of noise studies of different ionic systems, such as single pores in thin dielectric films, microelectrodes, and synthetic membranes, is reference 3. The review by Weissman (48) describes several state-of-the-art fluctuation spectroscopy methods that include (1) determination of chemical kinetics from conductivity fluctuations in salt solutions, (2) observation of conductivity noise that arises from enthalpy fluctuations in the electrolyte with high temperature coefficient of resistivity, and (3) detection of large conductivity fluctuations in a binary mixture near its critical point. 

Instead of employing a single electrode, an array of electrodes [67] or an inter-digitated electrode [68] may be used to study electrochemical systems. Similar to advantages achieved by variations in electrode geometry, the use of several communicating electrodes poised at the same or different potentials opens up new possibilities for the study of the properties or the kinetics of chemical systems. An interesting development is the random assemblies of microelectrodes (RAM) (see Fig. II. 1.14), which promises the experimental timescale of microelectrodes but with considerably improved current-to-noise levels [69]. 

---