Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Method requirements

The calculation of the properties of mixtures by modern methods requires that the composition be known and that the component parameters have been determined previously. [Pg.109]

The algebraic methods of reconstruction give result at incomplete and complete set of initial projection data. But the iterative imhlementation of these methods requires large computing resources. Algebraic method can be used in cases, when the required accuracy is not great. [Pg.219]

C. Methods Requiring Knowledge of the Surface Free Energy or Total Energy... [Pg.576]

Abstract. The overall Hamiltonian structure of the Quantum-Classical Molecular Dynamics model makes - analogously to classical molecular dynamics - symplectic integration schemes the methods of choice for long-term simulations. This has already been demonstrated by the symplectic PICKABACK method [19]. However, this method requires a relatively small step-size due to the high-frequency quantum modes. Therefore, following related ideas from classical molecular dynamics, we investigate symplectic multiple-time-stepping methods and indicate various possibilities to overcome the step-size limitation of PICKABACK. [Pg.412]

This method, due to Middleton (Analyst, 1935, 6o, 154), has the advantage over Lassaigne s method (pp. 321-326) that the use of metallic sodium is avoided it has the disadvantage, however, that the reagents are not so readily obtained pure, and the method requires rather more time. [Pg.326]

For simplicity, we define T - and T (A iooTe/At). As explained by Luo and Tanner (1989), the decoupled method requires a suitable variable transfonna-tion in the governing equations (3.20) and (3.21). This is to ensure that the discrete momentum equations always contain the real viscous term required to recover the Newtonian velocity-pressure formulation when Ws approaches zero. This is achieved by decomposing the extra stress T as... [Pg.82]

All of the above methods require the evaluation of one- and two-eleetron integrals over the N atomie orbital basis <%a flXb> and - Eventually, all of these methods provide their working equations and energy expressions in terms of one- and two-eleetron integrals over the N final moleeular orbitals <(l)i fl(l)j> and <(l)i(l)j g (l)k(l)i>. [Pg.485]

Each of these tools has advantages and limitations. Ab initio methods involve intensive computation and therefore tend to be limited, for practical reasons of computer time, to smaller atoms, molecules, radicals, and ions. Their CPU time needs usually vary with basis set size (M) as at least M correlated methods require time proportional to at least M because they involve transformation of the atomic-orbital-based two-electron integrals to the molecular orbital basis. As computers continue to advance in power and memory size, and as theoretical methods and algorithms continue to improve, ab initio techniques will be applied to larger and more complex species. When dealing with systems in which qualitatively new electronic environments and/or new bonding types arise, or excited electronic states that are unusual, ab initio methods are essential. Semi-empirical or empirical methods would be of little use on systems whose electronic properties have not been included in the data base used to construct the parameters of such models. [Pg.519]

Unfortunately, these methods require more technical sophistication on the part of the user. This is because there is no completely automated way to choose which configurations are in the calculation (called the active space). The user must determine which molecular orbitals to use. In choosing which orbitals to include, the user should ensure that the bonding and corresponding antibonding orbitals are correlated. The orbitals that will yield the most correlation... [Pg.24]

One disadvantage is that the lower levels of theory must be able to describe all atoms in the inner regions of the molecule. Thus, this method cannot be used to incorporate a metal atom into a force field that is not parameterized for it. The effect of one region of the molecule causing polarization of the electron density in the other region of the molecule is incorporated only to the extent that the lower levels of theory describe polarization. This method requires more CPU time than most of the others mentioned. However, the extra time should be minimal since it is due to lower-level calculations on smaller sections of the system. [Pg.201]

The next step is to obtain geometries for the molecules. Crystal structure geometries can be used however, it is better to use theoretically optimized geometries. By using the theoretical geometries, any systematic errors in the computation will cancel out. Furthermore, the method will predict as yet unsynthesized compounds using theoretical geometries. Some of the simpler methods require connectivity only. [Pg.244]

Solubility Considerations An accurate precipitation gravimetric method requires that the precipitate s solubility be minimal. Many total analysis techniques can routinely be performed with an accuracy of better than 0.1%. To obtain this level of accuracy, the isolated precipitate must account for at least 99.9% of the analyte. By extending this requirement to 99.99% we ensure that accuracy is not limited by the precipitate s solubility. [Pg.235]

The analysis for I using the Volhard method requires a back titration. A typical calculation is shown in the following example. [Pg.356]

Atomic emission is used for the analysis of the same types of samples that may be analyzed by atomic absorption. The development of a quantitative atomic emission method requires several considerations, including choosing a source for atomization and excitation, selecting a wavelength and slit width, preparing the sample for analysis, minimizing spectral and chemical interferences, and selecting a method of standardization. [Pg.437]

DNA from a gene contains hundreds to thousands of nucleotide units for which the sequence is needed in order to interpret its code. Sequencing methods require only small amounts (5 (tg) of purified DNA, which can be produced by cloning. Automated sequencers are available that can daily sequence DNA containing hundreds of nucleotide units. [Pg.329]

From the radioactive decay constants and measurement of the amount of argon in a rock sample, the length of time since formation of the rock can be estimated. Essentially, the dating method requires fusion of a rock sample under high vacuum to release the argon gas that has collected through radioactive decay of potassium. The amount of argon is determined mass spectrometrically,... [Pg.368]

Protein-Based Adhesives. Proteia-based adhesives are aormaHy used as stmctural adhesives they are all polyamino acids that are derived from blood, fish skin, caseia [9000-71 -9] soybeans, or animal hides, bones, and connective tissue (coUagen). Setting or cross-linking methods typically used are iasolubilization by means of hydrated lime and denaturation. Denaturation methods require energy which can come from heat, pressure, or radiation, as well as chemical denaturants such as carbon disulfide [75-15-0] or thiourea [62-56-6]. Complexiag salts such as those based upon cobalt, copper, or chromium have also been used. Formaldehyde and formaldehyde donors such as h exam ethyl en etetra am in e can be used to form cross-links. Removal of water from a proteia will also often denature the material. [Pg.234]

Ferromanganese is produced iu blast fiimaces and electric smelting fiimaces. Economics usually determine which smelting process is chosen for ferromanganese. Both methods require about the same amount of coke for reduction to metal, but iu the case of the blast fiimace, the thermal energy required for the smelting process is suppHed by the combustion of additional coke, which iu most countries is a more expensive form of energy than electricity. [Pg.492]

Red mercuric oxide generally is prepared in one of two ways by the heat-induced decomposition of mercuric nitrate or by hot precipitation. Both methods require careful control of reaction conditions. In the calcination method, mercury and an equivalent of hot, concentrated nitric acid react to form... [Pg.113]


See other pages where Method requirements is mentioned: [Pg.218]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.1460]    [Pg.2334]    [Pg.2335]    [Pg.2353]    [Pg.2355]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.640]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.454]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.70 , Pg.74 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.27 ]




SEARCH



Analysis method requirements

Analytical Method Requirements

Analytical method validation regulatory requirements

Analytical methods legislative requirements

Application method manufacturing requirements

Confirmatory method performance requirements

Current requirement method

Defining the Scope and Method Requirements

Design methods data requirements

General Requirements upon the Methods for Calculating Potential Energy Surfaces

General requirements to analytical methods for compliance testing

HPLC methods requirements

Method definition requirement

Method definition requirement document

Methods Requiring Sample Pretreatment

Multicomponent distillation short-cut methods for stage and reflux requirements

Protocol, method validation accuracy requirements

Protocol, method validation precision requirements

Requirements for Method Type

Requirements for validating a residue method

Requirements of The Method

Reversed-phase liquid chromatography required method performance

Sample Availability vs Method Requirements

Screening method performance requirements

Soil Sample Preparation for Methods That Do Not Require Extensive Treatment

Synthetic library methods requiring deconvolution

Testing methods experimental design requirements

Testing methods furnace materials requirements

Testing methods industrial requirements

Validation requirements of the method

© 2024 chempedia.info