Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Methanation catalysts poisoning

Catalyst Poisons. Hausberger, Atwood, and Knight (33) reported that nickel catalysts are extremely sensitive to sulfides and chlorides. If all materials which adversely affect the performance of a catalyst were classified as poisons, then carbon laydown and, under extreme conditions, water vapor would be included as nickel methanation catalyst poisons. [Pg.25]

Most commercial methanator catalysts contain nickel, supported on alumina, kaolin, or calcium aluminate cement. Sulfur and arsenic are poisons to the catalyst, which can also be fouled by carry-over of solvent from the CO2 removal system. [Pg.350]

Remaining trace quantities of CO (which would poison the iron catalyst during ammonia synthesis) are converted back to CH4 by passing the damp gas from the scmbbers over a Ni methanation catalyst at 325° CO -t- 3H2, CRt -t- H2O. This reaction is the reverse of that occurring in the primary steam reformer. The synthesis gas now emerging has the approximate composition H2 74.3%, N2 24.7%, CH4 0.8%, Ar 0.3%, CO 1 -2ppm. It is compressed in three stages from 25 atm to 200 atm and then passed over a promoted iron catalyst at 380-450°C ... [Pg.421]

Nickel. As a methanation catalyst, nickel is presently preeminent. It is relatively cheap, it is very active, and it is the most selective to methane of all the metals. Its main drawback is that it is easily poisoned by sulfur, a fault common to all the known active methanation catalysts. The nickel content of commercial nickel catalysts is 25-77 wt %. Nickel is dispersed on a high-surface-area, refractory support such as alumina or kieselguhr. Some supports inhibit the formation of carbon by Reaction 4. Chromia-supported nickel has been studied by Czechoslovakian and Russian investigators. [Pg.23]

A good methanation catalyst is one which is physically strong, is reducible at 300°C (570°F) and has high activity. In order to provide a long life, it must retain these properties in use. Lives of 3-5 years are commonly obtained from charges of Imperial Chemical Industries, Ltd. (ICI) catalyst 11-3, depending on the temperature of operation and the presence of poisons in the synthesis gas, factors which are discussed below. These properties can be obtained by careful attention to the formulation and manufacture of the catalyst. [Pg.81]

The poisons most likely to be encountered in an ammonia plant are those originating in the C02-removal system which precedes the metha-nator. Carry-over of a small amount of liquid into the methanator, which is almost inevitable, is not normally serious. Plant malfunction, however, can sometimes result in large quantities of C02-removal liquor being pumped over the catalyst, and this can be very deleterious. Table I lists the effects of common C02-removal liquors on methanation catalyst activity. [Pg.87]

Anonymous What else can we say about the poisoning of methanation catalysts by materials other than sulfur, e.g., any information in... [Pg.171]

If the gasifier product stream is intended for downstream use as the feedstock for further upgrading such as methanation, methanol or Fischer Tropsch synthesis, very thorough desulphuri-sation is essential since the catalysts in these upgrading processes are highly sensitive to sulphur poisoning. The methanation catalysts normally cannot tolerate more than 0.05 ppm of sulphur in the feedstock. In addition to H2S sulphur values in the gasifier product it may contain COS, CS2, mercaptans and thiophenes. These are normally removed by activated carbon or zinc oxide filters ahead of the sensitive synthesis catalyst beds. [Pg.56]

The purification step in the route 1 approach removes all of the H2S and COS in the raw product gas from the gasifier in addition to the carbon dioxide. Sulfur acts as a catalyst poison to Fischer-Tropsch, methanation and methanol catalyst systems, so pure sulfur-free gases must be used in these synthesis reactions. [Pg.87]

More recently, there has been much concern about the possible effects of the mineral matter in coal on processes used to convert coal to other fuels such as gasification, liquefaction, and production of clean solid fuels. Not only is removing and disposing of the mineral matter a problem, but also the possible chemical effects such as catalyst poisoning, which might be expected in the methanation of gas from coal, should be considered. [Pg.10]

Methanation catalysts are not usually deactivated by thermal sintering. The principal reason for any loss of activity is poisoning. Sulfur compounds will poison methanation catalysts, but sulfur is not present unless the low temperature shift catalyst is by-passed. The poisons most likely to occur under normal operating conditions are those originating from the carbon dioxide removal system that precedes the methanator. Carry-over of a small amount of liquid into the methanator is not serious. Large volumes of liquid will have a... [Pg.157]

When only potassium carbonate or organic solvents are used, the effects are less important. Potassium carbonate blocks the catalyst pores, and can be removed by washing with water to restore normal performance. Methanation catalysts can be protected from poisons by installing a guard bed of zinc oxide absorbent. This will remove traces of sulfur and droplets of liquid from the carbon dioxide removal system70. [Pg.158]

If the makeup gas to the ammonia synthesis loop is absolutely free of catalyst poisons, such as H2O and C02, it can flow directly to the ammonia synthesis converter. This leads to the most favorable arrangement from a minimum energy point of view. This can be accomplished by allowing the gas that leaves the methanation step to pass through beds of molecular sieves to remove water and traces of C02 74... [Pg.161]

Based on the results of Dalla Betta and co-workers, it is clear that the steady-state activity of a completely sulfur-poisoned Ni or Ru methanation catalyst is 102-104 times lower than that of the fresh catalyst. However, a typical industrial methanation process would more probably involve a catalyst only partly poisoned by sulfur. Bartholomew and co-workers (23, 113, 157) attempted to assess how sulfur poisoning of only a portion of the catalyst would affect its activity/selectivity properties in fixed-bed and fluidized-bed reactors. Data in Table XII show the effects on specific activity and product distribution of partially presulfided Co/A1203 and Ni/Al203 catalysts in a fixed bed. Catalysts were presulfided with 10 ppm H2S at 725 K, and reaction was carried out with sulfur-free feedgas. Corresponding data are listed in Table XIII for catalysts partially presulfided and then studied in a fluidized-bed reactor under the same conditions. The decrease in H2 uptake... [Pg.195]

Three different Cr-Co spinels were prepared and tested as catalysts for the oxidation of methane in the presence of SO2, a typical catalyst poison. The spinels were prepared from nitrate precursors using a co-precipitation method, followed by calcining at three different temperatures, (400, 600 and 800 °C) for 5 hours. Characterisation results indicate that the catalyst calcined at 800 C presents a structure of pure spinel, whereas the presence of single oxides is observed in the catalyst calcined at 600 C, and the catalysts calcined at 400 C presents a very complex structure (probably a mixture of several single and binary oxides). Experiments show an important influence of calcining temperature on the catalyst performance. In absence of SO2, catalysts calcined at 400"C and 600 C performs similarly, whereas the activity of the catalysts calcined at 800 C is worse. When sulphur compounds were added to the feed, catalyst calcined at 600"C deactivated faster than the other two catalysts. [Pg.427]

Two different cerium oxide promoted zirconias were prepared and tested as supports for Pd catalysts for the catalytic oxidation of methane, alone and in presence of a strong catalyst poison (SO2). The introduction of cerium oxide was carried out by incipient wetness of zirconium hydroxide or zirconium oxide, followed by calcination. Both catalysts present very different properties, the first method producing a catalyst with better performance, and thermal stability markedly higher than the unmodified zirconia support. However, the addition of cerium does not lead to any enhancement of the catalyst performance in presence ofSC>2,... [Pg.907]

Reversibility of these poisons depends on process conditions. Sulfur-poisoning of nickel catalysts, for example, is irreversible at lower temperatures. Methanation catalysts beds cannot be regenerated even with... [Pg.209]


See other pages where Methanation catalysts poisoning is mentioned: [Pg.446]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.1541]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.1363]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.1845]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.212]   


SEARCH



Catalyst poison

Catalysts catalyst poisoning

Catalysts methane

Catalysts poisoning

Methanation Catalyst

Methanation poisons

Poisoned catalysts

© 2024 chempedia.info