Metal oxide-adsorbate interactions about

As already mentioned, the electronic interactions involved at the metal oxide-adsorbate interface have not been studied nearly as extensively as, for example, metal surfaces. Some notable experimental progress has, however, taken place in the last few years, see e.g. [101, 102], and some relevant theoretical models have recently been proposed [103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108]. However, little is known about the perhaps single most important factor determining the interaction the electronic coupling strength between the excited adsorbate levels and the metal oxide conduction band. 

In the present study the surface chemistry of birnessite and of birnessite following the interaction with aqueous solutions of cobalt(II) and cobalt(III) amine complexes as a function of pH has been investigated using two surface sensitive spectroscopic techniques. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). The significant contribution that such an investigation can provide rests in the information obtained regarding the chemical nature of the neat metal oxide and of the metal oxide/metal ion adsorbate surfaces, within about the top 50 of the material surface. The chemical... 

Using resonant effects in core-level spectroscopic investigations of model chromophore adsorbates, such as bi-isonicotinic acid, on metal-oxide surfaces under UHV condition, even faster injection times have been tentatively proposed [85]. The injection time is observed to be comparable to the core-hole decay time of ca. 5 fs. It is also possible to resolve different injection times for different adsorbate electronic excited states with this technique. While the core-excitations themselves provide a perturbation to the system, and it cannot be ruled out that this influences the detailed interactions, the studies provide some of the first local molecular, state-specific injection time analysis with good temporal resolution in the low femtosecond regime. The results provide information about which factors determine the injection time on a molecular level. 

In this chapter, we have concentrated on MgO, one of the most studied and better understood oxide materials. We have shown that even on such a simple nontransition metal oxide about a dozen of different surface defect centers have been identified and described in the literature. Each of these centers has a somewhat different behavior toward adsorbed metal atoms. It becomes immediately clear that the precise assignment of the defect sites involved in the interaction, nucleation, and growth of the cluster is a formidable task. Nevertheless, thanks to the combined use of theory and experiment, the progress in this direction has been particularly significant and promising. For instance, a lot of evidence has been accumulated that points toward the role of the oxygen vacancies, the F centers. At the moment, these sites seem the most likely sites for nucleation and growth of small metal clusters. 

Oxide Supported Metallic Catalysts.- The local geometry about a metal atom provided by EXAFS may, in principle, provide a guide to the mean particle size, morphology, atomic distribution, cluster-support, and metal-adsorbate interactions. How much of this information is available in a particular case may also be a function of some of these same variables eg- particle size and structural order. But by a series of related experiments, the effects of sample history on catalyst structure may be identified. 

All mechanisms proposed in Scheme 7 start from the common hypotheses that the coordinatively unsaturated Cr(II) site initially adsorbs one, two, or three ethylene molecules via a coordinative d-7r bond (left column in Scheme 7). Supporting considerations about the possibility of coordinating up to three ethylene molecules come from Zecchina et al. [118], who recently showed that Cr(II) is able to adsorb and trimerize acetylene, giving benzene. Concerning the oxidation state of the active chromium sites, it is important to notice that, although the Cr(II) form of the catalyst can be considered as active , in all the proposed reactions the metal formally becomes Cr(IV) as it is converted into the active site. These hypotheses are supported by studies of the interaction of molecular transition metal complexes with ethylene [119,120]. Groppo et al. [66] have recently reported that the XANES feature at 5996 eV typical of Cr(II) species is progressively eroded upon in situ ethylene polymerization. 

Tunnelling electrons from a STM have also been used to excite photon emission from individual molecules, as has been demonstrated for Zn(II)-etioporphyrin I, adsorbed on an ultrathin alumina film (about 0.5 nm thick) grown on a NiAl(l 10) surface (Qiu et al, 2003). Such experiments have demonstrated the feasibility of fluorescence spectroscopy with submolecular precision, since hght emission is very sensitive to tip position inside the molecule. As mentioned before the oxide spacer serves to reduce the interaction between the molecule and the metal. The weakness of the molecule-substrate interaction is essential for the observation of STM-excited molecular fluorescence. 

In other studies Allara (27) used FTIR reflection to study the interaction of the oxide film of aluminum with acetic acid in which th aluminum acetate carbonyl stretch peak was found at 1590 cm- > in excellent agreement with the 1589 cm-1 peak determined by inelastic electron tunnelling spectroscopy (IETS), another modern technique for vibrational spectra at metal interfaces. The spectra of acetic acid adsorbed on copper oxide or indium,oxide were about the same. 

Adsorption methods may be used to provide information about the total surface area of a catalyst, the surface area of the phase carrying the active sites, or possibly even the type and number of active sites. The interaction between the adsorbate and the adsorbent may be chemical (chemisorption) or physical (phys-isorption) in nature and ideally should be a surface-specific interaction. It is necessary to be aware, however, that in some cases the interaction between the adsorbate and the adsorbent can lead to a chemical reaction in which more than just the surface layer of the adsorbent is involved. For example, when using oxidizing compounds as adsorbates (O2 or N2O) with metals such as copper or nickel or sulfides, subsurface oxidation may occur. 

---