Metal microstructured monolith

A comparison between ceramic foams and metallic microstructured monoliths of Fecralloy was performed for the OSR and CPO of propane under similar conditions of total catalyst amount, catalyst composition and modified catalyst residence time [40], A major difference in this investigation was, however, that uncoated foam was located before and after the catalytically coated foam to prevent gas-phase ignition. Irrespective of this difference, two main conclusions can be drawn first, the catalyst supported on the microchaimel structure did not deactivate like the foam catalyst under OSR conditions. This could be due to the fact that peak temperature... 

A microstructured monolith for autothermal reforming of isooctane was fabricated by Kolb et cd. from stainless steel metal foils, which were sealed to a monohthic stack of plates by laser welding [73]. A rhodium catalyst developed for this specific application was coated by a sol-gel technique onto the metal foils prior to the sealing procedure. The reactor carried a perforated plate in the inlet section to ensure flow equi-partition. At a weight hourly space velocity of 316 L (h gcat). S/C 3.3 and O/C 0.52 ratios, more than 99% conversion of the fuel was achieved. The temperature profile in the reactor was relatively flat. It decreased from 730 °C at the inlet section to 680 °C at the outlet. This was attributed to the higher wall thickness of the plate monolith compared with conventional metallic monolith technology. The reactor was later incorporated into a breadboard fuel processor (see Section 9.5). 

J. Wert, Microstructure of Friction Stir Weld Joints between an Aluminum-Base Metal Matrix Composite and a Monolithic Aluminum Alloy, Scr. Mater., Vol 49, 2003, p 607-612... 

Foams were proved to be highly suitable as catalytic carrier when low pressure drop is mandatory. In comparison to monoliths, they allow radial mixing of the fluid combined with enhanced heat transfer properties because of the solid continuous phase of the foam structure. Catalytic foams are successfully used for partial oxidation of hydrocarbons, catalytic combustion, and removal of soot from diesel engines [14]. The integration of foam catalysts in combination with microstructured devices was reported by Yu et al. [15]. The authors used metal foams as catalyst support for a microstructured methanol reformer and studied the influence of the foam material on the catalytic selectivity and activity. Moritz et al. [16] constructed a ceramic MSR with an inserted SiC-foam. The electric conductive material can be used as internal heating elements and allows a very rapid heating up to temperatures of 800-1000°C. In addition, heat conductivity of metal or SiC foams avoids axial and radial temperature profiles facilitating isothermal reactor operation. 

Find et al. [25] developed a nickel-based catalyst for methane steam reforming. As material for the microstructured plates, AluchromY steel, which is an FeCrAl alloy, was applied. This alloy forms a thin layer of alumina on its surface, which is less than 1 tm thick. This layer was used as an adhesion interface for the catalyst, a method which is also used in automotive exhaust systems based on metallic monoliths. Its formation was achieved by thermal treatment of microstructured plates for 4h at 1000 °C. The catalyst itself was based on a nickel spinel (NiAl204), which stabUizes the catalyst structure. The sol-gel technique was then used to coat the plates with the catalyst slurry. Good catalyst adhesion was proven by mechanical stress and thermal shock tests. Catalyst testing was performed in packed beds at a S/C ratio of 3 and reaction temperatures between 527 and 750 °C. The feed was composed of 12.5 vol.% methane and 37.5 vol.% steam balance argon. At a reaction temperature of 700°C and 32 h space velocity, conversion dose to the thermodynamic equilibrium could be achieved. During 96 h of operation the catalyst showed no detectable deactivation, which was not the case for a commercial nickel catalyst serving as a base for comparison. 

Catalyst cost may play a significant role in the overall fuel processor cost and could reach values as high as 38% [633]. In this situation, tailor-made catalyst formulations of enhanced activity are required along with meastues to increase the utilisation of the catalyst. This may be achieved by coating the catalyst into small channel systems of ceramic or metallic monoliths or into microstructured plate heat-exchangers, which improves the mass transfer, as described in Chapter 6. 

---