Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Membrane filtration microfiltration

Physical Techniques Physical techniques include ultraviolet radiation (UV), membrane filtration [microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF)j, and sand filtration. These techniques either modify the bacterium itself to hinder reproduction (UV) or remove bacteria via particle size filtration (MF, UF, and sand filtration). These techniques can be capital intensive and do little to address biofilm once formed. [Pg.209]

Membrane Filtration. Membrane filtration describes a number of weU-known processes including reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, microfiltration, and electro dialysis. The basic principle behind this technology is the use of a driving force (electricity or pressure) to filter... [Pg.162]

The individual membrane filtration processes are defined chiefly by pore size although there is some overlap. The smallest membrane pore size is used in reverse osmosis (0.0005—0.002 microns), followed by nanofiltration (0.001—0.01 microns), ultrafHtration (0.002—0.1 microns), and microfiltration (0.1—1.0 microns). Electro dialysis uses electric current to transport ionic species across a membrane. Micro- and ultrafHtration rely on pore size for material separation, reverse osmosis on pore size and diffusion, and electro dialysis on diffusion. Separation efficiency does not reach 100% for any of these membrane processes. For example, when used to desalinate—soften water for industrial processes, the concentrated salt stream (reject) from reverse osmosis can be 20% of the total flow. These concentrated, yet stiH dilute streams, may require additional treatment or special disposal methods. [Pg.163]

Polymer Membranes These are used in filtration applications for fine-particle separations such as microfiltration and ultrafiltration (clarification involving the removal of l- Im and smaller particles). The membranes are made from a variety of materials, the commonest being cellulose acetates and polyamides. Membrane filtration, discussed in Sec. 22, has been well covered by Porter (in Schweitzer, op. cit., sec. 2.1). [Pg.1707]

Process Description Microfiltration (MF) separates particles from true solutions, be they liquid or gas phase. Alone among the membrane processes, microfiltration may be accomplished without the use of a membrane. The usual materi s retained by a microfiltra-tion membrane range in size from several [Lm down to 0.2 [Lm. At the low end of this spectrum, very large soluble macromolecules are retained by a microfilter. Bacteria and other microorganisms are a particularly important class of particles retained by MF membranes. Among membrane processes, dead-end filtration is uniquely common to MF, but cross-flow configurations are often used. [Pg.2043]

Filtration Cross-flow filtration (microfiltration includes cross-flow filtration as one mode of operation in Membrane Separation Processes which appears earlier in this section) relies on the retention of particles by a membrane. The driving force for separation is pressure across a semipermeable membrane, while a tangential flow of the feed stream parallel to the membrane surface inhibits solids settling on and within the membrane matrix (Datar and Rosen, loc. cit.). [Pg.2058]

Intensive technologies are derived from the processes used for the treatment of potable water. Chemical methods include chlorination, peracetic acid, ozonation. Ultra-violet irradiation is becoming a popular photo-biochemical process. Membrane filtration processes, particularly the combination microfiltration/ultrafiltra-tion are rapidly developing (Fig. 3). Membrane bioreactors, a relatively new technology, look very promising as they combine the oxidation of the organic matter with microbial decontamination. Each intensive technique is used alone or in combination with another intensive technique or an extensive one. Extensive... [Pg.100]

Economics Micronltration may be the triumph of the Lilliputians nonetheless, there are a few large-industrial applications. Dextrose plants are very large, and as membrane filtration displaces the precoat filters now standard in the industry, very large membrane microfiltration equipment will be built. [Pg.57]

Recently, membrane filtration has become popular for treating industrial effluent. Membrane filtration includes microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF), and reverse... [Pg.329]

Microfiltration. Microfiltration is a pressure-driven membrane filtration process and has already been discussed in Chapter 8 for the separation of heterogeneous mixtures. Microfiltration retains particles down to a size of around 0.05 xm. Salts and large molecules pass through the membrane but particles of the size of bacteria and fat globules are rejected. A pressure difference of 0.5 to 4 bar is used across the membrane. Typical applications include ... [Pg.198]

Membrane filtration (reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, ultrafiltration, microfiltration)... [Pg.234]

Membrane absorbers are continuous chromatographic supports, which circumvent some of the above-mentioned problems of particulate stationary phases. They were originally derived from membrane (filtration) technology. The immobilization of interactive (ionic, hydrophobic, or biospecific) groups on the surface of microfiltration membranes was found to increase the selectivity of certain separation procedure. Ideally such activated membranes, or membrane adsorbers, allow the selective adsorption of certain substances and substance classes, which may subsequently be eluted by means of a stepwise change of the mobile phase (elution buffer). More complete information on the various types of modern membrane technology can be found in some recent reviews [e.g., 31-33]. [Pg.173]

Bubble Point Constancy. Although the exact relationship between the bubble point and the "pore size" of a microfiltration membrane is a matter of dispute (11, 12, 13, 14), nevertheless, it remains the quickest and most convenient means for demonstrating the continuing integrity of a membrane filtration system. It is consequently important that the bubble point be both reproducible (within a given range) and constant. It was, therefore, of considerable interest to discover that the bubble points of both conventional and poly(vinylidene fluoride) membranes increased with immersion time in deionized water whereas those of Tyrann-M/E and polyamide remained essentially constant (Figure 6). [Pg.209]

Reverse osmosis The use of pressure to force the solvent of a solution through a membrane, but not its solutes (compare with filtration, microfiltration, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration). [Pg.464]

Mass-transport limitations are common to all processes involving mass transfer at interfaces, and membranes are not an exception. This problem can be extremely important both for situations where the transport of solvent through the membrane is faster and preferential when compared with the transport of solute(s) - which happens with membrane filtration processes such as microfiltration and ultrafiltration - as well as with processes where the flux of solute(s) is preferential, as happens in organophilic pervaporation. In the first case, the concentration of solute builds up near the membrane interface, while in the second case a depletion of solute occurs. In both situations the performance of the system is affected negatively (1) solute accumulation leads, ultimately, to a loss of selectivity for solute rejection, promotes conditions for membrane fouling and local increase of osmotic pressure difference, which impacts on solvent flux (2) solute depletion at the membrane surface diminishes the driving force for solute transport, which impacts on solute flux and, ultimately, on the overall process selectivity towards the transport of that specific solute. [Pg.246]

Concentration of whev proteins. As mentioned earlier, microfiltration can be used to remove bacterias. In addition, they are capable of separating phospholipids, fats and casein fines of sweet whey or sour (acidified) whey. Ultrafiltration of whey has been well proven to provide an array of protein products of diverse compositions and properties. Inorganic membrane filtration can be used at different stages of the process to make whey protein concentrates (WPC) in powder form with a protein content reaching 50%. [Pg.193]

The impact of membrane filtration is not limited only to the quality of red wines. It is also ol rved with white wines. Given in Table 6.8. are the microfiltration results of a white and a red wine using 0.2 pun alumina membranes [Castelas and Serrano, 1989]. The TMP and crossflow velocity are 2 bars and 4.5 m/s, respectively. The changes on the wine quality are very obvious in almost every property. [Pg.207]

The most common sort of embodiment involving a liquid phase is the membrane separation of suspended solids from liquids, denoted variously by the terms filtration, microfiltration, and ultrafiltration, depending on the particle size, and which may include colloidal suspensions and emulsions. The solid particulates, for the most part, are deposited in the interstices or pores of a membrane barrier, and accordingly will require an intermittent backflushing operation. [Pg.671]

Recent research efforts brought about new and exciting developments in membrane technology, some with direct implications for the membrane filtration of beer. For example, Stopka et al. [21] reported flux enhancement in the microfiltration of a beer yeast suspension when using a ceramic membrane with a helically stamped surface. A relatively simple modification of the ceramic membrane surface resulted in modified hydrodynamic conditions and disturbance of the fouling layer. As compared with a regular, smooth ceramic membrane of the same nominal pore size, the stamped membrane leads to higher flux and lower power consumption per unit volume of permeate at the same velocity of the feed. [Pg.558]

Sedimentation and/or filtration (26,28) will be feasible for separating the insoluble chromium hydroxide precipitates (or chemical floes) from a wastewater. Other feasible solid-water separation processes for removing the insoluble chromium hydroxide include membrane filtration (such as ultrafiltration and microfiltration), continuous DAF, PC-SBR-sedimentation, PC-SBR-DAF. The following is a summary of the solid-water separation processes feasible for the combined application of chemical reduction and precipitation. [Pg.488]

Filtration membrane filtration is a common process that is widely used in many industries. The examples of membrane filtration include microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and the newly developed technology such as hydrophobic membrane. [Pg.530]


See other pages where Membrane filtration microfiltration is mentioned: [Pg.410]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.2844]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.573]    [Pg.810]    [Pg.998]    [Pg.4041]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.501 , Pg.504 ]




SEARCH



Filtration microfiltration

Membrane filtration

Membrane filtration microfiltration membranes

Membrane microfiltration

Microfiltration

© 2024 chempedia.info