Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Membrane diffusion process

Selective membrane diffusion processes also offer a promising approach to separating hot gases and these are discussed below in Section 2.6. [Pg.44]

In these investigations it had already been found that in the final state a coacer-vate wets the walls of the enclosing membrane and thus a parietal coacervate is produced which surrounds a central cavity filled with equilibrium liquid. Because of the comparatively large thickness of the celloidin membranes (diffusion processes slow), it lasts a considerable time before this final state is reached. [Pg.467]

Carrier-facilitated membrane extraction and transport therefore can be viewed as a combination of solvent extraction and membrane diffusion processes and the extent to which each process contributes to the overall process is an area of particular importance to PIM technology. Figure 10.2 illustrates the principles of carrier-facilitated membrane separation of a cation (M ). In this example the stripping reagent (X+) is in sufficiently high concentration to allow the target cation to be transported quantitatively from the source to the receiving solution. [Pg.240]

The individual membrane filtration processes are defined chiefly by pore size although there is some overlap. The smallest membrane pore size is used in reverse osmosis (0.0005—0.002 microns), followed by nanofiltration (0.001—0.01 microns), ultrafHtration (0.002—0.1 microns), and microfiltration (0.1—1.0 microns). Electro dialysis uses electric current to transport ionic species across a membrane. Micro- and ultrafHtration rely on pore size for material separation, reverse osmosis on pore size and diffusion, and electro dialysis on diffusion. Separation efficiency does not reach 100% for any of these membrane processes. For example, when used to desalinate—soften water for industrial processes, the concentrated salt stream (reject) from reverse osmosis can be 20% of the total flow. These concentrated, yet stiH dilute streams, may require additional treatment or special disposal methods. [Pg.163]

Cross-flow-elec trofiltratiou (CF-EF) is the multifunctional separation process which combines the electrophoretic migration present in elec trofiltration with the particle diffusion and radial-migration forces present in cross-flow filtration (CFF) (microfiltration includes cross-flow filtration as one mode of operation in Membrane Separation Processes which appears later in this section) in order to reduce further the formation of filter cake. Cross-flow-electrofiltratiou can even eliminate the formation of filter cake entirely. This process should find application in the filtration of suspensions when there are charged particles as well as a relatively low conduc tivity in the continuous phase. Low conductivity in the continuous phase is necessary in order to minimize the amount of elec trical power necessaiy to sustain the elec tric field. Low-ionic-strength aqueous media and nonaqueous suspending media fulfill this requirement. [Pg.2008]

From a thermodynamic and kinetic perspective, there are only three types of membrane transport processes passive diffusion, faeilitated diffusion, and active transport. To be thoroughly appreciated, membrane transport phenomena must be considered in terms of thermodynamics. Some of the important kinetic considerations also will be discussed. [Pg.297]

The explicit mathematical treatment for such stationary-state situations at certain ion-selective membranes was performed by Iljuschenko and Mirkin 106). As the publication is in Russian and in a not widely distributed journal, their work will be cited in the appendix. The authors obtain an equation (s. (34) on page 28) similar to the one developed by Eisenman et al. 6) for glass membranes using the three-segment potential approach. However, the mobilities used in the stationary-state treatment are those which describe the ion migration in an electric field through a diffusion layer at the phase boundary. A diffusion process through the entire membrane with constant ion mobilities does not have to be assumed. The non-Nernstian behavior of extremely thin layers (i.e., ISFET) can therefore also be described, as well as the role of an electron transfer at solid-state membranes. [Pg.236]

In order to design a zeoHte membrane-based process a good model description of the multicomponent mass transport properties is required. Moreover, this will reduce the amount of practical work required in the development of zeolite membranes and MRs. Concerning intracrystaUine mass transport, a decent continuum approach is available within a Maxwell-Stefan framework for mass transport [98-100]. The well-defined geometry of zeoHtes, however, gives rise to microscopic effects, like specific adsorption sites and nonisotropic diffusion, which become manifested at the macroscale. It remains challenging to incorporate these microscopic effects into a generalized model and to obtain an accurate multicomponent prediction of a real membrane. [Pg.231]

As described earlier, the inside-outside asymmetry of membrane proteins is stable, and mobifity of proteins across (rather than in) the membrane is rare therefore, transverse mobility of specific carrier proteins is not likely to account for facilitated diffusion processes except in a few unusual cases. [Pg.427]

Process Description Pervaporation is a separation process in which a liquid mixture contacts a nonporous permselective membrane. One component is transported through the membrane preferentially. It evaporates on the downstream side of the membrane leaving as a vapor. The name is a contraction of permeation and evaporation. Permeation is induced by lowering partial pressure of the permeating component, usually by vacuum or occasionally with a sweep gas. The permeate is then condensed or recovered. Thus, three steps are necessary Sorption of the permeating components into the membrane, diffusive transport across the nonporous membrane, then desorption into the permeate space, with a heat effect. Pervaporation membranes are chosen for high selectivity, and the permeate is often highly purified. [Pg.63]

Diffusion-mediated release of root exudates is likely to be affected by root zone temperature due to temperature-dependent changes in the speed of diffusion processes and modifications of membrane permeability (259,260). This might explain the stimulation of root exudation in tomato and clover at high temperatures, reported by Rovira (261), and also the increase in exudation of. sugars and amino acids in maize, cucumber, and strawberry exposed to low-temperature treatments (5-10°C), which was mainly attributed to a disturbance in membrane permeability (259,262). A decrease of exudation rates at low temperatures may be predicted for exudation processes that depend on metabolic energy. This assumption is supported by the continuous decrease of phytosiderophore release in Fe-deficient barley by decreasing the temperature from 30 to 5°C (67). [Pg.74]

Studies of the effect of permeant s size on the translational diffusion in membranes suggest that a free-volume model is appropriate for the description of diffusion processes in the bilayers [93]. The dynamic motion of the chains of the membrane lipids and proteins may result in the formation of transient pockets of free volume or cavities into which a permeant molecule can enter. Diffusion occurs when a permeant jumps from a donor to an acceptor cavity. Results from recent molecular dynamics simulations suggest that the free volume transport mechanism is more likely to be operative in the core of the bilayer [84]. In the more ordered region of the bilayer, a kink shift diffusion mechanism is more likely to occur [84,94]. Kinks may be pictured as dynamic structural defects representing small, mobile free volumes in the hydrocarbon phase of the membrane, i.e., conformational kink g tg ) isomers of the hydrocarbon chains resulting from thermal motion [52] (Fig. 8). Small molecules can enter the small free volumes of the kinks and migrate across the membrane together with the kinks. [Pg.817]

Leakage through a synthetic liner is controlled by Fick s first law, which applies to the process of liquid diffusion through the liner membrane. The diffusion process is similar to flow governed by Darcy s law except that it is driven by concentration gradients and not by hydraulic head. Diffusion rates in membranes are very low in comparison with hydraulic flow rates even in clays. In synthetic liners, therefore, the factor that most influences liner performance is penetrations. Synthetic liners may have imperfect seams or pinholes, which can greatly increase the amount of leachate that leaks out of the landfill. [Pg.1118]

Two distinguishing features of gastrointestinal active and facilitated transport processes are that they are capacity-limited and inhibitable. Passive transcellular solute flux is proportional to mucosal solute concentration (C), where the proportionality constant is the ratio of the product of membrane diffusion coefficient (Dm) and distribution coefficient (Kd) to the length of the transcellular pathway (Lm). [Pg.184]

Facilitated Diffusion. Temporary combination of the chemical with some form of carrier occurs in the gut wall, facilitating the transfer of the toxicant across the membranes. This process is also dependent on the concentration gradient across the membrane, and there is no energy utilization in making the translocation. In some intoxications, the carrier may become saturated, making this the rate-limiting step in the absorption process. [Pg.456]

Substrate transport through the film may be formally assimilated to membrane diffusion with a diffusion coefficient defined as12 Ds = Dch( 1 — 9)/pjort. In this equation, the effect of film structure on the transport process in taken into account in two ways. The factor 1—0 stands for the fact that in a plane parallel to the electrode surface and to the coating-solution interface, a fraction 9 of the surface area in made unavailable for linear diffusion (diffusion coefficient Dcj,) by the presence of the film. The tortuosity factor,, defined as the ratio between the average length of the channel and the film thickness, accounts for the fact that the substrate... [Pg.283]


See other pages where Membrane diffusion process is mentioned: [Pg.153]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.2031]    [Pg.2053]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.728]    [Pg.732]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.465]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3769 ]




SEARCH



Diffusion process

Membrane diffusivity

Membrane process

Membrane processing

Membranes diffusion

© 2024 chempedia.info