Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Martensite state

The formation of a heavily twinned material on cooling can be reversed by an increase in temperature, which causes the material to transform to the untwinned pre-martensite state. The transformation starts at a temperature, usually called As, the austenite start temperature, and is complete at a temperature Af, the austenite finish temperature (Figure 8.16). (These terms are related to the fact that the best-known martensitic transformation is that of austenite to martensite, in steels.) For the alloy NiTi, As is 71 °C, and Af is 77 °C. It is seen that Ms and Mf differ from As and Af. This is a hysteresis phenomenon, commonly found in solid-state transformations. [Pg.239]

Shape memory alloys work by viitue of their intrinsic switching between two crystalline states, i.e., martensite and austenite (Sherby et al., 2008). At lower temperatures, these alloys adopt the martensite state, which is relatively soft, plastic, and quite easy to shape at a certain higher temperature, they transform into the austenite state, which is a much harder material and not so easy to deform. Figure 1.1 illustrates the principles of shape memory effect in metal alloys. [Pg.3]

The properties of the shape memory alloy vary with its temperature. Above the transition temperature, the alloys crystallic structure takes on the austenitic state. Its structure is symmetric and the alloy shows a high elastic modulus. The martensitic crystalline structure will be more stable for thermodynamical reasons if the materials temperature drops below the transformation temperature. Martensite can evolve from austenitic crystals in various crystallographic directions and will form a twinned structure. Boundaries of twinned martensite can easily be moved for that reason SM elements can be deformed with quite low forces in the martensitic state. [Pg.146]

Microstmcture and Grain Size. The carbon steels having relatively low hardenabihty do not contaia martensite or bainite ia the cast, roUed, or forged state. The constituents of the hypoeutectoid steels are therefore ferrite and peariite, and of the hypereutectoid steels, cementite and peariite. [Pg.394]

Many metals and metallic alloys show martensitic transformations at temperatures below the melting point. Martensitic transformations are structural phase changes of first order which belong to the broader class of diffusion js solid-state phase transformations. These are structural transformations of the crystal lattice, which do not involve long-range atomic movements. A recent review of the properties and the classification of diffusionless transformations has been given by Delayed... [Pg.95]

Martensitic phase transformations are discussed for the last hundred years without loss of actuality. A concise definition of these structural phase transformations has been given by G.B. Olson stating that martensite is a diffusionless, lattice distortive, shear dominant transformation by nucleation and growth . In this work we present ab initio zero temperature calculations for two model systems, FeaNi and CuZn close in concentration to the martensitic region. Iron-nickel is a typical representative of the ferrous alloys with fee bet transition whereas the copper-zink alloy undergoes a transformation from the open to close packed structure. ... [Pg.213]

M. Liu, T.R. Finlayson, and T.F. Smith, Thermal expansion of martensitic In-Tl stress-induced micro structure and premartensite state, Phys. Rev. B 48 3009 (1993). [Pg.338]

D.J. Gunton and G.A. Saunders, The Elastic Behaviour of In-Tl alloys in the vicinity of the martensitic transition, Solid State Commun. 14 865 (1974). [Pg.338]

Austenitic steels of the 304S15 type are normally heat treated at 1 050°C and cooled at a fairly rapid rate to remove the effects of cold or hot working, and in this state much of the carbon is in supersaturated solid solution. Reheating to temperatures below the solution treatment temperature leads to the formation of chromium-rich MjjCj precipitates predominantly at the grain boundaries with the production of chromium gradients and reduced corrosion resistance as is the case with the martensitic steels. Any attack is... [Pg.539]

The austenitic grades, used mainly in the solution treated (softened) state, have low strength at ambient temperature but maintain strength at elevated temperatures much better than the martensitics and the ferritics. As can be seen from Figs 7.23 to 7.25, creep and rupture. strengths are far superior... [Pg.1019]

Because of the inherently non-equilibrium nature of the production route, the first question which needed to be answered was whether the phases present in the alloy were in fact stable, so that equilibrium calculations could actually be used to design these alloys. To this end CALPHAD calculations were combined with a detailed experimental characterisation of a Fe7oCrigMo2B o alloy (Kim et al. 1990, Pan 1992). The TEM and XRD results confirmed earlier work (Xu et al. 1985) which stated that an orthorhombic boride M2B was present and its composition was Cr-rich. However, they also showed that a proportion of the borides ( 10%) were Mo-rich and that the Fe-based matrix was martensitic. The latter result was particularly surprising because of the high level (20at%) of a-ferrite stabilisers Cr and Mo. Furthermore, initial analysis of difiiaction patterns from the TEM work indicated that the shuctuie of the Mo-rich boride was a tetragonal type whose structure had not been reported in previous literature (Kim and Cantor 1988). [Pg.391]

Figure 3.6 Shape-memory alloys transform from (a) a partially ordered, high-temperature austenitic phase to (b) a mixed austenite-martensite low-temperature state to (c) an ordered mixed-phase state under deformation. Figure 3.6 Shape-memory alloys transform from (a) a partially ordered, high-temperature austenitic phase to (b) a mixed austenite-martensite low-temperature state to (c) an ordered mixed-phase state under deformation.
Let us regard a binary A-B system that has been quenched sufficiently fast from the / -phase field into the two phase region (a + / ) (see, for example, Fig. 6-2). If the cooling did not change the state of order by activated atomic jumps, the crystal is now supersaturated with respect to component B. When further diffusional jumping is frozen, some crystals then undergo a diffusionless first-order phase transition, / ->/ , into a different crystal structure. This is called a martensitic transformation and the product of the transformation is martensite. [Pg.296]

Such transformations have been extensively studied in quenched steels, but they can also be found in nonferrous alloys, ceramics, minerals, and polymers. They have been studied mainly for technical reasons, since the transformed material often has useful mechanical properties (hard, stiff, high damping (internal friction), shape memory). Martensitic transformations can occur at rather low temperature ( 100 K) where diffusional jumps of atoms are definitely frozen, but also at much higher temperature. Since they occur without transport of matter, they are not of central interest to solid state kinetics. However, in view of the crystallographic as well as the elastic and even plastic implications, diffusionless transformations may inform us about the principles involved in the structural part of heterogeneous solid state reactions, and for this reason we will discuss them. [Pg.296]

We have mentioned above the tendency of atoms to preserve their coordination in solid state processes. This suggests that the diffusionless transformation tries to preserve close-packed planes and close-packed directions in both the parent and the martensite structure. For the example of the Bain-transformation this then means that 111) -> 011). (J = martensite) and <111> -. Obviously, the main question in this context is how to conduct the transformation (= advancement of the p/P boundary) and ensure that on a macroscopic scale the growth (habit) plane is undistorted (invariant). In addition, once nucleation has occurred, the observed high transformation velocity (nearly sound velocity) has to be explained. Isothermal martensitic transformations may well need a long time before significant volume fractions of P are transformed into / . This does not contradict the high interface velocity, but merely stresses the sluggish nucleation kinetics. The interface velocity is essentially temperature-independent since no thermal activation is necessary. [Pg.297]


See other pages where Martensite state is mentioned: [Pg.461]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.1198]    [Pg.1202]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.298]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 , Pg.4 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 , Pg.4 ]




SEARCH



Martensitic

© 2024 chempedia.info