Markov analysis

Markov Analyses (MA) Similar to the DD and FTA, but additionally calculates the probability of the system being in various states as a function of time. Here airworthiness is not a simple mathematical calculation, but depends on relative states of part of the system. However, MA has limitations that an FTA does not (e.g. it is difficult to model large complex systems and visualise fault paths in an M A model). For more information, see Appendix F in SAE ARP4761 (App E) and Chfton (2005, Chl8). 

Identification of sub-systems associated with hazards The evacuation requirements are focussed on departure sub-systems are per the above DD, FTA and Markov analyses. Arrival systems would be shut down... 

Markov analysis (Sec. 2.5.4) Evaluation of components systems, or functions Quantitative, time-dependent modeling process complc.s. success oriented has pcicniial for modeling complete nuclear plant... 

This is a kind of "differential adsorption isotherm", relaying how strongly the counterion charge increases with the surface charge. Figures 3.45 and 3.46 are illustrations of a Esin-Markov analysis for Agl in KNOg. For this system it was Eilso found that p Increases from Li to Cs this is a typical specific effect, caused by the increased non-electric adsorption in this direction. At the same time, the cj°(pAg) curves for different salt concentrations are wider apart for CsNOg than... 

The modelling approach indicated may now be used recursively to solve the entire system where a, is the transition rate between (j)] and (j>k. By Markov analysis we can also obtain Pj(f) and Pj which are the system state probabUities and the steady sate probabdities respectively. 

The second recommended modelling technique uses Maikov analysis with a reduced number of system states in order to deal with the state space explosion that can, in some cases, cause problems when using Markov analysis. The reduced model contains a full-up system state, where no faults are present, a LOTC state, where the system is failed and a number of dispatchable single fault states. Each of these single fault states has a failure transition leading to it from the... 

The focus is given to the following three methods, the )3-factor model, the PDS method, and Markov analysis. The need for Markov analysis becomes evident when working with SIS of a more complex nature, for instance non-identical components. This method is, when using a computer, not overly complex and it is possible to model virtually every possible architecture a SIS may have. 

The article at hand, which is an extract of a Master s thesis by Lilleheier (2008) treats one specific SIS with respect to CCF-modelling. Three CCF models, the /S-factor model, the PDS method and Markov analysis are presented in 3. These methods are introduced shortly, before being applied to the current example in Section 4. 

Since components 3 and 4 are identical, the notation used to describe these is X = 3.4 10 . Ai = 1 is assumed to be small enough so that the probability of more than one error in the same 1 hour interval may be neglected. In practice, the transformation is done by multiplying At by every term in T. When Ai = 1, no changes are actually made to the matrix T, but the values are now probabihties and not rates. We have moved from continuous time Markov analysis to discrete time Markov analysis. 

The largest value for the PFD was obtained when using Markov analysis. We notice that for this method, we are not able to distinguish between independent and dependent failures. This follows as a natural consequence of the Markov assumption which states The probability of the system being in state i + 1 is only dependent ofstate i and independent ofstate i—, see Ross (99). 

There is one simplification which was made for all methods except when using Markov analysis and this proves to be of some consequence. The simplification in question is that both the 8-factor model and the PDS method apply the geometric mean and thus use one estimated failure rate instead of the actual ones. For the current example this simplification proves to be dire, since the system fails if components 3 and 4 in Figure 3 fail. These two components have failure rates equaling 3.4 10 and not 1.04 10 as estimated for the other two methods. 

The Markov analysis does in this case present a model closest resembles the real system. As a consequence, the estimate provided by Markov analysis is considered to be the most reliable. 

For non-identical failure rates, as used in the present paper, it is important to proceed with care, especially when the difference is large. In such cases Markov analysis is valuable and preferable compared to the /S-factor model and the PDS method. 

Since only the two components with high failure rate in the given system needed to fail for the system to fail, the strategy of taking the geometric mean of all components result in a too low PFD. Markov analysis is thus better at accoimting for the diversity of such systems. 

Markov analysis is a statistical technique used in forecasting the future behavior of a variable or system that have Markov property. Having the Markov property means that, given the present state, future states are independent of the past states. Exponential probability distribution is an important condition for application of Markov analysis. In our case it is fulfilled only for failure rate and not for repair rate and detection rate. Nevertheless X << /i and X << S therefore we can neglect the condition mentioned above. 

A fault propagation method used to analyze failure rate or probability for safety instrumented functions. A diagram is constructed to represent the system under consideration including the logical relationships between its components. In Markov analysis there are a group of circles, each of which represents a system state. The different states are connected with transitions, which are shown as arrows and indicate paths to move from one state to another. The transitions are quantified using either failure rates when the transition is from an acceptable state to a failed state or... 

Using the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation (1) for Markov analysis, it is possible to analyse this model in order to determine the probabilities, P(t), of each failure mode. 

Markov Analysis (Figure 3) depicts input/output transitions leading to system failure ... 

The Markov Analysis shows the various states and transitions between them. In particular, the significance of unrevealed failures in backup systems is brought to the fore. The various cut sets are ... 

Literature on the many techniques for making risk assessments is abundant. For example, in ANSI/ASSE Z690.3. Risk Assessment Techniques—reviews are included of 31 techniques. Examples are such as Primary Hazard Analysis, Fault Tree Analysis, Hazard and Operably Studies, Bow Tie Analysis, Markov Analysis, and Bayesian Statistics. Uncomplicated systems that could be introduced to supervisors and front-line employees are not as prevalent. Such a system is contained in an extension of the previously cited European Community bulletin. It follows. 

Dynamic FTA is used more commonly in computer systems fault analysis and involves employing Markov analysis to generate the tree. Dynamic fault trees are also frequently used to model fault-tolerant systems. The challenge is that the size of the tree grows very quickly and can be very cumbersome to manipulate. 

In the Monte Carlo procedure the polymer chain growth was simulated, assuming the conditional probabilities of the three ways of monomer ring opening calculated from Markov analysis. 

Rouvroye, 2001) Rouvroye J. L. (2001) Enhanced Markov Analysis as a method to assess safety in the process industry (PhD), Technishe Universiteit Eindhoven, ISBN 90-386-2772-6. 

Markov analysis is a technique which can be used when the assumption that the future state of a system depends only upon its present state holds (lEC/ ISO 31010, 2009). Markov analysis assesses the rehabiUty of a given system (Muthu and Petrou, 2007) by analyzing the transition probabiUties, i.e. knowing the state the system is currently in, by the... 

Markov analysis is a specific software-supported method. For many fields in urban security we deem it unlikely that the Markov property holds, i.e. that future events only depend on the present situation and are not influenced by past events. 

ISA Standard, Safety Instrumented Functions (SIF)— Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Evaluation Techniques Part 4 Determining the SIL of a SIF via Markov Analysis, TR84.00.02-2002, Part 4, 2002. ISA-The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society. Research Triangle Park, NC. 

---