Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Many-body theories calculations

It is important to realize that each of the electronic-structure methods discussed above displays certain shortcomings in reproducing the correct band structure of the host crystal and consequently the positions of defect levels. Hartree-Fock methods severely overestimate the semiconductor band gap, sometimes by several electron volts (Estreicher, 1988). In semi-empirical methods, the situation is usually even worse, and the band structure may not be reliably represented (Deak and Snyder, 1987 Besson et al., 1988). Density-functional theory, on the other hand, provides a quite accurate description of the band structure, except for an underestimation of the band gap (by up to 50%). Indeed, density-functional theory predicts conduction bands and hence conduction-band-derived energy levels to be too low. This problem has been studied in great detail, and its origins are well understood (see, e.g., Hybertsen and Louie, 1986). To solve it, however, requires techniques of many-body theory and carrying out a quasi-particle calculation. Such calculational schemes are presently prohibitively complex and too computationally demanding to apply to defect calculations. [Pg.609]

These values of A and U have been obtained by using the Argonne v i two-body force [20] both in the BHF and in the variational many-body theories. However, the required repulsive component ( U) is much weaker in the BHF approach, consistent with the observation that in the variational calculations usually heavier nuclei as well as nuclear matter are underbound. Indeed, less repulsive TBF became available recently [21] in order to address this problem. [Pg.118]

The numerical determination of E grr by the use of many-body theory is a formidable task, and estimates of it based on E j and E p serve as important benchmarks for the development of methods for calculating electron correlation effects. The purpose of this work is to obtain improved estimates of Epp by combining the leading-order relativistic and many-body effects which have been omitted in Eq. (1) with experimentally determined values of the total electronic energy, and precise values of Epjp. We then obtain empirical estimates of E grr for the diatomic species N2, CO, BF, and NO using Epip and E p and the definition of E g in Eq. (1). [Pg.128]

For systems containing light elements, however, Eq. (2) currently offers the most accurate method for calculating of Ep from first principles and for the estimation of E g,.,. for the calibration of non-relativistic many-body theory. For diatomic molecules high precision accurate numerical methods are available for the calculation of Epp, and, furthermore, Egg,., is about an order of magnitude larger than Ep for light elements. [Pg.130]

Moreover, for atoms with open shells, the difficulties in calculating the angular parts of the PT expansion grow very rapidly with the increase in the order of expansion terms. Even the methods of their calculations are not developed sufficiently, unlike the usual mathematical apparatus of the theory of atomic spectra. Therefore, in order to successfully apply the PT to complex atoms, further development of the many-body theory... [Pg.17]

To account for the interchannel coupling, or, which is the same, electron correlation in calculations of photoionization parameters, various many-body theories exist. In this paper, following Refs. [20,29,30,33], the focus is on results obtained in the framework of both the nonrelativistic random phase approximation with exchange (RPAE) [55] and its relativistic analogy the relativistic random phase approximation (RRPA) [56]. RPAE makes use of a nonrelativistic HF approximation as the zero-order approximation. RRPA is based upon the relativistic Dirac HF approximation as the zero-order basis, so that relativistic effects are included not as perturbations but explicitly. Both RPAE and RRPA implicitly sum up certain electron-electron perturbations, including the interelectron interaction between electrons from... [Pg.23]

A typical feature of the perturbation expansion (52) is that the correlation energy is expressed by way of an infinite series. It is understandable that for actual calculations the expansion (52) must be truncated. It is one of the outstanding advantages of the many-body theory that it allows one to sum certain types of diagram contributions... [Pg.118]

Accurate calculations of relativistic effects in atoms have been done using many-body theory which includes electron-electron correlations. We used a correlation-... [Pg.567]

Following the advances of the many-body theory started in physics in fifties and sixties of the twentieth century [1-8], many researchers in theoretical chemistry employed the ideas developed in physics and extended them to systems with a finite number of electrons [9-21]. Different software packages were developed soon [22] and applied to calculations of ionization potentials and electron affinities of various chemical systems [23-29]. The calculations appeared to be efficient, and the results were amazingly accurate. [Pg.263]

This article is divided into seven parts. The many-body perturbation theory is discussed in the next section. The algebraic approximation is discussed in some detail in section 3 since this approximation is fundamental to most molecular applications. In the fourth section, the truncation of the many-body perturbation series is discussed, and, since other approaches to the many-electron correlation problem may be regarded as different ways of truncating the many-body perturbation expansion, we briefly discuss the relation to other approaches. Computational aspects of many-body perturbative calculations are considered in section 5. In section 6, some typical applications to molecules are given. In the final section, some other aspects of the many-body perturbation theory of molecules are briefly discussed and possible directions for future investigations are outlined. [Pg.4]

The calculation describes the differential cross sections and 2 P electron impact coherence parameters quite well. For the 2 P differential cross section it is contrasted with a variant of the distorted-wave Born approximation, first-order many-body theory, where the distorted waves are both calculated in the initial-state Hartree—Fock potential. [Pg.231]

Many-body theory starts out from the principle that all wavefunctions (for both ground and excited states) should be calculated in the same atomic field, i.e. from the same Hamiltonian. The perturbative expansion then allows the higher-order corrections to be calculated systematically. It can then be shown [250] that in the pure RPAE, the dipole length and dipole velocity forms of the cross section are precisely equal, by construction. For this reason, the pure RPAE is often referred to as exact, which means simply that it satisfies equation (5.31) exactly, and not that one should necessarily expect it to agree exactly with experiment. [Pg.183]


See other pages where Many-body theories calculations is mentioned: [Pg.343]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.857]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.155]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.116 ]




SEARCH



Many calculation

Many theory

Many-body

Many-body perturbation theory calculations

Many-body theories

Theory calculation

© 2024 chempedia.info