Liquid chromatography cleanup

Following initial sample extraction, the primary extract must frequently be subjected to some kind of further cleanup including liquid-liquid partitioning, diphasic dialysis, solid-phase extraction, matrix solid-phase dispersion, immunoaffinity chromatography cleanup, liquid chromatography cleanup, or online trace enrichment. In some instances, some of these procedures are used in combination in order to attain higher purification levels. 

Liquid chromatography cleanup on a LiChrosorb Diol column has been further proposed for the offline purification of chloramphenicol residues from bovine muscle and eggs (32). An online approach based on reversed-phase principles has also been described for isolation of chloramphenicol residues from swine kidney by an automated column switching system (63). Use of a protein exclusion column (Hisep) has been also suggested in an online trace-enrichment method for the determination of chloramphenicol in animal tissues (52). By employing a column-switching system, all chloramphenicol that eluted from the protein exclusion column was trapped at the entry of a 5 m Supelcosil LC-18 preconcentration column, to be subsequently back-flashed into the analytical column. 

Following the primary sample extraction, the crude extract can be further subjected to various types of cleanup procedures including conventional liquid-liquid partitioning, solid-phase extraction, and liquid chromatography cleanup. In some instances, more than one of these cleanup procedures may be used in combination to obtain highly purified extracts. 

Liquid chromatography cleanup has been further described for purification of lincomycin residues from milk and tissue extracts (146). This procedure involves loading the sample extract onto a reversed-phase column (Supelcosil LC-... 

J. V. Posluszny and R. Weinherger, Detemiination of drug substances in biological fluids by diiect injection multidimensional liquid chromatography with a micellar cleanup and reversed-phase clnomatography , Chem. 60 1953-1958(1988). 

A UV spectrum with a pronounced absorption above 210 nm allows UV detection after liquid chromatography (LC), but an absorption maximum in the range of visible light may also decompose during cleanup procedures and require the elimination of light when handling extracts. 

A further extension of the DFG S19 method was achieved when polar analytes and those unsuitable for GC were determined by LC/MS or more preferably by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Triple-quadrupole MS/MS and ion trap MS" have become more affordable and acceptable in the recent past. These techniques provide multiple analyte methods by employing modes such as time segments, scan events or multiple injections. By improving the selectivity and sensitivity of detection after HPLC separation, the DFG S19 extraction and cleanup scheme can be applied to polar or high molecular weight analytes, and cleanup steps such as Si02 fractionation or even GPC become unnecessary. 

The enforcement methods provided by the applicants give basic information about appropriate cleanup steps and specific determination procedures. Typically, direct use of this developmental work occurred when a GC multi-residue method was found appropriate. Owing to the recent developments in the field of MS/MS with atmospheric pressure ionization, an alternative approach for those compounds that can be analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC) will soon be possible. It is important that some fundamental considerations for such method(s) should be agreed at the outset. Considerations include the most suitable extraction solvents and cleanup steps and some standard HPLC conditions. 

MAE in conjunction with high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS) shortened the cleanup procedure and provided satisfactory recoveries (97-102%) for the parent imazethapyr and its two metabolites (hydroxy and glucose conjugate metabolites). 

For method tryout, run a control sample and two fortifications from each site. One fortification should be done at the LOQ and the other at the highest expected residue level, perhaps 1000 x LOQ. If the recoveries are within the acceptable range of 70-120% and there are no interferences, proceed with the method validation. If interferences are present which prevent quantitation of the analyte, try additional cleanup steps with SPE or use a more selective detection method such as liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). 

Residue analytical methods for neonicotinoids in crops, soil and water samples have been developed. The basic principle of these methods consists of the following steps extraction of the crop and/or soil samples with acetone or the other organic solvent, cleanup by liquid-liquid partition or column chromatography, and quantitative analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC/UV). Simple column cleanup procedures are used to improve the accuracy and sensitivity of these methods. 

Crop material is homogenized with acetonitrile-water (9 1, v/v). The crop extract is centrifuged and an aliquot is rotary evaporated to a small volume. The sample is subjected to a Cig solid-phase extraction (SPE) cleanup procedure. The concentrated eluate is subjected to liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) analysis. 

---