Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Linear relaxation function

For the special case of linear relaxation functions f. or when the integrand in Eq. (3) is invariant on the wavefront, we have the simplified Equation for the time relaxation of the propagating disturbance ... [Pg.281]

These two mathematical Equations (4.59) and (4.60) illustrate an important feature about linear viscoelastic measurements, i.e. the central role played by the relaxation function and the compliance. These terms can be used to describe the response of a material to any deformation history. If these can be modelled in terms of the chemistry of the system the complete linear rheological response of our material can be obtained. [Pg.121]

This is an extended exponential. It operates within the remit of linear viscoelastic theory. So for example for a simple exponential we can show that the integral under the relaxation function gives the low shear viscosity ... [Pg.142]

The data has been superimposed by dividing the relaxation function G(t) by G(t = 0), the limiting short time value, and the time has been divided by the characteristic relaxation time Tr. The first feature to notice is that the stress relaxation function overshoots and shows a peak. This is an example of non-linear behaviour. It is related to both the material and the instrumental response (Section 4.5.1). The general shape of the curves (excluding the stress overshoot) can be described using two approaches. [Pg.173]

The function fj(y) represents the non-linear strain dependence of the deformed tube. The non-linear stress relaxation function in the reptation zone is thus... [Pg.268]

Rubinstein has constructed on a reptation-fluctuation approach a detailed self-consistent theory of constraint release, allowing each loss of entanglement in one chain to permit a random jump in the tube of another [37]. When this is done the form of predicted relaxation functions are in good accord with experiments. However, in monodisperse linear melts it appears that the fluctuation contribution is more important than constraint release. [Pg.224]

Equation (15.23) displays the feature of locality that the blending functions should possess in order to be computationally advantageous that is, during the process of matrix inversion, one wishes the calculation to proceed quickly. As mentioned earlier, the use of linear approximation functions results in at most five terms on the left side of the equation analogous to (15.23), yielding a much crader approximation, but one more easily calculated. The current choice of Bezier functions, on the other hand, is rapidly convergent for methods such as relaxation, possesses excellent continuity properties (the solution is guaranteed to look and behave reasonably), and does not require substantial computation. [Pg.267]

The response of simple fluids to certain classes of deformation history can be analyzed. That is, a limited number of material functions can be identified which contain all the information necessary to describe the behavior of a substance in any member of that class of deformations. Examples are the viscometric or steady shear flows which require, at most, three independent functions of the shear rate (79), and linear viscoelastic behavior (80,81) which requires only a single function, in this case a relaxation function. The functions themselves must be determined experimentally for each substance. [Pg.20]

Fig. 6. Reduced relaxation modulus for the Cubic array as a function of molecular weight Broken line indicates characteristic slope of the linear relaxation modulus... Fig. 6. Reduced relaxation modulus for the Cubic array as a function of molecular weight Broken line indicates characteristic slope of the linear relaxation modulus...
Fig. 7. Composite relaxation function for PMMA at 115 °C. The data is nearly linear over this range and has neither reached a value near the intercept at short times nor near the baseline at long times... Fig. 7. Composite relaxation function for PMMA at 115 °C. The data is nearly linear over this range and has neither reached a value near the intercept at short times nor near the baseline at long times...
Since scope economies are especially hard to quantify, a separate class of optimization models solely dealing with plant loading decisions can be found. For example, Mazzola and Schantz (1997) propose a non-linear mixed integer program that combines a fixed cost charge for each plant-product allocation, a fixed capacity consumption to reflect plant setup and a non-linear capacity-consumption function of the total product portfolio allocated to the plant. To develop the capacity consumption function the authors build product families with similar processing requirements and consider effects from intra- and inter-product family interactions. Based on a linear relaxation the authors explore both tabu-search heuristics and branch-and-bound algorithms to obtain solutions. [Pg.78]

With all these models, the simple ones as well as the spectra, it has to be supposed that stress and strain are, at any time, proportional, so that the relaxation function E(t) and the creep function D(t) are independent of the levels of deformation and stress, respectively. When this is the case, we have linear viscoelastic behaviour. Then the so-called superposition principle holds, as formulated by Boltzmann. This describes the effect of changes in external conditions of a viscoelastic system at different points in time. Such a change may be the application of a stress or also an imposed deformation. [Pg.108]

A quantitative analysis of the shape of the decay curve is not always straightforward due to the complex origin of the relaxation function itself [20, 36, 63-66] and the structural heterogeneity of the long chain molecules. Nevertheless, several examples of the detection of structural heterogeneity by T2 experiments have been published, for example the analysis of the gel/sol content in cured [65, 67] and filled elastomers [61, 62], the estimation of the fraction of chain-end blocks in linear and network elastomers [66, 68, 69], and the determination of a distribution function for the molecular mass of network chains in crosslinked elastomers [70, 71]. [Pg.364]

An alternative approach to DS study is to examine the dynamic molecular properties of a substance directly in the time domain. In the linear response approximation, the fluctuations of polarization caused by thermal motion are the same as for the macroscopic rearrangements induced by the electric field [27,28], Thus, one can equate the relaxation function < )(t) and the macroscopic dipole correlation function (DCF) V(t) as follows ... [Pg.10]

One may use the linear viscoelastic data as a pure rheological characterization, and relate the viscoelastic parameters to some processing or final properties of the material inder study. Furthermore, linear viscoelasticity and nonlinear viscoelasticity are not different fields that would be disconnected in most cases, a linear viscoelastic function (relaxation fimction, memory function or distribution of relaxation times) is used as the kernel of non linear constitutive equations, either of the differential or integral form. That means that if we could define a general nonlinear constitutive equation that would work for all flexible chains, the knowledge of a single linear viscoelastic function would lead to all rheological properties. [Pg.95]

One may also use a memory function m(t) within the integral formulation of linear and nonlinear viscoelasticity this memory fimction m(t), which is the derivative of the relaxation function GKt), is not a measurable function. [Pg.97]

We have reported on Fig. 16 the complex shear modulus of two star-branched polybutadiene samples at 25°C. The hill lines have been calculated using the Ball and Mac Leish model for the terminal relaxation region, whereas the same relaxation functions as for the linear polymers have been used regarding the A, B and glass transition domains. [Pg.118]

In the present section, it is demonstrated how the linear response of an assembly of noninteracting polar Brownian particles to a small external field F applied parallel and perpendicular to the bias field Fo may be calculated in the context of the fractional noninertial rotational diffusion in the same manner as normal rotational diffusion [8]. In order to carry out the calculation, it is assumed that the rotational Brownian motion of a particle may be described by a fractional noninertial Fokker-Planck (Smoluchowski) equation, in which the inertial effects are neglected. Both exact and approximate solutions of this equation are presented. We shall demonstrate that the characteristic times of the normal diffusion process, namely, the integral and effective relaxation times obtained in Refs. 8, 65, and 67, allow one to evaluate the dielectric response for anomalous diffusion. Moreover, these characteristic times yield a simple analytical equation for the complex dielectric susceptibility tensor describing the anomalous relaxation of the system. The exact solution of the problem reduces to the solution of the infinite hierarchies of differential-recurrence equations for the corresponding relaxation functions. The longitudinal and transverse components of the susceptibility tensor may be calculated exactly from the Laplace transform of these relaxation functions using linear response theory [72]. [Pg.338]

The evolution of the many-molecule dynamics, with more and more units participating in the motion with increasing time, is mirrored directly in colloidal suspensions of particles using confocal microscopy [213]. The correlation function of the dynamically heterogeneous a-relaxation is stretched over more decades of time than the linear exponential Debye relaxation function as a consequence of the intermolecularly cooperative dynamics. Other multidimensional NMR experiments [226] have shown that molecular reorientation in the heterogeneous a-relaxation occurs by relatively small jump angles, conceptually simlar to the primitive relaxation or as found experimentally for the JG relaxation [227]. [Pg.530]

The proposed method of data treatment has two advantages (1) It allows assessment of the status of blend miscibility In the melt, and (11) It permits computation of any linear viscoelastic function from a single frequency scan. Once the numerical values of Equation 20 or Equation 21 parameters are established Che relaxation spectrum as well as all linear viscoelastic functions of the material are known. Since there Is a direct relation between the relaxation and Che retardation time spectra, one can compute from Hq(o)) the stress growth function, creep compliance, complex dynamic compliances, etc. [Pg.171]

Actually, up to the present time, many-body relaxation is still an unsolved problem in condensed matter physics. In his magical year of 1905, Einstein solved the problem of diffusion of pollen particles in water discovered in 1827 by the botanist, Robert Brown. In this Brownian diffusion problem, the diffusing particles are far apart and do not interact with each other and the correlation function is the linear exponential function, exp(-t/r). It is by far simpler a problem than the interacting many-body relaxation/diffusion problem involved in glass transition. It is a pity that Einstein in 1905 was unaware of the experimental work of R. Kohlrausch and his intriguing stretch exponential relaxation function, exp[-(t/r) ], published in 1847 and followed by other publications by his son, F. Kohlrausch. [Pg.25]

Thus, once the four parameters of Eq 7.42 are known, the relaxation spectrum, and then any linear viscoelastic function can be calculated. For example, the experimental data of the dynamic storage and loss shear moduli, respectively G and G , or the linear viscoelastic stress growth function in shear or uniaxial elongation can be computed from the dependencies [Utracki and Schlund, 1987] ... [Pg.484]

Once these parameters are known, the Gross frequency relaxation spectrum can be calculated (see Eqs 7.85-7.87) and as a result all linear viscoelastic functions. [Pg.513]

The linear viscoelastic behavior of the pure polymer and blends has already been described quantitatively by using models of molecular dynamics based on the reptation concept [12]. To describe the rheological behavior of the copolymers in this study, we have selected and extended the analytical approach of Be-nallal et al. [13], who describe the relaxation function G(t) of Hnear homopolymer melts as the sum of four independent relaxation processes [Eq. (1)]. Each term describes the relaxation domains extending from the lowest frequencies (Gc(t)) to the highest frequencies (Ghf( )), and is well defined for homopolymers in Ref [13]. [Pg.236]


See other pages where Linear relaxation function is mentioned: [Pg.268]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.867]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.702]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.212]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.159 ]




SEARCH



Linear functional

Linear functionals

Linear functions

© 2024 chempedia.info