Kinetic rate equations, diffusion control

Similarly to the response at hydrodynamic electrodes, linear and cyclic potential sweeps for simple electrode reactions will yield steady-state voltammograms with forward and reverse scans retracing one another, provided the scan rate is slow enough to maintain the steady state [28, 35, 36, 37 and 38]. The limiting current will be detemiined by the slowest step in the overall process, but if the kinetics are fast, then the current will be under diffusion control and hence obey the above equation for a disc. The slope of the wave in the absence of IR drop will, once again, depend on the degree of reversibility of the electrode process. 

Figure 10 shows that Tj is a unique function of the Thiele modulus. When the modulus ( ) is small (- SdSl), the effectiveness factor is unity, which means that there is no effect of mass transport on the rate of the catalytic reaction. When ( ) is greater than about 1, the effectiveness factor is less than unity and the reaction rate is influenced by mass transport in the pores. When the modulus is large (- 10), the effectiveness factor is inversely proportional to the modulus, and the reaction rate (eq. 19) is proportional to k ( ), which, from the definition of ( ), implies that the rate and the observed reaction rate constant are proportional to (1 /R)(f9This result shows that both the rate constant, ie, a measure of the intrinsic activity of the catalyst, and the effective diffusion coefficient, ie, a measure of the resistance to transport of the reactant offered by the pore stmcture, influence the rate. It is not appropriate to say that the reaction is diffusion controlled it depends on both the diffusion and the chemical kinetics. In contrast, as shown by equation 3, a reaction in solution can be diffusion controlled, depending on D but not on k. 

In these circumstances a decision must be made which of two (or more) kinet-ically equivalent rate terms should be included in the rate equation and the kinetic scheme (It will seldom be justified to include both terms, certainly not on kinetic grounds.) A useful procedure is to evaluate the rate constant using both of the kinetically equivalent forms. Now if one of these constants (for a second-order reaction) is greater than about 10 ° M s-, the corresponding rate term can be rejected. This criterion is based on the theoretical estimate of a diffusion-controlled reaction rate (this is described in Chapter 4). It is not physically reasonable that a chemical rate constant can be larger than the diffusion rate limit. 

Analyses of rate measurements for the decomposition of a large number of basic halides of Cd, Cu and Zn did not always identify obedience to a single kinetic expression [623—625], though in many instances a satisfactory fit to the first-order equation was found. Observations for the pyrolysis of lead salts were interpreted as indications of diffusion control. More recent work [625] has been concerned with the double salts jcM(OH)2 yMeCl2 where M is Cd or Cu and Me is Ca, Cd, Co, Cu, Mg, Mn, Ni or Zn. In the M = Cd series, with the single exception of the zinc salt, reaction was dehydroxylation with concomitant metathesis and the first-order equation was obeyed. Copper (=M) salts underwent a similar change but kinetic characteristics were more diverse and examples of obedience to the first order, the phase boundary and the Avrami—Erofe ev equations [eqns. (7) and (6)] were found for salts containing the various cations (=Me). 

The water elimination reactions of Co3(P04)2 8 H20 [838], zirconium phosphate [839] and both acid and basic gallium phosphates [840] are too complicated to make kinetic studies of more than empirical value. The decomposition of the double salt, Na3NiP3O10 12 H20 has been shown [593] to obey a composite rate equation comprised of two processes, one purely chemical and the other involving diffusion control, for which E = 38 and 49 kJ mole-1, respectively. There has been a thermodynamic study of CeP04 vaporization [841]. Decomposition of metal phosphites [842] involves oxidation and anion reorganization. 

The retarding influence of the product barrier in many solid—solid interactions is a rate-controlling factor that is not usually apparent in the decompositions of single solids. However, even where diffusion control operates, this is often in addition to, and in conjunction with, geometric factors (i.e. changes in reaction interfacial area with a) and kinetic equations based on contributions from both sources are discussed in Chap. 3, Sect. 3.3. As in the decompositions of single solids, reaction rate coefficients (and the shapes of a—time curves) for solid + solid reactions are sensitive to sizes, shapes and, here, also on the relative dispositions of the components of the reactant mixture. Inevitably as the number of different crystalline components present initially is increased, the number of variables requiring specification to define the reactant completely rises the parameters concerned are mentioned in Table 17. 

The reaction of Si02 with SiC [1229] approximately obeyed the zero-order rate equation with E = 548—405 kJ mole 1 between 1543 and 1703 K. The proposed mechanism involved volatilized SiO and CO and the rate-limiting step was identified as product desorption from the SiC surface. The interaction of U02 + SiC above 1650 K [1230] obeyed the contracting area rate equation [eqn. (7), n = 2] with E = 525 and 350 kJ mole 1 for the evolution of CO and SiO, respectively. Kinetic control is identified as gas phase diffusion from the reaction site but E values were largely determined by equilibrium thermodynamics rather than by diffusion coefficients. 

Mechanisms of dissolution kinetics of crystals have been intensively studied in the pharmaceutical domain, because the rate of dissolution affects the bioavailability of drug crystals. Many efforts have been made to describe the crystal dissolution behavior. A variety of empirical or semi-empirical models have been used to describe drug dissolution or release from formulations [1-6]. Noyes and Whitney published the first quantitative study of the dissolution process in 1897 [7]. They found that the dissolution process is diffusion controlled and involves no chemical reaction. The Noyes-Whitney equation simply states that the dissolution rate is directly proportional to the difference between the solubility and the solution concentration ... 

When considering the macrokinetics of PAR described by equations (Eq. 17), it is reasonable to focus on two limiting regimes. The first of these, the kinetically-controlled regime, takes place provided the rate of diffusion of molecules Z appreciably exceeds that of the chemical reaction. In this case, a uniform concentration Z = Ze should be established all over the globule after time interval t R2/D. Subsequently, during the interval t 1 /kZe, which is considerably larger than f[Pg.152]

The cyclohexadienyl radicals decay by second-order kinetics, as proven by the absorption decay, with almost diffusion-controlled rate (2k = 2.8 x 109 M 1 s 1). The cyclohexyl radicals 3 and 4 decay both in pseudo-first-order bimolecular reaction with the 1,4-cyclohexadiene to give the cyclohexadienyl radical 5 and cyclohexene (or its hydroxy derivative) (equation 15) and in a second order bimolecular reaction of two radicals. The cyclohexene (or its hydroxy derivative) can be formed also in a reaction of radical 3 or... 

Photosensitization of diaryliodonium salts by anthracene occurs by a photoredox reaction in which an electron is transferred from an excited singlet or triplet state of the anthracene to the diaryliodonium initiator.13"15,17 The lifetimes of the anthracene singlet and triplet states are on the order of nanoseconds and microseconds respectively, and the bimolecular electron transfer reactions between the anthracene and the initiator are limited by the rate of diffusion of reactants, which in turn depends upon the system viscosity. In this contribution, we have studied the effects of viscosity on the rate of the photosensitization reaction of diaryliodonium salts by anthracene. Using steady-state fluorescence spectroscopy, we have characterized the photosensitization rate in propanol/glycerol solutions of varying viscosities. The results were analyzed using numerical solutions of the photophysical kinetic equations in conjunction with the mathematical relationships provided by the Smoluchowski16 theory for the rate constants of the diffusion-controlled bimolecular reactions. 

The Smoluchowski theory for diffusion-controlled reactions, when combined with the Stokes-Einstein equation for the diffusion coefficient, predicts that the rate constant for a diffusion-controlled reaction will be inversely proportional to the solution viscosity.16 Therefore, the literature values for the bimolecular electron transfer reactions (measured for a solution viscosity of r ) were adjusted by multiplying by the factor r 1/r 2 to obtain the adjusted value of the kinetic constant... 

The experimental and simulation results presented here indicate that the system viscosity has an important effect on the overall rate of the photosensitization of diary liodonium salts by anthracene. These studies reveal that as the viscosity of the solvent is increased from 1 to 1000 cP, the overall rate of the photosensitization reaction decreases by an order of magnitude. This decrease in reaction rate is qualitatively explained using the Smoluchowski-Stokes-Einstein model for the rate constants of the bimolecular, diffusion-controlled elementary reactions in the numerical solution of the kinetic photophysical equations. A more quantitative fit between the experimental data and the simulation results was obtained by scaling the bimolecular rate constants by rj"07 rather than the rf1 as suggested by the Smoluchowski-Stokes-Einstein analysis. These simulation results provide a semi-empirical correlation which may be used to estimate the effective photosensitization rate constant for viscosities ranging from 1 to 1000 cP. 

An alternative electrochemical method has recently been used to obtain the standard potentials of a series of 31 PhO /PhO- redox couples (13). This method uses conventional cyclic voltammetry, and it is based on the CV s obtained on alkaline solutions of the phenols. The observed CV s are completely irreversible and simply show a wave corresponding to the one-electron oxidation of PhO-. The irreversibility is due to the rapid homogeneous decay of the PhO radicals produced, such that no reverse wave can be detected. It is well known that PhO radicals decay with second-order kinetics and rate constants close to the diffusion-controlled limit. If the mechanism of the electrochemical oxidation of PhO- consists of diffusion-limited transfer of the electron from PhO- to the electrode and the second-order decay of the PhO radicals, the following equation describes the scan-rate dependence of the peak potential ... 

If Da = 1 is defined as the transition between diffusionally controlled and kinetically controlled regimes, an inverse relationship is observed between the particle diameter and the system pressure and temperature for a fixed Da. Thus, for a system to be kinetically controlled, combustion temperatures need to be low (or the particle size has to be very small, so that the diffusive time scales are short relative to the kinetic time scale). Often for small particle diameters, the particle loses so much heat, so rapidly, that extinction occurs. Thus, the particle temperature is nearly the same as the gas temperature and to maintain a steady-state burning rate in the kinetically controlled regime, the ambient temperatures need to be high enough to sustain reaction. The above equation also shows that large particles at high pressure likely experience diffusion-controlled combustion, and small particles at low pressures often lead to kinetically controlled combustion. 

If the electrostatic barrier is removed either by specific ion adsorption or by addition of electrolyte, the rate of coagulation (often followed by measuring changes in turbidity) can be described fairly well from simple diffusion-controlled kinetics and the assumption that all collisions lead to adhesion and particle growth. Overbeek (1952) has derived a simple equation to relate the rate of coagulation to the magnitude of the repulsive barrier. The equation is written in terms of the stability ratio ... 

---