Diffusion rate, equation

The diffusion of the developer to the resist surface can be described with a simple diffusion rate equation as... 

Following Equation (5.29), the change of the particle diameter during burnout is only respected in the diffusion rate (Equation (5.24)) and can be included in the effectiveness fector. A much more elegant approach is to use particle burnout models that related to geometry. 

The diffusion rate equation is given by Tick s law of diffusion, which expresses the transfer of a species i in a mixture of i and... 

Since the fluid is stationary at the solid surface, the mass of species i is transferred by molecular diffusion normal to the surface and is expressed by the diffusion rate equation (Equation 1.78) as... 

Rate equations 28 and 30 combine the advantages of concentration-independent mass transfer coefficients, even in situations of multicomponent diffusion, and a familiar mathematical form involving concentration driving forces. The main inconvenience is the use of an effective diffusivity which may itself depend somewhat on the mixture composition and in certain cases even on the diffusion rates. This advantage can be eliminated by working with a different form of the MaxweU-Stefan equation (30—32). One thus obtains a set of rate equations of an unconventional form having concentration-independent mass transfer coefficients that are defined for each binary pair directiy based on the MaxweU-Stefan diffusivities. 

Xm are not. For unimolecular diffusion through stagnant gas = 1), and reduce to T and X and and reduce to and equation 64 then becomes equation 34. For equimolar counterdiffusion = 0, and the variables reduce tojy, x, G, and F, respectively, and equation 64 becomes equation 35. Using the film factor concept and rate equation 28, the tower height may be computed by... 

The defects generated in ion—soHd interactions influence the kinetic processes that occur both inside and outside the cascade volume. At times long after the cascade lifetime (t > 10 s), the remaining vacancy—interstitial pairs can contribute to atomic diffusion processes. This process, commonly called radiation enhanced diffusion (RED), can be described by rate equations and an analytical approach (27). Within the cascade itself, under conditions of high defect densities, local energy depositions exceed 1 eV/atom and local kinetic processes can be described on the basis of ahquid-like diffusion formalism (28,29). 

Using this simplified model, CP simulations can be performed easily as a function of solution and such operating variables as pressure, temperature, and flow rate, usiag software packages such as Mathcad. Solution of the CP equation (eq. 8) along with the solution—diffusion transport equations (eqs. 5 and 6) allow the prediction of CP, rejection, and permeate flux as a function of the Reynolds number, Ke. To faciUtate these calculations, the foUowiag data and correlations can be used (/) for mass-transfer correlation, the Sherwood number, Sb, is defined as Sh = 0.04 S c , where Sc is the Schmidt... 

Low-PressureAlulticomponent Mixtures These methods are outlined in Table 5-17. Stefan-MaxweU equations were discussed earlier. Smith-Taylor compared various methods for predicting multi-component diffusion rates and found that Eq. (5-204) was superior among the effective diffusivity approaches, though none is very good. They so found that hnearized and exact solutions are roughly equivalent and accurate. 

In ion-exchange resins, diffusion is further complicated by electrical coupling effec ts. In a system with M counterions, diffusion rates are described by the Nernst-Planck equations (Helfferich, gen. refs.). Assuming complete Donnan exclusion, these equations canbe written... 

For noncoustaut diffusivity, a numerical solution of the conseiwa-tion equations is generally required. In molecular sieve zeohtes, when equilibrium is described by the Langmuir isotherm, the concentration dependence of the intracrystalline diffusivity can often be approximated by Eq. (16-72). The relevant rate equation is ... 

Asymptotic Solution Rate equations for the various mass-transfer mechanisms are written in dimensionless form in Table 16-13 in terms of a number of transfer units, N = L/HTU, for particle-scale mass-transfer resistances, a number of reaction units for the reaction kinetics mechanism, and a number of dispersion units, Np, for axial dispersion. For pore and sohd diffusion, q = / // p is a dimensionless radial coordinate, where / p is the radius of the particle, if a particle is bidisperse, then / p can be replaced by the radius of a suoparticle. For prehminary calculations. Fig. 16-13 can be used to estimate N for use with the LDF approximation when more than one resistance is important. 

Lenhoff, J. Chromatogr., 384, 285 (1987)] or by direct numerical solution of the conservation and rate equations. For the special case of no-axial dispersion with external mass transfer and pore diffusion, an explicit time-domain solution, useful for the case of time-periodic injections, is also available [Carta, Chem. Eng. Sci, 43, 2877 (1988)]. In most cases, however, when N > 50, use of Eq. (16-161), or (16-172) and (16-174) with N 2Np calculated from Eq. (16-181) provides an approximation sufficiently accurate for most practical purposes. 

The partial pressures in the rate equations are those in the vicinity of the catalyst surface. In the presence of diffusional resistance, in the steady state the rate of diffusion through the stagnant film equals the rate of chemical reaction. For the reaction A -1- B C -1-. . . , with rate of diffusion of A limited. 

Kinetic theories of adsorption, desorption, surface diffusion, and surface reactions can be grouped into three categories. (/) At the macroscopic level one proceeds to write down kinetic equations for macroscopic variables, in particular rate equations for the (local) coverage or for partial coverages. This can be done in a heuristic manner, much akin to procedures in gas-phase kinetics or, in a rigorous approach, using the framework of nonequihbrium thermodynamics. Such an approach can be used as long as... 

In these circumstances a decision must be made which of two (or more) kinet-ically equivalent rate terms should be included in the rate equation and the kinetic scheme (It will seldom be justified to include both terms, certainly not on kinetic grounds.) A useful procedure is to evaluate the rate constant using both of the kinetically equivalent forms. Now if one of these constants (for a second-order reaction) is greater than about 10 ° M s-, the corresponding rate term can be rejected. This criterion is based on the theoretical estimate of a diffusion-controlled reaction rate (this is described in Chapter 4). It is not physically reasonable that a chemical rate constant can be larger than the diffusion rate limit. 

In Section 3-3 we discussed the problem of kinetically equivalent rate terms. Suppose one of the rate constants evaluated for such a rate equation were larger than the diffusion-limited value this is a reasonable basis upon which to reject the formulation of the rate equation leading to this result. Jencks has given examples of this argument. 

The water elimination reactions of Co3(P04)2 8 H20 [838], zirconium phosphate [839] and both acid and basic gallium phosphates [840] are too complicated to make kinetic studies of more than empirical value. The decomposition of the double salt, Na3NiP3O10 12 H20 has been shown [593] to obey a composite rate equation comprised of two processes, one purely chemical and the other involving diffusion control, for which E = 38 and 49 kJ mole-1, respectively. There has been a thermodynamic study of CeP04 vaporization [841]. Decomposition of metal phosphites [842] involves oxidation and anion reorganization. 

The reaction of Si02 with SiC [1229] approximately obeyed the zero-order rate equation with E = 548—405 kJ mole 1 between 1543 and 1703 K. The proposed mechanism involved volatilized SiO and CO and the rate-limiting step was identified as product desorption from the SiC surface. The interaction of U02 + SiC above 1650 K [1230] obeyed the contracting area rate equation [eqn. (7), n = 2] with E = 525 and 350 kJ mole 1 for the evolution of CO and SiO, respectively. Kinetic control is identified as gas phase diffusion from the reaction site but E values were largely determined by equilibrium thermodynamics rather than by diffusion coefficients. 

We first explain the setting of reactors for all CFD simulations. We used Fluent 6.2 as a CFD code. Each reactant fluid is split into laminated fluid segments at the reactor inlet. The flow in reactors was assumed to be laminar flow. Thus, the reactants mix only by molecular diffusion, and reactions take place fi om the interface between each reactant fluid. The reaction formulas and the rate equations of multiple reactions proceeding in reactors were as follows A + B R, ri = A iCaCb B + R S, t2 = CbCr, where R was the desired product and S was the by-product. The other assumptions were as follows the diffusion coefficient of every component was 10" m /s the reactants reacted isothermally, that is, k was fixed at... 

---