Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Kinetic model function determination

Computer control of the operating parameters to maintain setpoints, the use of off-line kinetic models to determine operating conditions, and the use of online models to make predictions of the intermediate parameters and the final product properties as a function of the operating history have all become commonplace in industry over the last 30 years. This certainly has had a strong influence on the improvements in product quality and uniformity and the large increases in production rate that have occurred over this period of time. [Pg.71]

Therefore, the trial model function will in general be a nonlinear function of the independent variable, time. Various mathematical procedures are available for iterative x2 minimization of nonlinear functions. The widely used Marquardt procedure is robust and efficient. Not all the parameters in the model function need to be determined by iteration. Any kinetic model function such as Equation 3.9 consists of a mixture of linear parameters, the amplitudes of the absorbance changes, A and nonlinear parameters, the rate constants, kb For a given set of kb the linear parameters, A, can be determined without iteration (as in any linear regression) and they can, therefore, be eliminated from the parameter space in the nonlinear least-squares search. This increases reliability in determining the global minimum and reduces the required computing time considerably. [Pg.102]

Determination of the kinetic model function, f (a)—Once the activation energy has been determined, it is possible to search for the most suitable kinetic models which are listed in Table 3.9. Two special functions, Y( ) and Z ), which can easily be obtained by simple transformation of the experimental data, are defined for this purpose. These two functions can be formulated as follows ... [Pg.58]

Radial density gradients in FCC and other large-diameter pneumatic transfer risers reflect gas—soHd maldistributions and reduce product yields. Cold-flow units are used to measure the transverse catalyst profiles as functions of gas velocity, catalyst flux, and inlet design. Impacts of measured flow distributions have been evaluated using a simple four lump kinetic model and assuming dispersed catalyst clusters where all the reactions are assumed to occur coupled with a continuous gas phase. A 3 wt % conversion advantage is determined for injection feed around the riser circumference as compared with an axial injection design (28). [Pg.513]

The glycolysis of PETP was studied in a batch reactor at 265C. The reaction extent in the initial period was determined as a function of reaction time using a thermogravimetric technique. The rate data were shown to fit a second order kinetic model at small reaction times. An initial glycolysis rate was calculated from the model and was found to be over four times greater than the initial rate of hydrolysis under the same reaction conditions. 4 refs. [Pg.94]

Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of carbon from propane is the main reaction in the fabrication of the C/C composites [1,2] and the C-SiC functionally graded material [3,4,5]. The carbon deposition rate from propane is high compared with those from other aliphatic hydrocarbons [4]. Propane is rapidly decomposed in the gas phase and various hydrocarbons are formed independently of the film growth in the CVD reactor. The propane concentration distribution is determined by the gas-phase kinetics. The gas-phase reaction model, in addition to the film growth reaction model, is required for the numerical simulation of the CVD reactor for designing and controlling purposes. Therefore, a compact gas-phase reaction model is preferred. The authors proposed the procedure to reduce an elementary reaction model consisting of hundreds of reactions to a compact model objectively [6]. In this study, the procedure is applied to propane pyrolysis for carbon CVD and a compact gas-phase reaction model is built by the proposed procedure and the kinetic parameters are determined from the experimental results. [Pg.217]

Note in Table 5.10 that many of the integrals are common to different kinetic models. This is specific to this reaction where all the stoichiometric coefficients are unity and the initial reaction mixture was equimolar. In other words, the change in the number of moles is the same for all components. Rather than determine the integrals analytically, they could have been determined numerically. Analytical integrals are simply more convenient if they can be obtained, especially if the model is to be fitted in a spreadsheet, rather than purpose-written software. The least squares fit varies the reaction rate constants to minimize the objective function ... [Pg.89]

The kinetics of the CTMAB thermal decomposition has been studied by the non-parametric kinetics (NPK) method [6-8], The kinetic analysis has been performed separately for process I and process II in the appropriate a regions. The NPK method for the analysis of non-isothermal TG data is based on the usual assumption that the reaction rate can be expressed as a product of two independent functions,/ and h(T), where f(a) accounts for the kinetic model while the temperature-dependent function, h(T), is usually the Arrhenius equation h(T) = k = A exp(-Ea / RT). The reaction rates, da/dt, measured from several experiments at different heating rates, can be expressed as a three-dimensional surface determined by the temperature and the conversion degree. This is a model-free method since it yields the temperature dependence of the reaction rate without having to make any prior assumptions about the kinetic model. [Pg.227]

Experimental determination of Ay for a reaction requires the rate constant k to be determined at different pressures, k is obtained as a fit parameter by the reproduction of the experimental kinetic data with a suitable model. The data are the concentration of the reactants or of the products, or any other coordinate representing their concentration, as a function of time. The choice of a kinetic model for a solid-state chemical reaction is not trivial because many steps, having comparable rates, may be involved in making the kinetic law the superposition of the kinetics of all the different, and often unknown, processes. The evolution of the reaction should be analyzed considering all the fundamental aspects of condensed phase reactions and, in particular, beside the strictly chemical transformations, also the diffusion (transport of matter to and from the reaction center) and the nucleation processes. [Pg.153]

In traditional process control, models are often used to predict the deviation of the controlled variable from the desired state, the process error. This assumes that one knows the desired state. In complex batch processes, the desired state of the process is also dependent on history and changing dynamically. Further, most process models have to predict the outcome of an entire cycle to determine if the product will be good, so predictions are not available in real time, even for a slow process like the autoclave cure however, partial models have been used as virtual sensors to expand on the information available from sensors [38]. Saliba et al. used a kinetic model to predict the degree of cure as a function of time and temperature in a mold and used that predicted degree of cure to time pressure application and determine the completion of cure. Others [39] have used the predictions of models together with the measured progress of the process to predict future trends and even project process outcomes. [Pg.466]

The determination of the evolution of concentrations of different species and functional groups enables one to discern different paths present in the reaction mechanism. For example, Fig. 5.13 shows that as the molar ratio of styrene to polyester C=C double bonds (MR) increases from 1/1 to 4/1, the curves tend to shift downward. For MR = 4/1 there is a very low styrene consumption until the polyester double bonds are converted to 40%. On the other hand, SEM (scanning electron microscopy) shows phase separation of a UP-rich phase in the early stages of the polymerization. Most radicals are probably trapped in this phase, which explains the higher initial conversion of the UP double bonds than styrene double bonds. A kinetic model would have to take this observation into account. [Pg.183]

When several temperature-dependent rate constants have been determined or at least estimated, the adherence of the decay in the system to Arrhenius behavior can be easily determined. If a plot of these rate constants vs. reciprocal temperature (1/7) produces a linear correlation, the system is adhering to the well-studied Arrhenius kinetic model and some prediction of the rate of decay at any temperature can be made. As detailed in Figure 17, Carstensen s adaptation of data, originally described by Tardif (99), demonstrates the pseudo-first-order decay behavior of the decomposition of ascorbic acid in solid dosage forms at temperatures of 50° C, 60°C, and 70°C (100). Further analysis of the data confirmed that the system adhered closely to Arrhenius behavior as the plot of the rate constants with respect to reciprocal temperature (1/7) showed linearity (Fig. 18). Carsten-sen suggests that it is not always necessary to determine the mechanism of decay if some relevant property of the degradation can be explained as a function of time, and therefore logically quantified and rationally predicted. [Pg.450]

Sufficient DO data were not obtained from basalt-synthetic Grande Ronde groundwater experiments to allow determination of a definitive rate law. A first order kinetic model with respect to DO concentration was assumed. Rate control by diffusion kinetics and by surface-reaction mechanisms result in solution composition cnanges with different surface area and time dependencies (32,39). Therefore, by varying reactant surface area, determination of the proper functional form of the integrated rate equation for basalt-water redox reactions is possible. [Pg.189]

Many aspects related to optimization of the ethanol production process have been addressed in previous works. A key to the optimization of a process is a thorough understanding of the system s dynamics, which can be obtained using an accurate model of the process. Atala et al. (1) developed a mathematical model for the alcoholic fermentation based on fundamental mass balances. The kinetic parameters were determined from experimental data and were described as functions of the temperature. The experiments were conducted with high biomass concentration and sugarcane molasses as substrate to simulate the real conditions in industrial units. [Pg.486]

The properties of wood(7,14) were used to analyze time scales of physical and chemical processes during wood pyrolysis as done in Russel, et al (15) for coal. Even at combustion level heat fluxes, intraparticle heat transfer is one to two orders of magnitude slower than mass transfer (volatiles outflow) or chemical reaction. A mathematical model reflecting these facts is briefly presented here and detailed elsewhere(16). It predicts volatiles release rate and composition as a function of particle physical properties, and simulates the experiments described herein in order to determine adequate kinetic models for individual product formation rates. [Pg.460]

This simple analysis is semi empirical it is not a description of the diffusion limited reaction within the crystals but allows one to take into account both phenomena, in order to provide kinetic models for FCC reactor description [11]. Experimental results on the three feedstocks are shown in figure 1, with the deactivation function determined according to the method described in [10]. Curves are calculated from equation (3) after fitting E and F. These values are reported in table 2. [Pg.251]

Figure 5 shows the simulation of the reaction kinetic model for VO-TPP hydro-demetallisation at the reference temperature using a Be the network with coordination 6. The metal deposition profiles are shown as a function of pellet radius and time in case of zero concentration of the intermediates at the edge of the pellet. Computer simulations were ended when pore plugging occurred. It is observed that for the bulk diffusion coefficient of this reacting system the metal deposition maximum occurs at the centre of the catalyst pellet, indicating that the deposition process is reaction rate-determined. The reactants and intermediates can reach the centre of the pellet easily due to the absence of diffusion limitations. [Pg.340]

Finally, the enzyme deactivation in the EMR could be modeled by a first-order linear dependence with respect to H2O2 addition rate [19]. The integration of this equation in the kinetic model allows simulation of the process efficiency as a function of H2O2 addition rate, HRT, and Orange II concentration in the influent, and helps determine the best operational conditions. [Pg.273]

The calculations of the statistical characteristics of such polymers within the framework of the kinetic models different from the terminal one do not present any difficulties at all. So in the case of the penultimate model, Harwood [193-194] worked out a special computer program for calculating the dependencies of the sequences probabilities on conversion. Within the framework of this model, Eq. (5.2) can be integrated in terms of the elementary functions as it was done earlier [177] in order to calculate copolymer composition distribution in the case of the simplified (r 2 = Fj) penultimate model. In the framework of the latter the possibility of the existence of systems with two azeotropes was proved for the first time and the regions of the reactivity ratios of such systems [6] were determined. In a general version of the penultimate model (2.3-24) the azeotropic compositions x = 1/(1 + 0 ) are determined [6] by the positive roots 0 =0 of the following... [Pg.33]

On the other hand, the bottom-up approach describes the system s behavior using information about the properties of parts. We rely on the properties of isolated parts. Using kinetic modeling and measuring the parameters that characterize the rates, we can determine the capacities of the parts. The behavior of the whole system is in part a function of these properties. [Pg.562]


See other pages where Kinetic model function determination is mentioned: [Pg.335]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.88]   


SEARCH



Determinant function

Function kinetic

Functional determinant

Functional modeling

Functional models

Functionality determination

Kinetic determinations

Kinetic model function

Model function

© 2024 chempedia.info