Judgment kinetics

Most of the DSC equipment can be used in the temperature range of 25°C to 500°C. Most can be cooled as well, a feature required for investigating samples that are unstable at ambient conditions. DSC equipment is usually sufficient for indicating thermal hazards of stirred systems and small-scale unstirred systems provided the reaction is kinetically controlled under normal operating conditions, but the resulting data must be used with careful judgment if mixing or mass transport are important. 

KEMI (2003) noted that route-to-route extrapolation can only be performed in the case of systemic toxicity and that possible local toxicity in the airways cannot be detected. Not only the degree of absorption but also metabolism should be considered, as, e.g., compounds may be highly metabolized in the liver due to first-pass effect in case of oral exposure but much less metabolized in the case of other routes of exposure. KEMI also noted that there are databased distributions of NOAEL ratios from different routes of exposure, but the size and reliability of this database are limited and they therefore suggested that these distributions should not be used. KEMI suggested that kinetic data are required if possible and that route-to-route extrapolation should be performed in a case-by-case manner based on expert judgment of scientific information. In case no data are available to base the extrapolation upon, 100% should be used as the default degree of absorption. It was emphasized that this default level is generally very conservative in the case of dermal exposure, while in case of inhalation exposure, this default level may not be conservative at all and may even be the opposite. 

The emphasis of this book is entirely on analytical, mechanistic (homogeneous), kinetic (homogeneous), and synthetic (laboratory-scale) applications. Physical electrochemistry is not a direct concern, and equilibrium methods (potentiometry) are intentionally omitted. There is no attempt to include specific chemical examples except where they are particularly illustrative and have pedagogical value. No extensive review of the original literature is included, but references to key reviews and papers of historical interest are emphasized. Authors have selected experimental approaches that work best and have commented freely on outmoded or underdeveloped methods. The authors and editors have made value judgments that undoubtedly will disappoint some readers. 

Thus, due to the shortcomings of currently available statistical procedures and the restricted data included in many reports of kinetic studies, it is at present impracticable to calculate a parameter that provides a realistic measure of the accuracy of obedience of (log A, E) values to the compensation equation. While this objective may become realizable in the future, we are at present restricted to the use of the linear regression formula as a semiquanti-tative approximation. Results obtained using this approach, in a comparative analysis of the kinetic data available in the literature for a wide variety of surface reactions, are tabulated in Section III and some judgments concerning the relative accuracy of fit of data for different systems to Eq. (2) can be made. Interpretation of the significance of the observed trends must include consideration of the possibilities that the observed relationships... 

Uncertainty and disturbances can be described in terms of mathematical constraints defining a finite set of hounded regions for the allowable values of the uncertain parameters of the model and the parameters defining the disturbances. If uncertainty or disturbances were unbounded, it would not make sense to try to ensure satisfaction of performance requirements for all possible plant parameters and disturbances. If the uncertainty cannot be related mathematically to model parameters, the model cannot adequately predict the effect of uncertainty on performance. The simplest form of description arises when the model is developed so that the uncertainty and disturbances can be mapped to independent, bounded variations on model parameters. This last stage is not essential to the method, but it does fit many process engineering problems and allows particularly efficient optimization methods to be deployed. Some parameter variations are naturally bounded e.g.. feed properties and measurement errors should be bounded by the quality specification of the supplier. Other parameter variations require a mixture of judgment and experiment to define, e.g., kinetic parameters. 

In the authors judgment, catalytic action in the strict sense of the term, implying regeneration of the catalyst, has been rigorously proven in two cases. With other reactions, however, true catalysis has not been unequivocally established. Michaelis-Menten kinetics, indicative of the formation of a substrate-polymer complex, has been shown with each type of reaction. Some of the activities have been very weak, with reaction times for incomplete conversion of substrate measured in days. Others, although not as rapid as enzyme-catalyzed rates, are relatively fast, e.g., the catalytic decarboxylation of OAA by equimolar amounts of lysine residue in polymeric form was over 90% complete in less than 1 hour. 

In summary, the kinetics of the combustion process is important with regard to sulfur removal. The kinetics must be considered either by modelling or experimentation before a final judgment on desulfurization in a slagging, cyclone combustor can be made. The results of this study show that it is... 

Frequently, the next step after numerically solving a chemical kinetic simulation is to compare the model predictions with some experimental data, to check whether it is consistent with reality at least in one case. This is called validating the model. In the 20th century, it was a common practice to plot chemical kinetic model predictions with some experimental data, without any attempt to indicate the uncertainties in either. The reader then had to make his or her own judgment about whether the model and the data were close enough to be considered consistent , or whether the data had disproved the model. 

It seems that good judgment and intuition in the processing of kinetic data wit never be replaced by strictly objective methods that are capable offut automation. 

It may even be necessary to select an interpretation that is less than the best fit in terms of statistical measures of fit, a point already discussed at the end of Chapter 8. If on the other hand, the interpretation is statistically optimal and agrees with physical realities, one must expect this conclusion to be subject to independent tests, tests not connected with kinetic studies that led to the original conclusion. In all these cases the judgment of the interpreter has its place as a proper influence in the interpretation and is indispensable to the construction and verification of alternative postulates. 

Uncertainties in initial conditions and reaction rate constants lead to uncertainties in the predictions of a chemical mechanism. Quantifying the effects of possible errors or uncertainties in initial concentrations c-o and rate constants kj can be viewed in two steps. First, the probability distributions of c,o and kj, P Cio) and P kj), can be estimated. Because the true values c/o and kj are not known, estimating the uncertainties in them (and thereby estimating P[c, )) and P(kj)) necessarily requires some subjective judgments. The uncertainties in the initial concentrations can generally be estimated based on knowledge of the experimental techniques and the reproducibility of the measurements. Estimates of uncertainties in rate constants are available in periodic reviews of kinetic data (DeMore et al., 1997). 

---