Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Intermolecular energy influence

Figure 5.6 Factors determining a SAM structure solid circles, (a) Cooperative case. Molecular illustrated by the mutual influence of cove rage 9, structure allows all contributions to adopt an C-S-substrate bond angle < j and intermolecular energy minimum, (b) Competitive effect, interactions represented by distance r and their Molecular structure is such that not all dependencies on the molecular structure. For contributions can be optimized atthe same time, the different contributions the actual position of SAM structure is a result of balance of partially the system on the potential curves is indicated by opposing forces. For details see text. Figure 5.6 Factors determining a SAM structure solid circles, (a) Cooperative case. Molecular illustrated by the mutual influence of cove rage 9, structure allows all contributions to adopt an C-S-substrate bond angle < j and intermolecular energy minimum, (b) Competitive effect, interactions represented by distance r and their Molecular structure is such that not all dependencies on the molecular structure. For contributions can be optimized atthe same time, the different contributions the actual position of SAM structure is a result of balance of partially the system on the potential curves is indicated by opposing forces. For details see text.
The reaction between COF3 and the Si02 surface under the irradiation of the CO2 laser consists of two reaction paths. Namely, dehydration of the surface OH and the reaction of OH and physisorbed CDF3. For the surface reaction of OH and the CDF3, it is initiated by the excitation of physisorbed CDF3 to the first vibrational state (v=l), followed by an excitation to v=3 by an intermolecular energy transfer. These excited species react with the surface OH to form OD(ad) and CF(ad). The surface species formed by this reaction influence the absorption property of the surface and plays an Important role in the reaction after the initial stage. [Pg.338]

Heteroarornatic molecules, and particularly polycyclic arenes with N, O, or S substitution for carbon, are prone to aromatic-aromatic interactions. As the size of the x-delocalized system increases, the OFF motif prevails over EF, but because the charge distribution and occurrence of dipoles and higher electrostatic multipoles can be variable in heteroaromatics, the nature of any offset between parallel planar molecules can similarly be variable. Net charges that can occur on heteroarornatic molecules also influence intermolecular energy and geometry. [Pg.1078]

The macroconformation of a crystalline macromolecule is determined by intra- and/or intermolecular factors. Intermolecular forces influence the mutual packing of components of the chain, which leads to varying densities. The maximum difference in density found in crystalline poly-(a-olefins) corresponds, however, to an energy difference of only 1200 J/mol monomeric unit. Intermolecular forces can therefore only influence the conformation of very flexible chains, since here the conformational energies are low. The successful calculation of the macroconformations from the intramolecular forces alone, without considering intermolecular effects, also indicates the limited influence of the latter on the conformation. [Pg.107]

The distribution coefficient is an equilibrium constant and, therefore, is subject to the usual thermodynamic treatment of equilibrium systems. By expressing the distribution coefficient in terms of the standard free energy of solute exchange between the phases, the nature of the distribution can be understood and the influence of temperature on the coefficient revealed. However, the distribution of a solute between two phases can also be considered at the molecular level. It is clear that if a solute is distributed more extensively in one phase than the other, then the interactive forces that occur between the solute molecules and the molecules of that phase will be greater than the complementary forces between the solute molecules and those of the other phase. Thus, distribution can be considered to be as a result of differential molecular forces and the magnitude and nature of those intermolecular forces will determine the magnitude of the respective distribution coefficients. Both these explanations of solute distribution will be considered in this chapter, but the classical thermodynamic explanation of distribution will be treated first. [Pg.47]

Other forces can arise as a result of elastic strain on the growing film, which can be due to a surface-induced ordering in the first few layers that reverts to the bulk liquid structure at larger distances. This elastic energy is stored in intermolecular distances and orientations that are stretched or compressed from the bulk values by the influence of the substrate at short distances [7]. Similar phenomena are well known to occur in the growth of epitaxial layers in metals and semiconductors. [Pg.245]

The solution phase is modeled explicitly by the sequential addition of solution molecules in order to completely fill the vacuum region that separates repeated metal slabs (Fig. 4.2a) up to the known density of the solution. The inclusion of explicit solvent molecules allow us to directly follow the influence of specific intermolecular interactions (e.g., hydrogen bonding in aqueous systems or electron polarization of the metal surface) that influence the binding energies of different intermediates and the reaction energies and activation barriers for specific elementary steps. [Pg.97]

Based on the number of n electrons in polyenes, we can predict which type of intermolecular cycloadditions will be symmetry allowed. The close in energy the frontier orbitals are, the stronger will be the interaction between them and therefore the more easily the reaction will occur. The orbital coefficients at the interacting centres can also influence the rate and the direction of addition. [Pg.29]

Torsion around C—C and C O bonds connects different alcohol isomers. The analysis of interactions between torsional states which are concentrated in different torsional wells can provide important information on energy differences between conformations [101, 102]. Conformational isomerism in alcohols is so subtle that it cannot be easily separated from intermolecular influences in... [Pg.14]

The problem of influence of the electric field intensity on the permittivity of solvents has been discussed in many papers. The high permittivity of water results from the intermolecular forces and is a cumulative property. The electric field intensity is the lowest at the potential of zero charge (pzc), thus allowing water molecules to adsorb in clusters. When the electrode is polarized, the associated molecules, linked with hydrogen bonds, can dissociate due to a change in the energy of their interaction with the electrode. Moreover, the orientation of water molecules may also change when the potential is switched from one side of the pzc to the otha. [Pg.5]


See other pages where Intermolecular energy influence is mentioned: [Pg.18]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.1090]    [Pg.880]    [Pg.759]    [Pg.880]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.602]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.118]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.147 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info