Interference ionization

The two common sources of analytical error are interference during the analytical measurement and contamination during sample preparation. During the analytical measurement, potential interferences include, matrix effects chemical interferences, ionization interferences, and spectral interferences. 

In AAS the desired process in the atomizer should stop with the production of ground state atoms. For some elements, the process continues as shown in Fig. 6.16 to produce excited state atoms and ions. If the flame is hot enough for signfficant excitation and ionization to occur, the absorbance signal is decreased because the population of ground state atoms has decreased as a result of ionization and excitation. This is called ionization interference. Ionization interferences are commonly found for the easily ionized alkali metal and alkaline earth elements, even in cool flames. Ionization interferences for other elements may occur in the hotter nitrous oxide-acetylene flame, but not in air-acetylene flames. 

Interferences are physical or chemical processes that cause the signal from the analyte in the sample to be higher or lower than the signal from an equivalent standard. Interferences can therefore cause positive or negative errors in quantitative analysis. There are two major classes of interferences in AAS, spectral interferences and nonspectral interferences. Nonspectral interferences are those that affect the formation of analyte free atoms. Nonspectral interferences include chemical interference, ionization interference, and solvent effects (or matrix interference). Spectral interferences cause the amount of light absorbed to be erroneously high due to absorption by a species other than the analyte atom. While all techniques suffer from interferences to some extent, AAS is much less prone to spectral interferences and nonspectral interferences than atomic anission spectrometry and X-ray fluorescence (XRF), the other major optical atomic spectroscopic techniques. 

Minimizing Chemical Interferences The quantitative analysis of some elements is complicated by chemical interferences occurring during atomization. The two most common chemical interferences are the formation of nonvolatile compounds containing the analyte and ionization of the analyte. One example of a chemical interference due to the formation of nonvolatile compounds is observed when P04 or AP+ is added to solutions of Ca +. In one study, for example, adding 100 ppm AP+ to a solution of 5 ppm Ca + decreased the calcium ion s absorbance from 0.50 to 0.14, whereas adding 500 ppm POp to a similar solution of Ca + decreased the absorbance from 0.50 to 0.38. These interferences were attributed to the formation of refractory particles of Ca3(P04)2 and an Al-Ca-O oxide. 

Ionization interferences occur when thermal energy from the flame or electrothermal atomizer is sufficient to ionize the analyte... 

Thermal ionization has three distinct advantages the ability to produce mass spectra free from background interference, the ability to regulate the flow of ions by altering the filament temperature, and the possibility of changing the filament material to obtain a work function matching ionization energies. This flexibility makes thermal ionization a useful technique for the precise measurement of isotope ratios in a variety of substrates. 

A double end point, acid—base titration can be used to determine both sodium hydrosulfide and sodium sulfide content. Standardized hydrochloric acid is the titrant thymolphthalein and bromophenol blue are the indicators. Other bases having ionization constants in the ranges of the indicators used interfere with the analysis. Sodium thiosulfate and sodium thiocarbonate interfere quantitatively with the accuracy of the results. Detailed procedures to analyze sodium sulfide, sodium hydro sulfide, and sodium tetrasulfide are available (1). 

Detection limits in ICPMS depend on several factors. Dilution of the sample has a lai e effect. The amount of sample that may be in solution is governed by suppression effects and tolerable levels of dissolved solids. The response curve of the mass spectrometer has a large effect. A typical response curve for an ICPMS instrument shows much greater sensitivity for elements in the middle of the mass range (around 120 amu). Isotopic distribution is an important factor. Elements with more abundant isotopes at useful masses for analysis show lower detection limits. Other factors that affect detection limits include interference (i.e., ambiguity in identification that arises because an elemental isotope has the same mass as a compound molecules that may be present in the system) and ionization potentials. Elements that are not efficiently ionized, such as arsenic, suffer from poorer detection limits. 

Althoi h nonspectral interference effects are generally less severe in ICP-OES than in GFAA, FAA, or ICPMS, they can occur. In most cases the effects produce less than a 20% error when the sample is introduced as a liquid aerosol. High concentrations (500 ppm or greater) of elements that are highly ionized in the... 

Surface analysis by non-resonant (NR-) laser-SNMS [3.102-3.106] has been used to improve ionization efficiency while retaining the advantages of probing the neutral component. In NR-laser-SNMS, an intense laser beam is used to ionize, non-selec-tively, all atoms and molecules within the volume intersected by the laser beam (Eig. 3.40b). With sufficient laser power density it is possible to saturate the ionization process. Eor NR-laser-SNMS adequate power densities are typically achieved in a small volume only at the focus of the laser beam. This limits sensitivity and leads to problems with quantification, because of the differences between the effective ionization volumes of different elements. The non-resonant post-ionization technique provides rapid, multi-element, and molecular survey measurements with significantly improved ionization efficiency over SIMS, although it still suffers from isoba-ric interferences. 

The low solubility of fullerene (Ceo) in common organic solvents such as THE, MeCN and DCM interferes with its functionalization, which is a key step for its synthetic applications. Solid state photochemistry is a powerful strategy for overcoming this difficulty. Thus a 1 1 mixture of Cgo and 9-methylanthra-cene (Equation 4.10, R = Me) exposed to a high-pressure mercury lamp gives the adduct 72 (R = Me) with 68% conversion [51]. No 9-methylanthracene dimers were detected. Anthracene does not react with Ceo under these conditions this has been correlated to its ionization potential which is lower than that of the 9-methyl derivative. This suggests that the Diels-Alder reaction proceeds via photo-induced electron transfer from 9-methylanthracene to the triplet excited state of Ceo-... 

---