Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interference partial

Organic acids, including volatile fatty acids. Tlreir presence interferes partially with M alk measurement. They are themselves measured after hot hydrolysis at pH 3, followed by back titration according to a method specific to volatile fatty acids. Acetic (pK 4-8) and hydrocyanic (pIC 9.1) acids are also to be considered, as well as phosphorous and NH4 compounds. [Pg.34]

The goal of an analytical separation is to remove either the analyte or the interferent from the sample matrix. To achieve a separation there must be at least one significant difference between the chemical or physical properties of the analyte and interferent. Relying on chemical or physical properties, however, presents a fundamental problem—a separation also requires selectivity. A separation that completely removes an interferent may result in the partial loss of analyte. Altering the separation to minimize the loss of analyte, however, may leave behind some of the interferent. [Pg.202]

Note that a negative determinate error introduced by failing to recover all the analyte is partially offset by a positive determinate error due to a failure to remove all the interferent. [Pg.205]

An analyte and an interferent can be separated if there is a significant difference in at least one of their chemical or physical properties. Table 7.4 provides a partial list of several separation techniques, classified by the chemical or physical property that is exploited. [Pg.205]

With long-term interference by several current circuits, the corresponding partial field strengths must be determined. The resultant longitudinal field strength can be assumed to be the square root of the sum of the squares of the partial field strengths. [Pg.520]

If, however, long-term interference results from current circuits that are connected in parallel (e.g., double conductors) or from current circuits that generally exhibit the same load flow direction (e.g., power station connection conductors), then the partial field strengths have to be added. [Pg.521]

Poorly cleaned surfaces may not image well. While ordinary dry dust will be brushed aside by the tip and will not affect the image, oily or partially anchored dirt will deflect the SFM tip or interfere with the conductivity in STM. The result is usually a line smeared in the scan direction, exactly as one would expect if the tip began scanning something which moved as it was scanned. If the sample cannot be cleaned, the best procedure is to search for a clean area. [Pg.95]

In the presence of weak disorder, one should consider an additional contribution to the resistivity due to weak localisation resulting from quantum interference effects and/or that due to Coulomb interaction effects. A single-carrier weak localisation effect is produced by constructive quantum interference between elastically back-scattered partial-carrier-waves, while disorder attenuates the screening between charge carriers, thus increasing their Coulomb interaction. So, both effects are enhanced in the presence of weak disorder, or, in other words, by defect scattering. This was previously discussed for the case of carbons and graphites [7]. [Pg.111]

Most antiplatelet dtugs only partially inhibit platelet activation. In contrast, blockers of GPIIb/llla interfere at the end of the pathway common to platelet aggregation. They prevent fibrinogen and vWf from... [Pg.168]

Fig. 3. Schematic beam path of a phase-measurement interference microscope (PMIM, Fizeau optics). The beam partially reflected at the reference plane and at the sample surface interfere with each other while the reference plane is moved by the piezoelectric transducer for automatic phase determination. A reflectivity of at least 1% is required for the sample surface... Fig. 3. Schematic beam path of a phase-measurement interference microscope (PMIM, Fizeau optics). The beam partially reflected at the reference plane and at the sample surface interfere with each other while the reference plane is moved by the piezoelectric transducer for automatic phase determination. A reflectivity of at least 1% is required for the sample surface...
In Eq. (12), l,m are the photoelectron partial wave angular momentum and its projection in the molecular frame and v is the projection of the photon angular momentum on the molecular frame. The presence of an alternative primed set l, m, v signifies interference terms between the primed and unprimed partial waves. The parameter ct is the Coulomb phase shift (see Appendix A). The fi are dipole transition amplitudes to the final-state partial wave I, m and contain dynamical information on the photoionization process. In contrast, the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients (CGC) provide geometric constraints that are consequent upon angular momentum considerations. [Pg.276]

The last two CGC in Eq. (12) evidently dictate that rather different partial wave interference contributions are made to each of the angular parameters. This will impact on the dynamical information conveyed by each one. Equally important, the phase subexpression... [Pg.279]

It was shown in the preceding section that PECD can be anticipated to have an enhanced sensitivity (compared to the cross-section or p anisotropy parameter) to any small variations in the photoelectron scattering phase shifts. This is because the chiral parameter is structured from electric dipole operator interference terms between adjacent -waves, each of which depends on the sine of the associated channels relative phase shifts. In contrast, the cross-section has no phase dependence, and the p parameter has only a partial dependence on the cosine of the relative phase. The distinction between the sine... [Pg.282]

The same properties hold for colorants in food interference colors, illumination conditions, and fluorescence partially determine the appearance of food. [Pg.5]

We will see that CLS and ILS calibration modelling have limited applicability, especially when dealing with complex situations, such as highly correlated predictors (spectra), presence of chemical or physical interferents (uncontrolled and undesired covariates that affect the measurements), less samples than variables, etc. More recently, methods such as principal components regression (PCR, Section 17.8) and partial least squares regression (PLS, Section 35.7) have been... [Pg.352]

Alternatively, LC is used for the separation and quantification of PAHs using both UV and fluorescence detection. The analytes are identified based on their relative retention times and UV and/or fluorescence emission spectra. For UV detection an efficient cleanup is a prerequisite since this detection method is not very selective (almost universal for PAHs), and hence it also responds to many coeluting compounds. Due to the high specificity of fluorescence detection for most PAHs, this LC detection method is less susceptible to potential interferences. As in the case of GC the apphcation of internal standard(s) is mandatory since solvents have to be evaporated during the cleanup, which may result in partial losses of some of the more volatile analytes. [Pg.100]

Similarly, the m/z = 60 ion current signal was converted into the partial current for methanol oxidation to formic acid in a four-electron reaction (dash-dotted line in Fig. 13.3c for calibration, see Section 13.2). The resulting partial current of methanol oxidation to formic acid does not exceed about 10% of the methanol oxidation current. Obviously, the sum of both partial currents of methanol oxidation to CO2 and formic acid also does not reach the measured faradaic current. Their difference is plotted in Fig. 13.3c as a dotted line, after the PtO formation/reduction currents and pseudoca-pacitive contributions, as evident in the base CV of a Pt/Vulcan electrode (dotted line in Fig. 13.1a), were subtracted as well. Apparently, a signihcant fraction of the faradaic current is used for the formation of another methanol oxidation product, other than CO2 and formic acid. Since formaldehyde formation has been shown in methanol oxidation at ambient temperatures as well, parallel to CO2 and formic acid formation [Ota et al., 1984 Iwasita and Vielstich, 1986 Korzeniewski and ChUders, 1998 ChUders et al., 1999], we attribute this current difference to the partial current of methanol oxidation to formaldehyde. (Note that direct detection of formaldehyde by DBMS is not possible under these conditions, owing to its low volatility and interference with methanol-related mass peaks, as discussed previously [Jusys et al., 2003]). Assuming that formaldehyde is the only other methanol oxidation product in addition to CO2 and formic acid, we can quantitatively determine the partial currents of all three major products during methanol oxidation, which are otherwise not accessible. Similarly, subtraction of the partial current for formaldehyde oxidation to CO2 from the measured faradaic current for formaldehyde oxidation yields an additional current, which corresponds to the partial oxidation of formaldehyde to formic acid. The characteristics of the different Ci oxidation reactions are presented in more detail in the following sections. [Pg.428]


See other pages where Interference partial is mentioned: [Pg.2313]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.701]    [Pg.904]    [Pg.656]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.1011]    [Pg.1018]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.661]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.1510]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.194]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.139 ]




SEARCH



Partial interference functions

© 2024 chempedia.info