Interfacial hydrostatics

The interfacial area in the contactor, which is directly related to the solids hold-up, strongly influences the mass transfer rate. To maximise the overall mass-transfer rate per unit volume of equipment, a high solids hold-up is necessary. On the other hand, the solids hold-up also influences the pressure drop over the contactor. The pressure drop has a hydrostatic and a dynamic component, both of which rise with increased solids hold-up. Since the adsorbent consists of extremely small particles, fluid friction between liquid and solids may lead to a relatively high dynamic pressure drop. The hydrostatic pressure drop is attributable to the density difference between the suspension in the contact zone and in the liquid. 

The profiles of pendant and sessile bubbles and drops are commonly used in determinations of surface and interfacial tensions and of contact angles. Such methods are possible because the interfaces of static fluid particles must be at equilibrium with respect to hydrostatic pressure gradients and increments in normal stress due to surface tension at a curved interface (see Chapter 1). It is simple to show that at any point on the surface... 

Of course, both of the two coefficients, C and Klo are some combination of the processes considered when equation (8.87) through (8.102) were developed, and are a function of liquid film coefficient across both the bubbles and the free surface, bubble and water surface interfacial area, hydrostatic pressure, the mole ratio of gas in the bubbles, and equilibrium with the atmosphere. These two coefficients, however, can be valuable in the design of an aeration system, as long as (1) the arrangement of diffusers in the water body or tank is similar to the application and (2) the depth of the test is the same as the application. Significant deviations from these two criteria will cause errors in the application of the tests to the field. 

Even this simple hydrostatic formula clarifies the nature of the surface tension. The concentration variation within the interfacial region leads to a nonuniform stress tensor. The neglect of this nonuniformity gives rise to the conventional description of bulk phases. The iterative subtractive procedure demanded by the convergent expression given by Equation 5 corrects for this oversimplification at the boundary of the phases and yields an asymptotic correction (2) to the free energy of the total system in terms of its geometrical properties. 

Adhesion of water at interfaces generally creates negative hydrostatic pressures in the rest of the fluid (Eq. 2.25 describes this P near the air-water interface, where the gravitational term can be ignored). Such negative hydrostatic pressures arising from interfacial interactions have sometimes been treated in plant physiology as positive matric pressures, a convention that we mentioned earlier (Section 2.2G). 

At 0 = 90 degrees, the internal force due to gas pressure is balanced against the hydrostatic pressure of water because the interfacial tension has no component in the direction of the solid surface. In this case, the interfacial tension is directly balanced against the buoyancy of a bubble. Such a direct balance between the interfacial tension and the buoyancy can be justified for only this special case of 0 = 90 degrees. 

The sealing capacity of a rock under hydrostatic conditions is determined by the minimum hydrocarbon-water displacement pressure of the rock, which depends on the radius of the largest connected pore throats in the rock and the oil-water and gas-water interfacial tensions, and in addition on the densities of groundwater and hydrocarbons accumulating in the adjacent reservoir rock. The maximum height of an oil or gas column that can accumulate below a seal is given by Equation 4.17 (Section 4.1.3)... 

The effects of surface tension on sessile and pendent drops or lenses are but a simple manifestation of capillary hydrostatics. The field of capillarity can be far more extensive, principally when coupled with electromagnetic forces and also for liquid interfaces in motion, or in the motion in liquid interfaces that may result from local variations in surface tension as may be caused, for example, by local variations in temperature, or by the localized introduction of surfactants (interfacial tension modifiers), or by localized space-delimited chemical reactions. Wicking flows (as in heat pipes ) and flows in porous media (as in petroleum reservoir displacement) are a few of many other examples in which interfacial forces play a predominant role. ... 

Brenner ([5], pp. 428-432, and pp. 436-438), Middleman [21] (pp. 39-42) and Edwards et al. ([13], pp. 48-52) address the basic nature of macro-scale interfacial force balances at an arbitrary curved fluid in the state of hydrostatic equilibrium (a state that serves as a standard from which non-equilibrium interfacial transport processes depart). 

Thereby, for an isotropic interfacial tensor existing in a state of hydrostatic equilibrium (A.27) yields. 

Now, in order to set criteria for the requirements of spreading of a liquid on another subphase liquid, we need to formulate the vectorial equilibrium of the lens of liquid (1) on the surface of a sub-phase liquid (2), from Figure 5.5. In equilibrium, (1) and (2) must be mutually saturated in each other, and hence the surface and interfacial tensions will not necessarily be those of pure liquids. By applying the vectorial summation rule, we can write at hydrostatic equilibrium... 

It has been shown that the tendency for interfacial curvature can be reduced dramatically by a decreased fatty acid fraction in the lecithin/fatty acid mixtures rather than by an increase in pressure [93]. The marked differences between the effects of pressure and monolayer composition on the phase behavior of lecithin/fatty acid mixtures reflect the fact that compositional variations cause large changes in the lateral pressure between amphiphiles, whereas hydrostatic pressure does not. Hence, pressure provides an extremely fine resolution parameter for probing the stability and geometry of lyotropic lipid mesophases. 

The normal component of the interfacial force balance requires that Pgas must be balanced by the sum of j uquid, normal viscous stress, and surface tension effects. Under hydrostatic conditions where r = 0, Laplace s equation for surface phenomena yields... 

The inadequacy of referencing a bulk rupture parameter, / Yade, to an interfacial deformation is obvious the structure, chemistry, quasi-hydrostatic stresses, temperatures and rates of strain are certainly not comparable in the two cases. A well quoted example of the quality of the Ratner-Lancaster relationship is shown in Figure... 

One of the main design variables for bubble columns is the superficial velocity of the gas, which affects the gas holdup, the interfacial area, and the mass transfer coefficient. The superficial velocity changes as gas passes up the column because of the decrease in hydrostatic head and changes in the total molar flow. When these changes are small, an average of the inlet and exit velocities can be used to predict the performance, though in some... 

---