Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interface polar-nonpolar

Of probably greater importance is the effect of local concentration gradients. For example, analysis for a given constituent in the entire meat mass does not reflect the real concentration at a given point. For example, DNA is localized in the nuclei and lipid is localized predominantly in the adipose cells. Another factor of potential influence in reaction schemes for nitrite is the fact that polar-nonpolar interfaces are present as a result of structural compartmentalization. In an adipose cell, the lipid is contained as the body of the cell, but it is surrounded by a thin layer of sarcoplasmic protein. Therefore, large surface areas are involved. [Pg.291]

Figure 1.8 Micellar structure of a soap molecule on an oil-water interface. The nonpolar alkyl chains are in the nonpolar phase the polar carhoxylate head groups are in the aqueous phase. Figure 1.8 Micellar structure of a soap molecule on an oil-water interface. The nonpolar alkyl chains are in the nonpolar phase the polar carhoxylate head groups are in the aqueous phase.
Enhancement of the aqueous solubility by surfactants occurs as a result of the dual nature of the surfactant molecule. The term surfactant is derived from the concept of a surface-active agent. Surfactants typically contain discrete hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions, which allow them to orient at polar-nonpolar interfaces, such as water/air interfaces. Once the interface is saturated, th surfactants self-associate to form micelles and other aggregates, whereby their hydrophobic region are minimized and shielded from aqueous contact by their hydrophilic regions. This creates a discrete hydrophobic environment suitable forsolubilization of many hydrophobic compounds (Attwood and Florence, 1983 Li et al., 1999 Zhao et al., 1999). [Pg.256]

Each tetramer comprises four closely associated monomeric channels circled by a hydrophobic surface long enough to span the lipid bilayer (Fig. 4). Toward the cytoplasmic and periplasmic surfaces are layers that include side chains of tyrosine and tryptophan that can productively interact with the polar-nonpolar interface in the lipid head-group region as in other integral membrane proteins (Koeppe and Anderson, 1996). These layers are flanked by two outer layers of charged residues, 35 A apart, that result in net positive charge on the cytoplasmic side. [Pg.307]

The degree of charge separation for amphipathic helices in apoA-II, apoC-I, apoC-Il, and apwC-III is well demonstrated by the program CONSENSUS/SNORKEL (Fig. lOA). This algorithm also defines several meaningful elements of a consensus sequence for class A2. Four Lys residues cluster at and below (on the polar side of) the polar-nonpolar interface and three Glu residues cluster in the center of the polar face. [Pg.331]

The major features defined by CONSENSUS/SNORKEL analysis of class Ai (Fig. lOB) are two Arg residues at the polar-nonpolar interface and four Leu residues in the center of the nonpolar face. From Table III, class Ai has a nonpolar face hydrophobicity comparable to that of class A2, but the mean hydrophobic moment is considerably lower, and, unlike class Ai, Arg residues are twice as prevalent as Lys residues Fig. 11 shows a COMBO analysis for the distribution of Lys versus Arg for class A2 versus class Ai. A typical example of the class Ai domain, apoA-I[165-186], is shown in Fig. 8C and D. [Pg.333]

As previously noted, apoA-I contains Pro-punctuated tandem repetitive amphipathic helical domains. In apoE, however, the major lipidbinding domain maps to a class A amphipathic helix motif (residues 202-266 see Fig. 7) with no Pro punctuations (Fig. 12A). Thus, this is by far the longest unbroken amphipathic helix among the exchangeable apolipoproteins (65 residues) and one in which the polar-nonpolar interface is in register throughout its length due to a four-amino-acid deletion compared with apoA-I. [Pg.337]

The chemical nature of a solid determines its adsorptive and wetting properties. Now, the energy of immersion mainly depends on the surface chemistry but also, to some extent, on the nature of the bulk solid. For example, the interaction between water and silica has contributions from the bulk Si02 together with contributions from the silanol groups of the interface. Polar molecules are very sensitive to the local surface chemistry, whereas nonpolar molecules are more sensitive to the bulk composition. Interactions between a bulk Hquid and a bulk solid through an interface are often described in terms of Hamaker constant [16]. Immersion calorimetry in apolar liquids was proposed to estimate the Hamaker constant [17]. The sensitivity of immersion calorimetry to the surface polarity has justified its use for characterising the surface sites. [Pg.283]

Fig. III-7. The orientation of surfactant molecules adsorbed at different interfaces a - nonpolar solid/surfactant aqueous solution b - polar solid/surfactant solution in non-polar liquid (oil phase) [4]... Fig. III-7. The orientation of surfactant molecules adsorbed at different interfaces a - nonpolar solid/surfactant aqueous solution b - polar solid/surfactant solution in non-polar liquid (oil phase) [4]...
The chemical differences arising from the differences in the primary structure are also very important because the balance of polar, nonpolar and charged amino acid side chains determines the surface activity of proteins in a particular system, i.e., the possibility and mode of their location at interfaces of different types. This amphi-pathic nature of the protein molecule allows it to bind with surfaces of different chemical nature. A very important property is the protein hydrophobicity [17]. It influences adsorption and orientation of proteins at interfaces and in many cases correlates with surface activity [2,21]. [Pg.4]

Polar/Nonpolar Character of Protein-Protein and Protein DNA Interfaces... [Pg.22]

Surface/interface Number Nonpolar " Polar Charged""... [Pg.22]

Surfactant molecules, or amphiphiles consist of molecules that combine both polar and nonpolar parts (see Fig. 6.1). Because of the hydrophobic interactions discussed in Chapter 5, these molecules tend to form monolayer films at polar-nonpolar e.g., water-oil) interfaces with the polar part of the molecule solvated in the water and the hydrocarbon part of the molecule in the oil. In this case, the properties of the film are, in general, not symmetric with respect to the interface. In a single solvent e.g., water), these molecules tend to form bilayers where the hydrocarbon parts of each monolayer are aggregated in the middle of the bilayer to reduce the contact between the water and the nonpolar parts of the molecule. When composed of a single species, the properties of such bilayer films are symmetric with respect to their two sides. Lipid molecules are surfactant-like entities that generally have a polar head... [Pg.180]

Based on the discussion in the text, calculate the bending modulus, gi, for deformations relative to the neutral surface in terms of the parameters that describe the bending at some other surface ie.g., the polar-nonpolar interface), fu //. /o". [Pg.208]

The main surface active compounds present are proteins and lipids. The requirement for surface activity is that the compound have molecules with a dual nature that is, they have a polar moiety and a nonpolar moiety. Such molecules concentrate at an interface because they can orient so that the polar moiety interacts with the polar phase (water) and the nonpolar moiety interacts with the nonpolar phase (air). An example is shown in Figure 7.9. A molecule such as a long chain fatty acid has a lower energy at the interface than in either of the adjacent phases. It will therefore become concentrated and oriented at a polar-nonpolar interface. [Pg.65]

The design of these interfaces is dictated, in large part, by the method used to ionize the molecules, which in turn is dictated by the nature of the molecules themselves, i.e. volatile, nonvolatile, polar, nonpolar, low mass, high mass etc., as well as the need to couple chromatographic techniques that operate at or near atmospheric pressure to the vacuum requirements of the MS. [Pg.238]

Regen (1977) has extended these studies to include the interaction of water with a polystyrene matrix containing pendant poly(ethylene glycol monomethyl ether) groups. This type of polymer has been used in triphase catalysis (see Chapter 13). It was demonstrated that relatively fluid polar and nonpolar zones existed within the polymer and that, upon changes in solvent composition, either a contraction of the polar-nonpolar interface occurred, or the polarity and viscosity in the polar and nonpolar zones were changed. [Pg.48]

Off-line coupling of HILIC and the reversed phase was realized by lisa and coworkers for lipidomic profiling of biological tissues [76] using both UV and MS detection (namely, ESI for polar phospholipid species and APCI interface for nonpolar TAG species). [Pg.242]


See other pages where Interface polar-nonpolar is mentioned: [Pg.22]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.1340]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.475]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.410 ]




SEARCH



Interface nonpolarized

Interface polarization

Interface polarized

Nonpolar

Nonpolar polar

Nonpolarized

Polar interface

Polarity/polarization interface

© 2024 chempedia.info