Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interface factors involved

The effective use of metals as materials of construction must be based on an understanding of their physical, mechanical and chemical properties. These last, as pointed out earlier, cannot be divorced from the environmental conditions prevailing. Any fundamental approach to the phenomena of corrosion must therefore involve consideration of the structural features of the metal, the nature of the environment and the reactions that occur at the metal/environment interface. The more important factors involved may be summarised as follows ... [Pg.7]

Following Ivanov et al. (21-23) a factor involving the parameter a is included in the drainage/filling term to account for surfactant viscous dissipation at the gas/liquid interface in the limit of high surfactant concentrations. When - 0 the... [Pg.468]

Thus of the two factors involved in the expansion increase in length of chain and increase in melting point temperature, the latter is more important than the former up to a chain length of Ci8 atoms at which the interface and film are almost condensed again. [Pg.90]

In CVD processes, due to the simultaneous presence of gaseous and solid phases, models should consider heterogeneous nucleation (defined as nucleation at an interface) rather than homogeneous nucleation (defined as nucleation in an indefinite point of a fluid matrix). Nevertheless, the complexity of the factors involved in heterogeneous nucleation leads us to first examine the more simple homogeneous nucleation. [Pg.159]

As shown in Section (7.2), the P ( the symmetry factor ) is often observed as part of the transfer coefficient, which is a more all-embracing coefficient that multiplies the potential at the interface and involves considerations of where... [Pg.812]

We can attempt to apply the same type of model to the H2S data, however there are two additional unknown factors involved. First, we do not have a measurement of the sea surface concentrations of H2S. Second, the piston velocity of H2S is enhanced by a chemical enrichment factor which, in laboratory studies, increases the transfer rate over that expected for the unionized species alone. Balls and Liss (5Q) demonstrated that at seawater pH the HS- present in solution contributes significantly to the total transport of H S across the interface. Since the degree of enrichment is not known under field conditions, we have assumed (as an upper limit) that the transfer occurs as if all of the labile sulfide (including HS ana weakly complexed sulfide) was present as H2S. In this case, the piston velocity of H2S would be the same as that of Radon for a given wind velocity, with a small correction (a factor of 1.14) for the estimated diffusivity difference. If we then specify the piston velocity and OH concentration we could calculate the concentration of H2S in the surface waters. Using the input conditions from model run B from Figure 4a (OH = 5 x 106 molecules/cm3, Vd = 3.1 m/day) yields a sea surface sulfide concentration of approximately 0.1 nM. Figure S illustrates the diurnal profile of atmospheric H2S which results from these calculations. [Pg.345]

Befus, A. D. Bienenstock, J. (1982). Factors involved in symbiosis and host resistance at the mucosa-parasite interface. Progress in Allergy, 31 76-177. [Pg.308]

The ways in which reaction parameters affect a two phase batch reaction are similar to those considered above for the three phase systems. Since there is no gas phase, agitation only serves to keep the catalyst suspended making it more accessible to the dissolved reactants so it only has a secondary effect on mass transfer processes. Substrate concentration and catalyst quantity are the two most important reaction variables in such reactions since both have an influence on the rate of migration of the reactants through the liquid/solid interface. Also of significant importance are the factors involved in minimizing pore diffusion factors the size of the catalyst particles and their pore structure. [Pg.90]

The factor 2 follows from the fact that two interfaces are involved. Taking a value of Ay = 10 mN m , the stress amounts to 40kPa (which is of the same order of magnitude as the external stress). [Pg.181]

PrPc is linked to dimer formation with the HD as part of the dimer interface [95]. Thus, failure of dimerization might be an additional factor involved in PrPAHD-induced toxicity. [Pg.110]

The experimental evaluation of adsorption from solution at sohd-liquid interfaces usually involves the measurement of changes in the concentration of the solute in the solution after adsorption has occurred. The usual method for evaluating the adsorption mechanism is through the adsorption isotherm. The important factors to be considered are (1) the nature of the interaction(s) between the adsorbate and the adsorbent, (2) the rate of adsorption, (3) the... [Pg.202]

In contrast to detection systems that are based on physicochemical properties e.g. UV-visible absorption, fluorescence) and typically involve homogeneous solutions, it is clear that ED must be a heterogeneous process since interfaces are involved. Furthermore, electrochemical detectors (EDs) are reaction detectors and therefore the responses may be influenced not only by the amount(s) of electroactive analyte(s) present, but also by factors such as temperature and residence time. [Pg.6]

In the first stage, Reaction 12.28, the surface is protonated, and the anion adsorbs in the 1 plane as outer sphere complex, losing two protons the protons cancel out but are retained here to remark the interface planes involved, which define the contributions to the electrostatic work. In Reaction 12.29, the anion binds specifically, and two water molecnles are removed from the 0 plane becanse water has a dipolar moment, there is an electrostatic work involved, which is not considered in the original TLM. The electrostatic factor involved in Reaction 12.28 results from H2ASOJ adsorbing at the 1 plane, two protons adsorbing at the 0 plane, and two other protons desorbing from the 1 plane ... [Pg.424]

Fig. U Schematic of a bipolar lead illustrating the factors involved in determining system impedance. The arrows denote current flow. Resistance to current flow occurs at the lead conductor (conductor resistance), at the cathode-tissue interface (cathode impedance and polarization), in the myocardium (tissue impedance) and at the anode (anode impedance). The largest contributors to system impedance are the cathode impedance and polarization effects. Fig. U Schematic of a bipolar lead illustrating the factors involved in determining system impedance. The arrows denote current flow. Resistance to current flow occurs at the lead conductor (conductor resistance), at the cathode-tissue interface (cathode impedance and polarization), in the myocardium (tissue impedance) and at the anode (anode impedance). The largest contributors to system impedance are the cathode impedance and polarization effects.
Human Factors Human-machine interface and the psychological, social, physical, biological, and safety factors involved in a system that interfeces with a human body. [Pg.338]

Notice that while F is a complex number, only the absolute square, F, appears in eq. (9). This gives rise to the well-known phase problem of X-ray crystallography. The exponential in eq. (9), the Debye-Waller factor, involves the terms hor and u, which are the mean-square atomic displacements in the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively. The factor 7 (ap) describes interference of X-rays diffracted upwards with X-rays diffracted down and subsequently reflected back up by the interface. The factor ITCap) equals unity except near ap= ttc where it peaks sharply (the Yoneda-Vineyard peak) [65, 66]. It is convenient for deducing the zero-point of the f scale, which often covers a range of 0 to 10 , but otherwise... [Pg.213]

Two main interfaces are involved when droplets of an agrochemical formulation are produced from a spray nozzle (i) spray solution/air interface (ii) droplet/leaf surface interface. The main factors that must be considered are solution/air surface tension and solid/liquid interfacial tension (that is determined by the contact angle of the Uq-... [Pg.268]

The formation of structured thin films (both phase morphology and surface topography) is typically the result of the phase-separation processes, which are, in turn, strongly influenced by the presence of an interface. Therefore, these processes may lead to surface-oriented phase separation [27] among others, or the formation of a wetting layer [61], or, in the case of a partial wetting, the presence of a surface field that can induce the breakup of a surface layer [62,63], In this section, we will detail the main factors involved in the phase-separation phenomena. [Pg.316]


See other pages where Interface factors involved is mentioned: [Pg.437]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.592]    [Pg.2693]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.598]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.153]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.511 ]




SEARCH



Factors Involved in an Interface

Factors involved

© 2024 chempedia.info