Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Intercorrelation

Intercorrelation coefficients are then computed. These tell when one descriptor is redundant with another. Using redundant descriptors increases the amount of fitting work to be done, does not improve the results, and results in unstable fitting calculations that can fail completely (due to dividing by zero or some other mathematical error). Usually, the descriptor with the lowest correlation coefficient is discarded from a pair of redundant descriptors. [Pg.244]

Another problem which can appear in the search for the minimum is intercorrelation of some model parameters. For example, such a correlation usually exists between the frequency factor (pre-exponential factor) and the activation energy (argument in the exponent) in the Arrhenius equation or between rate constant (appears in the numerator) and adsorption equilibrium constants (appear in the denominator) in Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic expressions. [Pg.545]

The models characterized by small intercorrelation coefficients are preferred to the models of large intercorrelation coefficients arbitrarily it can be assumed that intercorrelation coefficients of an absolute value over 0.8 should not be accepted. [Pg.550]

Statishcal criteria of Eq. (24) are too good the standard deviation, which was created on the basis of different measurements by various authors, is much less than even the experimental error of determinahon. This could be due to mutual intercorrelation of descriptors leading to over-ophmistic statistics [18]. Another reason may be the lack of diversity in the training set. The applicahon of the solvation equation to data extracted from the MEDchem97 database gave much more modest results n = 8844, = 0.83, root mean square error = 0.674, F = 8416... [Pg.144]

A table of correlations between the variables from the instrumental set and variables from the sensory set may reveal some strong one-to-one relations. However, with a battery of sensory attributes on the one hand and a set of instrumental variables on the other hand it is better to adopt a multivariate approach, i.e. to look at many variables at the same time taking their intercorrelations into account. An intermediate approach is to develop separate multiple regression models for each sensory attribute as a linear function of the physical/chemical predictor variables. [Pg.438]

Beilken et al. [ 12] have applied a number of instrumental measuring methods to assess the mechanical strength of 12 different meat patties. In all, 20 different physical/chemical properties were measured. The products were tasted twice by 12 panellists divided over 4 sessions in which 6 products were evaluated for 9 textural attributes (rubberiness, chewiness, juiciness, etc.). Beilken etal. [12] subjected the two sets of data, viz. the instrumental data and the sensory data, to separate principal component analyses. The relation between the two data sets, mechanical measurements versus sensory attributes, was studied by their intercorrelations. Although useful information can be derived from such bivariate indicators, a truly multivariate regression analysis may give a simpler overall picture of the relation. [Pg.438]

There is also intercorrelation between the volatile matter and the H/C atomic ratio for the South African coals studied. [Pg.47]

Because of the way the data was created, we can rely on the calibration statistics as an indicator of performance. There is no need to use a validation set of data here. Validation sets are required mainly to assess the effects of noise and intercorrelation. Our simulated data contains no noise. Furthermore, since we are using only one wavelength or one factor, intercorrelation effects are not operative, and can be ignored. Therefore the final test lies in the values obtained from the sets of calibration results, which are presented in Table 27-1. [Pg.133]

In mammals, cadmium inhibits copper absorption across the intestinal mucosa (Aaseth and Norseth 1986). Intercorrelations of copper with cadmium and zinc in livers of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) are probably mediated by metallothioneins, which may contain all three metals (Braune etal. 1991). In rats, copper protects against nephrotoxicity induced by cadmium, provided that copper is administered 24 h prior to cadmium insult. Specifically, rats given 12.5 mg Cu/kg BW by way of subcutaneous injection 24 h before receiving 0.4 mg Cd/kg BW — when compared to a group receiving Cd alone — did not have excessive calcium in urine and renal cortex or excessive protein in urine. Thus, 2.8 mg Cu/kg BW protects against 0.25 mg Cd/kg BW (Liu et al. 1992). [Pg.137]

In sum, this is how ideal indicators of taxa behave—they intercorrelate in samples where taxon members and nonmembers are mixed, and they do not correlate in pure samples of taxon members or in pure samples of nontaxon members. This behavior of taxon markers is captured by a reduced General Covariance Mixture Theorem (GCMT for the derivation of the theorem... [Pg.33]

We have presumed a taxon and some indicators. Next, we take one of these indicators and assign scores to a group of individuals on each indicator (e.g., everyone gets a score from 1 to 7 on sadness, anhedonia, and suicidality), much as one does with the Beck Depression Inventory and similar self-report scales. Finally, we examine the pairwise intercorrelations of the indicators at all possible values of all other indicators. In the depression example, we would examine the correlation of sadness and anhedonia for those who score 1 on suicidality, those who score 2 on suicidality, and so forth, up the scale to those who score 7 on suicidality. Similarly, we would examine the correlation of sadness and suicidality for those who score 1 on anhedonia, those who score 2 on anhedonia, and so forth. This would be continued for all possible combinations of indicators. [Pg.34]

In addition, the authors generated a continuous simulated data set. All data points were drawn from the same distribution that matched the transformed data set on distributional characteristics, indicator means, skew, kur-tosis, and intercorrelations. MAMBAC analysis of this simulated data produced mostly nontaxonic plots some had a right-end increase, but none were rated as unambiguously taxonic. [Pg.144]

To facilitate interpretation of the outputs, the authors also created two simulation data sets with identical distributional properties (number of indicators, number of levels, indicator intercorrelations, skew and kurtosis) one taxonic set and one dimensional set. The taxonic data set was created to have a base rate of. 23, which corresponds to the proportion of cases falling at or above a BDI threshold of 10 in the undergraduate data set. Ruscio and Ruscio tried to ensure that indicator validities and nuisance correlations matched the estimated parameters of the real indicators, but they did not indicate how successful this was. [Pg.154]

Since Eqs. 48 and 49 were found to be identical within the standard errors on coefficients, it indicated that the coefficients in Eq. 48 were not greatly affected by the intercorrelation of descriptors. On this basis they conclude that Eq. 48 is as good as, or better than, the models based on subsets of the data used in the study. [Pg.528]

Fig. 42 EA 3580 Intercorrelations among 12 performance tasks after intramuscular ID50 (shown by squares of varying density) increase and decrease as drug effects wax and wane. Fig. 42 EA 3580 Intercorrelations among 12 performance tasks after intramuscular ID50 (shown by squares of varying density) increase and decrease as drug effects wax and wane.
To demonstrate this statistically, Phil Kysor and I compiled the intercorrelations among the 12 tasks at various experimental times (Fig. 42). Statistically, the matrices shown above simply demonstrate that the variance in scores are progressively accounted for by intensity of dmg effects. Thus, one can predict individual impairment in all skill areas by the degree to which drug action affects performance in any single task. This applies, incidentally, to individuals who may be quite dissimilar in various abilities prior to the administration of a belladonnoid drug such as EA 3580. [Pg.306]

This procedure assessed whether some of the different descriptors used by different equations were intercorrelated and, therefore, interchangeable [59]. The remaining diverse QSAR equations were further classified by size (number of descriptors they include). The best equations of each encountered size were kept for final validation with the VS molecules and for further analysis. Consensus models featuring average predictions over these equations were also generated and validated. We focus here on the discussion of the minimalist overlay-independent and overlay-based QSAR models, each including only six descriptors, and refer to the optimal consensus model of the overlay-based QSAR approach families for comparative purposes. [Pg.125]

In real applications, where there is noise in the data, it is rare to have two x variables exactly correlated to one another. However, a high degree of correlation between any two x variables leads to an unstable matrix inversion, which resnlts in a large amonnt of noise being introduced to the regression coefficients. Therefore, one mnst be very wary of intercorrelation between x variables when nsing the MLR method. [Pg.362]

Although the MCR method can be a very effective exploratory method, several warnings are appropriate. One must be careful interpreting MCR-determined K and C as absolute pure component spectra and pure component time profiles, respectively, due to the possible presence of intercorrelations between chemical components and spectral features, as well as nonlinear spectral interaction effects. Furthermore, the optimal number of components to be determined (A) must be specified by the user, and is usually not readily apparent a priori. In practice, A is determined by trial and error, and any attempts to overfit an MCR model will often result in K or C profiles that either contain anomalous artifacts, or are not physically meaningful. The application of inaccurate or inappropriate constraints can also lead to misleading or anomalous results with limited or no information content. [Pg.403]

Hydrogen bonding is now seen as an important property related to membrane permeation. Various scales have been developed [23]. Some of these scales describe total hydrogen bonding capability of a compound, while others discriminate between donors and acceptors [24]. It has been demonstrated that most of these scales show considerable intercorrelation [25]. [Pg.8]

The results of the studies will be summarized. Details of the QSAR analyses are or will be published elsewhere, including intercorrelation matrices of the steric parameters mentioned. But relevant conclusions from e.g. intercorrelations will be dicussed. At this moment the STERIMOL method has been applied successfully in about 50 publications often with better results than other steric approaches, including MTD and MTD, especially in series with few substituent positions. A recent example is our study of DDT analogs. Brown et al. (9J analysed a series of 21 derivatives using the van de Waals (Vw) volumes as steric parameters. In Table I the equations are given in which the steric parameters are compared. [Pg.284]

The MTD values used in Equation 24 turned to be highly correlated with the u values (r=0.924), so that combination of the parameters gave no significant improvement in Eq. 25. The intercorrelation... [Pg.290]

These results give some insight in the scope and limitations of the MTD, MTD and STERIMOL parameters. Let us first compare the MTD and MTD methods. In the example of the benzyl chrysanthemates the regression equations have only steric terms, sothat there is no difference between the two methods in principle. In the case of the benzoylphenyl ureas the intercorrelation between the MTD values and the other parameters is very low, so it is understandable that there is hardly any difference. But in the four other studies there was much more intercorrelation between the MTD values on the one hand and the electronic and/or hydrophobic parameters on the other hand, and in these cases the MTD method gives slightly better results. Our preliminary conclusion from the examples discussed, is that the MTD is the preferable one, both from fundamental and... [Pg.294]

Buffered acetolysis of tosylate 420 gives diene 421 as the major product along with unrearranged acetate. In buffered formolysis, the cis formate 422 evolves as the principal component. The structural assignments were confirmed by the chemical intercorrelations shown... [Pg.20]


See other pages where Intercorrelation is mentioned: [Pg.490]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.18]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.43 ]




SEARCH



Intercorrelations

© 2024 chempedia.info