Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fitness calculation

This also illustrates the use of different wavelengths of light to obtain much more infomration on the nature of the film. Here A and T are plotted versus the wavelength of light ( ) and the line drawn tln-ough these data represents a fit calculated for the various fihns of yttrium oxide deposited on silica as shown at tire bottom of the figure [40],... [Pg.1888]

To anyone who has carried out curve-fitting calculations with a mechanical calculator (yes, they once existed) TableCurve (Appendix A) is equally miraculous. TableCurve fits dozens, hundreds, or thousands of equations to a set of experimental data points and ranks them according to how well they fit the points, enabling the researcher to select from among them. Many will fit poorly, but usually several fit well. [Pg.27]

Intercorrelation coefficients are then computed. These tell when one descriptor is redundant with another. Using redundant descriptors increases the amount of fitting work to be done, does not improve the results, and results in unstable fitting calculations that can fail completely (due to dividing by zero or some other mathematical error). Usually, the descriptor with the lowest correlation coefficient is discarded from a pair of redundant descriptors. [Pg.244]

As seen in Table 11.7, the 0, value for the errant response value obtained for 1 pM agonist (93% versus a calculated value of 77.9%) leads to a value for 0jv of 4.97. Since this value is greater than the default for B, the weighting for this point is zero and the point is removed. Figure 8.9 shows the weighted fit (calculated in Table 11.7) for the same data. [Pg.237]

It is important to note that comparison of results from these charts does not yield exact checks on any particular fitting. Calculations should never be represented as being more accurate than the basic information. Therefore,... [Pg.90]

Three parameters thus need to be estimated, namely the scalar factor a, the compression factor c, and the shift d. Parameter b was dropped for two reasons (1) the effect of this exponent is to be explored, so it must remain fixed during a parameter-fitting calculation, and (2) the parameter estimation decreases in efficiency for every additional parameter. Therefore the model takes on the form... [Pg.209]

A possible, but unsatisfactory, relationship between string energy and string fitness, calculated using equation (5.3). [Pg.124]

The energy of each of the ten strings in the initial population is shown in Table 5.1, together with the fitness calculated from equation (5.4). [Pg.124]

A possible relationship between string energy and fitness, calculated from equation (5.4). [Pg.125]

For each valve and fitting, calculate K from NReh and Dt, using the 3-K method. [Pg.216]

Figure L Absorption spectrum of K[MnOJ/K[CIOJ mixed crystal at room temperature (a), and experimental (O) and best-fit calculated (—) excitation profile of the vt (at) band of [MnOJ" in K[MnOj/K[ClOJ mixed crystal for T/hc = 300 cm1 and 8 = 0.092 A (b). Figure L Absorption spectrum of K[MnOJ/K[CIOJ mixed crystal at room temperature (a), and experimental (O) and best-fit calculated (—) excitation profile of the vt (at) band of [MnOJ" in K[MnOj/K[ClOJ mixed crystal for T/hc = 300 cm1 and 8 = 0.092 A (b).
After performing a least-squares best fit calculation of the data points, the plot of In kvs. 1/r for the decomposition in nitrogen yields an activation energy of 74.4 kca/mol (r = 0.991). [Pg.342]

P and Q are coefficients found by best fit calculation. This has the advantage that it has no discontinuities and so a smooth temperature transition is assured. [Pg.107]

Fig. 3.14 Experimental Oeft) and best fit calculated H nmr line shapes of UOjlacacljMe SO in o-C H Clj. Temperature and best fit x values are shown at left and right sides of the figure. Reproduced with permission from Y. Ikeda, H. Tomiyasu and H. Fukutorai, Inorg. Chem. 23, 1356 (1984). (1984) American Chemical Society. Fig. 3.14 Experimental Oeft) and best fit calculated H nmr line shapes of UOjlacacljMe SO in o-C H Clj. Temperature and best fit x values are shown at left and right sides of the figure. Reproduced with permission from Y. Ikeda, H. Tomiyasu and H. Fukutorai, Inorg. Chem. 23, 1356 (1984). (1984) American Chemical Society.
Matrix of mean replicate responses and sum of squares due to lack of fit. Calculate the J matrix for Problem 9.6. Calculate the corresponding L matrix and... [Pg.171]

Figure 7. A, Atmospheric emission spectrum of region near that used by Traub et al. (85) to quantify stratospheric H02 concentrations. B, A laboratory H02 spectrum. C, The best-fit calculated spectrum. (Reproduced with permission from reference 85. Copyright 1990 American Association for the Advancement... Figure 7. A, Atmospheric emission spectrum of region near that used by Traub et al. (85) to quantify stratospheric H02 concentrations. B, A laboratory H02 spectrum. C, The best-fit calculated spectrum. (Reproduced with permission from reference 85. Copyright 1990 American Association for the Advancement...
Equation 4.51 is an integral equation that can be used to determine D(c ) by a graphical construction or numerical solution. The derivative required in Eq. 4.51 is provided by the measured concentration profile at time t and the integration is performed on the inverse of c x) [6]. However, this historically important method is only moderately accurate, and it would be preferable to obtain diffusion profiles for various assumed diffusivities as a function of concentration by computation. D(c) could be deduced by fitting calculated results for a parametric representation of D(c) to an experimentally determined diffusion profile. [Pg.87]

Figure 16. The 2S interaction potential of He(23S)-H (-), result of fit calculations 51 (-o-), result of ab initio calculations.19... Figure 16. The 2S interaction potential of He(23S)-H (-), result of fit calculations 51 (-o-), result of ab initio calculations.19...
The calculated cross-section curves are compared with experimental data in Fig. 18. The fact that the total cross-section curves pass through the experimental point for an average collision energy of 45 meV was required in the fit calculations. As seen in Fig. 9, the value obtained by Howard et al.54 for an average collision energy of 370 meV also lies on the calculated curve. However, for a given absolute calibration of T(/i), as the energy... [Pg.441]

Stothart and Cebula (1982) and Stothart (1989) obtained linear Guinier plots of sub-micelles of whole casein, giving a radius of gyration of 64 A (Figure 1). On a uniform sphere model, this would indicate sphere radius of 84 A. This sphere size was input to a model fitting calculation (below). Thum et al (1987) found similar sizes for sub-micelles of kappa-casein. [Pg.208]

The construction of exchange correlation potentials and energies becomes a task for which not much guidance can be obtained from fundamental theory. The form of dependence on the electron density is generally not known and can only to a limited extent be obtained from theoretical considerations. The best one can do is to assume some functional dependence on the density with parameters to satisfy some consistency criteria and to fit calculated results to some model systems for which applications of proper quantum mechanical theory can be used as comparisons. At best this results in some form of ad-hoc semi-empirical method, which may be used with success for simulations of molecular ground state properties, but is certainly not universal. [Pg.40]

In Tables XVII-XIX we present the fitted/calculated parameters of our model for ions plasma frequency 0), static ionic conductivity a, fitted parameters... [Pg.282]

Figure 3. Experimental values and fits calculated by Equation (23) (assuming 7 = 0.059) for 70bs as a function of the droplet transit time for two values of H s(iv) Lower curve -- H SjqV) = 23 upper curve -- H Snv) = 4200. These values were obtained by setting the pH of the droplets surface at 3.0 and 5.2, respectively. Figure 3. Experimental values and fits calculated by Equation (23) (assuming 7 = 0.059) for 70bs as a function of the droplet transit time for two values of H s(iv) Lower curve -- H SjqV) = 23 upper curve -- H Snv) = 4200. These values were obtained by setting the pH of the droplets surface at 3.0 and 5.2, respectively.
Figure 6.11 XRD-RSMs with y offset measured for (a) sbtn and (b) fluorite-SBTN thin films and fitted calculated diffraction patterns for the obtained results, (c) and (d). Figure 6.11 XRD-RSMs with y offset measured for (a) sbtn and (b) fluorite-SBTN thin films and fitted calculated diffraction patterns for the obtained results, (c) and (d).

See other pages where Fitness calculation is mentioned: [Pg.122]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.713]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.967]    [Pg.9]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.483 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info