Interactions between symmetry operations

We now consider how the two interacting symmetry operations produce a third symmetry operation, similar to how it was described in section 1.6 but now in terms of their algebraic representation. Assume that two symmetry operations, which are given by the two augmented matrices A and A, are applied in sequence to a point, coordinates of which are represented by the augmented vector V. Taking into account Eq. 1.48, but written in a short form, the first symmetry operation will result in the vector V given as 

The second symmetry operation applied to the vector V will result in the third vector, as follows 

Recalling, that the associative law holds for symmetry operations and for symmetry groups (see sections 1.6 and 1.7), equation 1.50 can be rewritten as 

The presence of the center of inversion introduces one additional symmetry operation, 

It is easy to see that the product of A and A is the fourth s)nnmetry operation, A , which is nothing else but the mirror reflection in the plane, which is perpendicular to Y and passes through the origin of coordinates  

---

It follows from Eq. 1.51 and from our earlier consideration of interactions between symmetry elements, finding which symmetry operation appears as the result of consecutive application of any two symmetry operations is reduced to calculating the product of the corresponding augmented matrices. To illustrate how it is done in practice, consider Figure 1.16 and assume that the two-fold axis is parallel to Y. The corresponding symmetry operations. A and A, are Table 1.19) ... 

Obviously, the model is crude and does not take into account many of the factors operating in a real molecular stack. Lack of symmetry with respect to the polar axis and the fact that dipoles may not necessarily be situated in one plane represent additional complications. The angle a could also be field dependent which is ignored in the model. The model also requires that interactions between molecules in adjacent stacks be very weak in order for fields of 10 to 20KV/cm to overcome barriers for field induced reorientation. The cores are then presumably composed of a more or less ordered assembly of stacks with a structure similar to smectic liquid crystals. 

In essence, jSel is the interaction between the electronic wave functions of A and B. Obviously there must be some spatial overlap between the two in order to give rise to a finite value. Furthermore, if 0A. and />B fall in the same symmetry class or, in complex molecules, have similar local symmetry, the value of j8 may be relatively large. This will depend upon whether or not the perturbation operators, H, have preferred symmetry properties. The Woodward-Hoffman rules suggest that these operators can... 

Pair transfer interaction between the states of an electron system components can cause the gauge symmetry breaking realized in superconductivity. This circumstance forms the basis of the two-band model of superconductivity known already during a considerable time [1,2], The basic advantage of such approaches consists in the possibility to reach pairing by a repulsive interband interaction which operates in a considerable volume of the momentum space. An electronic energy scale is... 

The frozen-core (fc) approach is not restricted to spin-independent electronic interactions the spin-orbit (SO) interaction between core and valence electrons can be expressed by a sum of Coulomb- and exchange-type operators. The matrix element formulas can be derived in a similar way as the Sla-ter-Condon rules.27 Here, it is not important whether the Breit-Pauli spin-orbit operators or their no-pair analogs are employed as these are structurally equivalent. Differences with respect to the Slater-Condon rules occur due to the symmetry properties of the angular momentum operators and because of the presence of the spin-other-orbit interaction. It is easily shown by partial integration that the linear momentum operator p is antisymmetric with respect to orbital exchange, and the same applies to t = r x p. Therefore, spin-orbit... 

In this expression, Hg represents a purely electronic interaction between an undistorted system and the surface, and are electronic operators determining the interaction between a vibration (irrep F, component y) and the surface. Uiese latter operators must therefore have transformation properties dictated by the symmetry of both the adsorbed molecule and the surface. The form of (2) is suggestive of the standard method by which JT theory is developed, and this may be a desirable approach for future work. As a first approximation, however, we ignore the additional complication of surface-induced distortion and concentrate on the zeroth order term . 

As established above, the interaction between a pair of symmetry elements (or symmetry operations) results in another symmetry element (or symmetry operation). The former may be new or already present within a given combination of symmetrically equivalent objects. If no new symmetry element(s) appear, and when interactions between all pairs of the existing ones are examined, the generation of all symmetry elements is completed. The complete set of symmetry elements is called a symmetry group. 

---