Perturbation Operators

A Moeller-Plesset Cl correction to v / is based on perturbation theory, by which the Hamiltonian is expressed as a Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian perturbed by a small perturbation operator P through a minimization constant X... 

Here, Ri f and Rf i are the rates (per moleeule) of transitions for the i ==> f and f ==> i transitions respeetively. As noted above, these rates are proportional to the intensity of the light souree (i.e., the photon intensity) at the resonant frequeney and to the square of a matrix element eonneeting the respeetive states. This matrix element square is oti fp in the former ease and otf ip in the latter. Beeause the perturbation operator whose matrix elements are ai f and af i is Hermitian (this is true through all orders of perturbation theory and for all terms in the long-wavelength expansion), these two quantities are eomplex eonjugates of one another, and, henee ai fp = af ip, from whieh it follows that Ri f = Rf i. This means that the state-to-state absorption and stimulated emission rate eoeffieients (i.e., the rate per moleeule undergoing the transition) are identieal. This result is referred to as the prineiple of microscopic reversibility. 

The first-order energy involves only the perturbation operator and the unperturbed wavefunction. In an HF-LCAO treatment, the integrals would be over the LCAOs, and this implies a four-index transformation to integrals over the basis functions. 

The formulas for higher-order conections become increasingly complex. The main point, however, is that all corrections can be expressed in terms of matrix elements of the perturbation operator over the unperturbed wave functions, and the unperturbed energies. 

The zero-order wave function is the HF determinant, and the zero-order energy is just a sum of MO energies. The first-order energy correction is the average of the perturbation operator over the zero-order wave function (eq. (4.36)). 

Let us look at the expression for the second-order energy correction, eq. (4.38). This involves matrix elements of the perturbation operator between the HF reference and all possible excited states. Since the perturbation is a two-electron operator, all matrix elements involving triple, quadruple etc. excitations are zero. When canonical HF... 

The main limitation of perturbation methods is the assumption that the zero-order wave function is a reasonable approximation to the real wave function, i.e. the perturbation operator is sufficiently small . The poorer the HF wave function describes... 

All of the terms in eqs. (8.29-8.34) may be used as perturbation operators in connection with non-relativistic theory, as discussed in more detail in Chapter 10. It should be noted, however, that some of the operators are inherently divergent, and should not be used beyond a first-order perturbation correction. 

If the perturbation is a homogeneous electric field F, the perturbation operator P i (eq. (10.17)) is the position vector r and P2 is zero. As.suming that the basis functions are independent of the electric field (as is normally the case), the first-order HF property, the dipole moment, from the derivative formula (10.21) is given as (since an HF wave function obeys the Hellmann-Feynman theorem)... 

Choosing a non-zero value for uj corresponds to a time-dependent field with a frequency u, i.e. the ((r r)) propagator determines the frequency-dependent polarizability corresponding to an electric field described by the perturbation operator QW = r cos (cut). Propagator methods are therefore well suited for calculating dynamical properties, and by suitable choices for the P and Q operators, a whole variety of properties may be calculated. " ... 

We assume that the perturbation operator V(t, e) can be expanded in a sum over Fourier components as... 

In order to construct a monotone scheme for problem (78) for which the maximum principle would be valid for any li and r, we involve in subsequent considerations the equation of the same type, but with the perturbed operator Z ... 

In order to define the notation which we will use from now on, let us consider the application of the perturbation theory to a system which has a perturbed hamiltonian H composed by an unperturbed one, H", plus a perturbation operator A.V, where A, () ... 

Let us write a perturbed hamiltonian by a set of k independent perturbation operators using the following expression involving a NSS ... 

To summarize, the RPPA is a method that can accurately describe relativistic effects, even though the relativistic perturbation operator used in the pseudopotential procedure is acting on the valence space and not the region dose to the nudeus, as this is the case for the correct all-electron relativistic perturbation operator. That is, relativistic effects are completely transferred into the valence space. These effects are also completely transferable from the atomic to the molecular case as the results for Au2 show. If relativistic pseudopotentials are carefully adjusted, they can produce results with errors much smaller than the errors originating from basis set incompleteness, basis set superposition or from the electron correlation procedure applied. 

The perturbation operators must be modified in accordance with the new definition of the zeroth-order electron states ... 

Effect of off-diagonal dynamic disorder (off-DDD). The interaction of the electron with the fluctuations of the polarization and local vibrations near the other center leads to new terms VeP - V P, Vev - Vev and VeAp - VAPd, VA - VAd in the perturbation operators V°d and Vfd [see Eqs. (14)]. A part of these interactions corresponding to the equilibrium values of the polarization P0l and Po/ results in the renormalization of the electron interactions with ions A and B, due to their partial screening by the dielectric medium. However, at arbitrary values of the polarization P, there is another part of these interactions which is due to the fluctuating electric fields. This part of the interaction depends on the nuclear coordinates and may exceed the renormalized interactions of the electron with the donor and the acceptor. The interaction of the electron with these fluctuations plays an important role in processes involving solvated, trapped, and weakly bound electrons. 

We find the linear response of a subsystem in contact with a reservoir to an external perturbation involving some variable B of the subsystem and depending on the time through a function F(t), so that the corresponding perturbation operator can be written in the form... 

The applied perturbation is treated quantum-mechanically, relating power dissipation to certain matrix elements of the perturbation operator. It shows that for small perturbations, a system with densely distributed energy levels is dissipative and linear. 

For our purposes, the most general way to perform systematic correction of a specified model /7(0) is by means of perturbation theory, as first developed for such problems by Schrodinger himself.5 The difference between the true H and the model N(<)) is defined as the perturbation operator /7(perl ... 

The first PC provides a set of d-dimensional loadings, which can be transformed by (2) into a compositional data array, L, and a PC score, S, for each y. The first PC expressed as compositional data is calculated by the perturbation operation... 

The reference (zeroth-order) function in the CASPT2 method is a predetermined CASSCF wave function. The coefficients in the CAS function are thus fixed and are not affected by the perturbation operator. This choice of the reference function often works well when the other solutions to the CAS Hamiltonian are well separated in energy, but there may be a problem when two or more electronic states of the same symmetry are close in energy. Such situations are common for excited states. One can then expect the dynamic correlation to also affect the reference function. This problem can be handled by extending the perturbation treatment to include electronic states that are close in energy. This extension, called the Multi-State CASPT2 method, has been implemented by Finley and coworkers.24 We will briefly summarize the main aspects of the Multi-State CASPT2 method. 

---