Inter-particle interactions

Assuming that additive pair potentials are sufficient to describe the inter-particle interactions in solution, the local equilibrium solvent shell structure can be described using the pair correlation fiinction g r, r2). If the potential only depends on inter-particle distance, reduces to the radial distribution fiinction g(r) = g... 

We look first at deviations from the ideal-gas equation, caused by inter-particle interactions. Having described induced dipoles (and hydrogen bonds) the interaction strengths are quantified in terms of the van der Waals and virial equations of state. 

Here a and b are the standard Van der Waals constants. The Van der Waals constant a is associated with the isotropic inter-particle attraction. Each intermediate phase, i, is characterized by the anisotropic inter-particle interaction y. In this approach, for each phase i there are Q, l configurations all having y- = 0 and only a single configuration in which the formation of the anisotropic bonds with energy y is allowed. 

If there is no inter-particle interactions out of contact (V = 0), then the auxiliary equation (3.16) takes the simplest form... 

This is the same as Eq. (3.95) except that the last term with operator of encounter diffusion L is added. This operator is diagonal, but its elements may differ because of different inter-particle interactions or diffusion coefficients for different pairs. Nothing like that is expected for the given example of energy transfer, so that... 

Another closely related constraint is that of Galileian invariance. Suppose that a many-body wavefunction (r, t2, r ) satisfies the time-independent interacting N-particle Schrddinger equation with an external one-particle potential r(r). Then, provided that the inter-particle interaction depends on coordinate differences only, it is readily verified that a boosted wavefunction of the form... 

Thus, we first illustrate the method, when applied to a simple system of classical point particles and also identify the important elements of the method the inter-particle interactions, the initial state, the boundary conditions, and advancing the system in time. We then comment on some of these elements in a little more detail. 

Toi effective Curie-Weiss temperature due to inter-particle interactions... 

Systems of randomly oriented magnetic nanoparticles randomly dispersed in a supporting medium or matrix and that interact via dipole-dipole forces (last subsection) are systems having several energetically equivalent supermoment orientational states, at given temperatures and applied fields. As such, it is relevant to compare their magnetic behaviors with both the observed behaviors of canonical SG systems (dilute magnetic alloys such as MnCu) and the theoretical predictions from overly simple SG models. This has lead to a productive examination of the effects of dipolar and other inter-particle interactions in synthetic nanoparticle model systems that is reviewed below. Hopefully, this will in turn motivate the development of more realistic theoretical models of disordered dipolar systems. 

As a result of magnetic inter-particle interactions, each nanoparticle will feel a net local interaction field that can be modelled by a time-dependent local applied field, Hint(t). If the time variation of the local interaction field is either very fast or very slow compared to the relevant characteristic times (e.g., i) of the particle, then Hi t(t) can in turn be modelled as a static local field, that will, of course, depend on temperature and macroscopic applied field. The distributions of particle positions, orientations, and supermoments will determine the distribution of local interaction fields. These interaction fields are present in zero applied field and dramatically affect the behaviors of the individual nanoparticles and, consequently, of the sample as a whole. They achieve this in two important ways. First, they change the equilibrium magnetic properties of the sample, giving rise, for example, to superferromagnetic ordering or interaction Curie-Weiss behaviors (see below). Second, and possibly more importantly, they affect dynamic response, via their influence on SP dwell times. 

The main points are that there are at least two characteristic microscopic dwell times, at the level of a single nanoparticle, that they are field dependent, and that they are distributed, at the level of the sample, by two mechanisms via the distributions of particle properties (Eb, ps) and via the distribution of interaction fields Such is the added complexity due to inter-particle interactions. 

Dpolar hteractbns. Inter-particle interactions are important and are often dipolar in nature. These interactions have, to date, not been modeled correctly. Realistic calculations must include both the spatial distributions of average dipolar interaction fields (Eqn. 19) and the temporal fluctuations of the local dipolar interaction field. The latter fluctuations must have characteristic times that are comparable to the SP fluctuation times of the particles since the interaction field is directly caused by the neighboring supermoments. Indeed, for this reason, the concept of an interaction field must be replaced by a proper handling of inter-particle spatial and temporal correlations. This will determine the dynamics in assemblies of interacting particles and has not yet been attempted. 

Mssbauer spectroscopy The inclusion of anisotropic fluctuations, modeled as T+ T in uniaxial symmetry, in the presence of applied magnetic fields, exchange anisotropy, or inter-particle interactions, must be used as a starting assumption unless the more restricted assumption that all relevant fluctuations are much faster than the measurement frequency (x+, t Xm, in uniaxial symmetry) is justified independently. All other relevant realistic features (distributions of characteristics and properties ) must also be included, by applying as many justified theoretical constraints as possible. 

Main recent developments in magnetic nanoparticle systems Measurements on single magnetic nanoparticles Synthetic model systems ofmagnetic nanoparticles Inter-particle interactions and collective behavior Noteworthy attempts at dealing with nanoparticle complexity Interpreting the Mossbauer spectra of nanoparticle systems Needed areas of development... 

Here pj = pj +pjy + pj7 and U is the potential associated with the inter-particle interaction. The function/(/ , p ) is an example of a joint probability density function (see below). The staicture of the Hamiltonian (1.184) implies that f can be factorized into a term that depends only on the particles positions and terms that depend only on their momenta. This implies, as explained below, that at equilibrium positions and momenta are statistically independent. In fact, Eqs (1.183) and (1.184) imply that individual particle momenta are also statistically independent and so are the different cartesian components of the momenta of each particle. 

J. Rodriguez, D.L. Andrews, Inter-particle interaction induced by broadband radiation. Opt. Comm. 282 (2009) 2267. 

In this relation, N is the number density of the scattering microemulsion droplets and S(q) is the static structure factor. Equation (2.12) is only strictly valid for the case of monodisperse spheres. However, for the case of low polydispersities the occurring error is small [63, 64]. S(q) describes the interactions between and the spatial correlations of the droplets. These are in general well approximated by hard sphere interactions in microemulsion systems [65], The influence of inter-particle interactions as described by S(q) canbe estimated at least for S(0) using the Carnahan-Starling expression [52,64,66]... 

The particle size in microemulsion is essentially governed by two factors [30], namely (1) the number of droplets in the preparation and (2) the inter-particle interaction associated... 

---