Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

In-core model

Intermediate Format (YIF) [10], IBM s Sequential Synthesis In-core Model (SSIM) [19], CMU s well-known Value Trace (VT) [43], USC s Design Data Structure (DDS) [37], Irvine s Behavioral Intermediate Format [50] and ICarlsruhe s Internal Format (IF [17]. [Pg.12]

Uses a representation called the SSIM (Sequential Synthesis In-core Model). The SSIM contains linked dataflow and controlflow graphs, and is hierarchical, in that it can represent several modules at once, and each can be synthesized separately. [Pg.94]

Figure 3. The Sequential Synthesis In-Core Model SSDVf... Figure 3. The Sequential Synthesis In-Core Model SSDVf...
Dynamic models for ionic lattices recognize explicitly the force constants between ions and their polarization. In shell models, the ions are represented as a shell and a core, coupled by a spring (see Refs. 57-59), and parameters are evaluated by matching bulk elastic and dielectric properties. Application of these models to the surface region has allowed calculation of surface vibrational modes [60] and LEED patterns [61-63] (see Section VIII-2). [Pg.268]

In order to illustrate some of the basic aspects of the nonlinear optical response of materials, we first discuss the anliannonic oscillator model. This treatment may be viewed as the extension of the classical Lorentz model of the response of an atom or molecule to include nonlinear effects. In such models, the medium is treated as a collection of electrons bound about ion cores. Under the influence of the electric field associated with an optical wave, the ion cores move in the direction of the applied field, while the electrons are displaced in the opposite direction. These motions induce an oscillating dipole moment, which then couples back to the radiation fields. Since the ions are significantly more massive than the electrons, their motion is of secondary importance for optical frequencies and is neglected. [Pg.1266]

It has not proved possible to develop general analytical hard-core models for liquid crystals, just as for nonnal liquids. Instead, computer simulations have played an important role in extending our understanding of the phase behaviour of hard particles. Frenkel and Mulder found that a system of hard ellipsoids can fonn a nematic phase for ratios L/D >2.5 (rods) or L/D <0.4 (discs) [73] however, such a system cannot fonn a smectic phase, as can be shown by a scaling... [Pg.2557]

Wavelet transformation (analysis) is considered as another and maybe even more powerful tool than FFT for data transformation in chemoinetrics, as well as in other fields. The core idea is to use a basis function ("mother wavelet") and investigate the time-scale properties of the incoming signal [8], As in the case of FFT, the Wavelet transformation coefficients can be used in subsequent modeling instead of the original data matrix (Figure 4-7). [Pg.216]

In the irreversible limit R < 0.1), the adsorption front within the particle approaches a shock transition separating an inner core into which the adsorbate has not yet penetrated from an outer layer in which the adsorbed phase concentration is uniform at the saturation value. The dynamics of this process is described approximately by the shrinldng-core model [Yagi and Kunii, Chem. Eng. (Japan), 19, 500 (1955)]. For an infinite fluid volume, the solution is ... [Pg.1520]

Figure 3.S Schematic diagram of packing side chains In the hydrophobic core of colled-coll structures according to the "knobs In holes" model. The positions of the side chains along the surface of the cylindrical a helix Is pro-jected onto a plane parallel with the heUcal axis for both a helices of the coiled-coil. (a) Projected positions of side chains in helix 1. (b) Projected positions of side chains in helix 2. (c) Superposition of (a) and (b) using the relative orientation of the helices In the coiled-coil structure. The side-chain positions of the first helix, the "knobs," superimpose between the side-chain positions In the second helix, the "holes." The green shading outlines a d-resldue (leucine) from helix 1 surrounded by four side chains from helix 2, and the brown shading outlines an a-resldue (usually hydrophobic) from helix 1 surrounded by four side chains from helix 2. Figure 3.S Schematic diagram of packing side chains In the hydrophobic core of colled-coll structures according to the "knobs In holes" model. The positions of the side chains along the surface of the cylindrical a helix Is pro-jected onto a plane parallel with the heUcal axis for both a helices of the coiled-coil. (a) Projected positions of side chains in helix 1. (b) Projected positions of side chains in helix 2. (c) Superposition of (a) and (b) using the relative orientation of the helices In the coiled-coil structure. The side-chain positions of the first helix, the "knobs," superimpose between the side-chain positions In the second helix, the "holes." The green shading outlines a d-resldue (leucine) from helix 1 surrounded by four side chains from helix 2, and the brown shading outlines an a-resldue (usually hydrophobic) from helix 1 surrounded by four side chains from helix 2.
Figure 3.8 Schematic diagram of the dimeric Rop molecule. Each subunit comprises two a helices arranged in a coiled-coil structure with side chains packed into the hydrophobic core according to the "knobs in holes" model. The two subunits are arranged in such a way that a bundle of four a helices is formed. Figure 3.8 Schematic diagram of the dimeric Rop molecule. Each subunit comprises two a helices arranged in a coiled-coil structure with side chains packed into the hydrophobic core according to the "knobs in holes" model. The two subunits are arranged in such a way that a bundle of four a helices is formed.
Nuclear PSAs contain considerable uncertainty associated with the physical and chemical processes involved in core degradation, movement of the molten core in the reactor vessel, on the containment floor, and the response of the containment to the stresses placed upon it. The current models of these processes need refinement and validation. Because the geometry is greatly changed by small perturbations after degradation has commenced, it is not clear that the phenomcn.i can be treated. [Pg.380]

The factors tliat affect miconfined I apor cloud explosions me not well understood. In a model developed by William, it is assmned tliat ignition occurs at a point source, tliat tlie flame front travels out from tlie core at a flame speed S, and tliat the pressure waves produced by the flame generate a weak shock wave tliat travels ahead of tlie flame with a time-dependent velocity. Tlie equation for the flame speed for spherical systems is... [Pg.228]

Kihara20 used a core model in which the Lennard-Jones potential is assumed to hold for the shortest distance between the molecular cores instead of molecular centers. By use of linear, tetrahedral, and other shapes of cores, various molecules can be approximated. Thomaes,41 Rowlinson,35 Hamann, McManamey, and Pearse,14 Atoji and Lipscomb,1 Pitzer,30 and Balescu,4 have used other models of attracting centers and other mathemtical methods, but obtain similar conclusions. The primary effect is to steepen the potential curve so that in terms of inverse powers of the inter-... [Pg.73]

Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf [7] provided a new theoretical approach in which melting was ascribed to the unrestricted proliferation of dislocations at the temperature for which the free energy of formation of glide dislocation cores becomes negative. Several physicists have shown interest in this model which has not so far been accorded similar attention in the chemical literature. [Pg.2]

Fig. 1.—The arrangement of 45 spheres in icosahedral closest packing. At the left there is shown a single sphere, which constitutes the inner core. Next there is shown the layer of 12 spheres, at the corners of a regular icosahedron. The third model shows the core of 13 spheres with 20 added in the outer layer, each in a triangular pocket corresponding to a face of the icosahedron these 20 spheres lie at the corners of a pentagonal dodecahedron. The third layer is completed, as shown in the model at the right, by adding 12 spheres at corners of a large icosahedron the 32 spheres of the third layer lie at the corners of a rhombic triaconta-hedron. The fourth layer (not shown) contains 72 spheres. Fig. 1.—The arrangement of 45 spheres in icosahedral closest packing. At the left there is shown a single sphere, which constitutes the inner core. Next there is shown the layer of 12 spheres, at the corners of a regular icosahedron. The third model shows the core of 13 spheres with 20 added in the outer layer, each in a triangular pocket corresponding to a face of the icosahedron these 20 spheres lie at the corners of a pentagonal dodecahedron. The third layer is completed, as shown in the model at the right, by adding 12 spheres at corners of a large icosahedron the 32 spheres of the third layer lie at the corners of a rhombic triaconta-hedron. The fourth layer (not shown) contains 72 spheres.
It can be seen that the prediction 6a underestimates any results. This is because axial expansion is unrealistic, as indicated in Figure 4.2.8. On the other hand, prediction 5a covers almost all the results, except when the value of Vg is smaller than lOm/s. This is probably because of the usage of the mean pressure averaged over twice the radius of the vortex core in the model by Asato et al. [16], which is in quantitative agreement with the present vortex ring whose core diameter is about 25% the ring diameter. [Pg.54]

The soft-core model may be more convenient in molecular dynamics simulation, since a continuously differentiable potential is available to calculate the force. In the case of a hardcore potential, collision times of all atom pairs have to be monitored and used to control the time step. [Pg.629]

C for the steam gasification is shown in Fig. 3 where the shrinking core model predicts the experimental data very well. [Pg.571]

Figure 2 displays a qualitative correlation between the increase or decrease in CO desorption temperature and relative shifts in surface core-level binding energies (Pd(3d5/2), Ni(2p3/2), or Cu(2p3/2) all measured before adsorbing CO) [66]. In general, a reduction in BE of a core level is accompanied by an enhancement in the strength of the bond between CO and the supported metal monolayer. Likewise, an opposite relationship is observed for an increase in core-level BE. The correlation observed in Figure 2 can be explained in terms of a model based on initial-state effects . The chemisorption bond on metal is dominated by the electron density of the occupied metal orbital to the lowest unoccupied 27t -orbital of CO. A shift towards lower BE decreases the separation of E2 t-Evb thus the back donation increases and vice versa. [Pg.85]


See other pages where In-core model is mentioned: [Pg.81]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.2222]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.817]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.508]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.81 , Pg.83 ]




SEARCH



Core model

© 2024 chempedia.info