Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Impact process

Impact processes with finite collision time 27... [Pg.27]

Table I. Distribution of Excited H2+ Produced by Franck-Condon Electron Impact Processes with 50-Volt Ionizing Electrons... Table I. Distribution of Excited H2+ Produced by Franck-Condon Electron Impact Processes with 50-Volt Ionizing Electrons...
To further assess likely business impacts, process changes, training requirements, etc. [Pg.225]

Matsuda and Hata [287] have argued that the species that are detectable using OES only form a very small part (<0.1%) of the total amount of species present in typical silane deposition conditions. From the emission intensities of Si and SiH the number density of these excited states was estimated to be between 10 and 10 cm", on the basis of their optical transition probabilities. These values are much lower than radical densities. lO " cm . Hence, these species are not considered to partake in the deposition. However, a clear correlation between the emission intensity of Si and SiH and the deposition rate has been observed [288]. From this it can be concluded that the emission intensity of Si and SiH is proportional to the concentration of deposition precursors. As the Si and SiH excited species are generated via a one-electron impact process, the deposition precursors are also generated via that process [123]. Hence, for the characterization of deposition, discharge information from OES experiments can be used when these common generation mechanisms exist [286]. [Pg.80]

Any of the above blast, fire, or fragment effects have the potential to impact process plant buildings and their occupants. [Pg.14]

As discussed in Section 3.2.1, other explosion events can occur that impact process plant buildings, including condensed-phase explosions, uncontrolled chemical reactions, PV ruptures, and BLEVEs. Appendix A and Reference 5 describe the information needed and the methods available for calculating blast parameters from these events. [Pg.24]

Wear is the removal of surface material by one of three mechanisms erosion, abrasion, or cavitation. Erosion is the removal of a polymer s surface by abrasive materials carried in a fluid medium. We see this type of wear in plastic pipes used to transport waterborne slurries of minerals in mining operations and in vacuum transfer pipes used to convey powders in a stream of air. Abrasion is the result of two surfaces sliding against each other. We commonly observe abrasion of polymers in the fabrics of our clothes and upholstery. Cavitative wear is caused by voids in a liquid medium collapsing against a surface. It is essentially an impact process. Cavitation is a relatively uncommon cause of wear in polymers. Pump impellers are one of the few applications where polymers must resist this type of wear. [Pg.176]

Semiempirical treatments of the electron impact process attempt to formulate fairly simple equations containing parameters determined experimentally in order to reproduce the measured cross section and possibly determine cross sections for... [Pg.327]

This formalism was originally devised for single ionization of ground-state atoms, but has now been successfully applied to the calculation of electron impact ionization cross sections for a range of molecules, radicals, clusters, and excited state atoms. Like many of the semiempirical and semiclassical methods used to describe the electron impact process, the theory has its roots in work carried out by J.J. Thomson, who used classical mechanics to derive an expression for the atomic electron impact ionization cross section,2... [Pg.329]

In the impact process that involves large temperature differences (AT) between the surface and the droplet, such as the ones considered in this study (e.g., AT=300 500 C), the value for Res is about 0.5 1.0. Thus, the inertial force of the vapor flow would be of the same order of magnitude as the viscous force, and cannot be neglected in Eq. (47) for the vapor-flow model. [Pg.32]

The simulation shown in Fig. 10 is an impact of a saturated water droplet of 2.3 mm in diameter onto a surface of 400°C with an impact velocity of 65 cm/s, corresponding to a Weber number of 15. This simulation and all others presented in this study are conducted on uniform meshes (Ax — Ay — Az = A). The mesh resolution of the simulation shown in Fig. 10 was 0.08 mm in grid size, although different resolutions are also tested and the results are compared in Figs. 11 and 12. The average time-step in this case is around 5 ps. It takes 4000 iterations to simulate a real time of 20 ms of the impact process. The simulation... [Pg.34]

The impact process of a 3.8 mm water droplet under the conditions experimentally studied by Chen and Hsu (1995) is simulated and the simulation results are shown in Figs. 16 and 17. Their experiments involve water-droplet impact on a heated Inconel plate with Ni coating. The surface temperature in this simulation is set as 400 °C with the initial temperature of the droplet given as 20 °C. The impact velocity is lOOcm/s, which gives a Weber number of 54. Fig. 16 shows the calculated temperature distributions within the droplet and within the solid surface. The isotherm corresponding to 21 °C is plotted inside the droplet to represent the extent of the thermal boundary layer of the droplet that is affected by the heating of the solid surface. It can be seen that, in the droplet spreading process (0-7.0 ms), the bulk of the liquid droplet remains at its initial temperature and the thermal boundary layer is very thin. As the liquid film spreads on the solid surface, the heat-transfer rate on the liquid side of the droplet-vapor interface can be evaluated by... [Pg.45]

It should be noted that the dynamic conditions of droplet impact processes discussed above cover a large range of the actual conditions in many industrial processes, such as spray forming, thermal spray, spray combustion, spray cooling, and aircraft flight. Under these conditions, the spreading behavior of droplets on a flat surface is essentially governed by inertia and viscous effects (Fig. [Pg.198]

The incompressible models offer a simplified examination of the radial flow during droplet impact. The time scale of the impact process may be estimated using the following equation 1515 ... [Pg.382]


See other pages where Impact process is mentioned: [Pg.355]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.439]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 , Pg.4 , Pg.10 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info