Identity, documents

One flaw of this scheme is that identical documents served from multiple sites have different URLs. Also, URLs leading to the same document can become different if the server host has more than one name, or file system links are modifying the directory structure of the server. An alternative to the URL scheme called URN (uniform resource names ) is currently being discussed. A URN is an unique identifier of a document similar to an ISBN number, making copies and different versions of documents identifiable. The latest proposal in this area, backed by many scientific publishers, is the DOI (digital object identifier). 

It should be pointed out, that one of the existing negative points with bad economical and social consequences is the appearance of false and counterfeit securities, documents, notes as well as traveling cards, identity cards and etc. Each year the number of confiscated counterfeit notes is increased on 10%. 

If a toll process falls under the U.S. PSM or RMP regulations, it is a requirement to document the identity of the employee, the date of the training, and the means used to verify that the employee understood the training. Even when not required by regulations, this documentation will enable the toller to demonstrate a commitment to maintaining competent operating personnel. 

For any chemical whose identity is claimed as a trade secret, you must submit to EPA two versions of the substantiation form as prescribed in 40 CFR Part 350, published July 29, 1988 In the Federal Register (53 FR 28772). Use the order form In this document to obtain a copy of the rule and substantiation form. One version identifies the chemical the second version does not Identify the chemical specifically, but provides instead a generic identity. Only this latter version will be available to the public. For further explanation of the trade-secret provisions, see the instructions below... 

CAS number and the chemical name reported on page three must exactly match the listed section 313 CAS number and chemical name. Chemical categories should not be reported with a CAS number. A generic chemical name should only be provided if you are claiming the section 313 chemical identity as trade secret. Chemical names should be taken directly from the list in this document (see pages 40-48). Mixture names are to be entered in Part III, Section 1.4 if that is the sole identification. Mixture names that include the name (or CAS number) of one or more section 313 chemical(s) are not valid. 

A primary objective of any safety program is to maintain or reduce the level of risk in the process. The design basis, especially inherently safer features that are built into the installation, must be documented. Management of change programs must preserve and keep the base record current and protect against elimination of inherently safer features. For identical substitution, the level of risk in the process is... 

Is product identified in accordance with documented procedures when the identity is not inherently obvious ... 

An adequately documented requirement would be a written contract, schedule of work, and/or specification. However simple the requirement, it is wise to have it documented in case of a dispute later. The document needs to carry an identity and if subject to change, an issue status. In the simple case this is the serial numbered invoice and in more complicated transactions, it will be a multi-page contract with official contract number, date, and signatures of both parties. 

Note that in ISO/TS 16949 documented procedures are needed where the product identity is not inherently obvious - the where appropriate condition has been removed. If products are so dissimilar that inadvertent mixing would be unlikely to occur, a means of identifying the products is probably unnecessary. Inherently obvious in this context means that the physical differences are large enough to be visible to the untrained eye. Therefore functional differences, no matter how significant - as well as slight differences in physical characteristics, such as color, size, weight, appearance - would constitute an appropriate situation for documented identification procedures. 

Procedures for identifying product should start at the design stage when the product is conceived. The design should be given a unique identity, a name, or a number, and that should be used on all related documents. When the product emerges into production. 

You may not possess any documents that describe the purchased product. The only identity may be marked on the product itself or its container. Where there are no markings, information from the supplier s invoice or other such documents should be transferred to a label and attached to the product or the container. Documents need to be traceable to the products they represent. 

The standard doesn t require a procedure covering inspection and test status however, as clause 4.2 requires a documented quality system, you will need to document the methods employed to denote inspection and test status. If you use stamps you will need a register to allocate stamps to particular individuals and to indicate which stamps have been withdrawn. When a person hands in a stamp it is good practice to avoid using the same number for 12 months or so to prevent mistaken identity in any subsequent investigations. 

The modified FMEA approach has been used by the API to develop RP14C. In this document ten different process components have been analyzed and a Safety Analysis Table (SAT) has been developed for each component. A sample SAT for a pressure vessel is shown in Table 14-4. The fact that Tables 14-3 and 14-4 are not identical is due to both the subjective natures of a Hazard Analysis and FMEA, and to the fact that RP14C is a consensus standard. However, although the rationale differs somewhat, the devices required are identical. (The gas make-up system in Table 14-4 is not really required by RP14C, as we shall see.)... 

In contrast to the steric effoits, the purely electronic influences of substituents are less clear. They are test documented by linear free-energy relationships, which, for the cases in question, are for the most part only plots of voltammetrically obtained peak oxidation potentials of corresponding monomers against their respective Hammett substituent constant As a rule, the linear correlations are very good for all systems, and prove, in aax>rdance with the Hammett-Taft equation, the dominance of electronic effects in the primary oxidation step. But the effects of identical substituents on the respective system s tendency to polymerize differ from parent monomer to parent monomer. Whereas thiophenes which receive electron-withdrawing substituents in the, as such, favourable P-position do not polymerize at all indoles with the same substituents polymerize particularly well... 

Plots should be clearly labeled, and the trial/study identity should be marked in the vicinity of the trial. Plots should be clearly triangulated to fixed points so that at a later date independent third parties can identify separate plots on the basis of documentation. 

Contact with the shoppers was restricted to field phase management study personnel, for two reasons. First, clearly defined lines of communication had to be maintained. Second, in order to ensure that the identity of the stores remained blind (i.e., unknown to everyone downstream from sample collection), in compliance with one of the design criteria, communication with the shoppers had to be restricted. Overall, limiting contact with shoppers to one entity and using modern technology, such as facsimiles and e-mail to facilitate and document communications between shoppers and the collection coordinator, were essential factors in the successful conduct of the sampling phase of the study. 

Testing must be conducted in a typical end-user environment, or in a simulated end-user environment, identical with the environment where the software/computer system will be used. Documentation of testing can be recorded as raw data, such as in a logbook, and should include the parameters tested, and the results of testing. The data should be tabulated as a final report document that includes all details included in the test plan, their execution, the results, and conclusions. The final report document must be signed by appropriate personnel, reviewed as needed, and archived. Upon successful completion of testing, the software/computer system can be released for testing and use in an actual end-user environment. 

The success of electronic submissions depends on the ability of industry to publish documents electronically and on paper. These versions must be identical the electronic version must offer the ease of use of the Web. The current way of thinking is in the direction of how do we get our data on to paper . Perhaps a better way to think... 

---