Ideal Nonpolarizable

The Extreme Cases of Ideally Nonpolarizable and Polarizable Interfaces... 

Are nonpolarizable and polarizable interfaces fictions, or can one find them in the laboratory The fact is that such interfaces can indeed be fabricated and have been used in double-layer studies. Of course, no interface is ideally nonpolarizable or ideally polarizable, i.e., nonpolarizable interfaces do change their potential to some extent and polarizable interfaces do resist such changes to some extent. The distinction is one of degree rather than kind. 

Define the following terms used in Section 6.3 (a) electrochemical cell, (b) ideally nonpolarizable and polarizable interfaces, (c) relative electrode potential, (d) outer potential, (e) inner potential, (1) surface potential, (g) image forces, (h) Coulombic forces, (i) electrochemical potential, (j) chemical potential, (k) electron work function, (1) just outside the metal, and (m) absolute potential. (Gamboa-Aldeco)... 

Impedance spectroscopy a single interface. Draw the equivalent circuits for the following electrode/electrolyte interfaces, then derive their impedance expression and explain what their Cole-Cole plot will look like (a) An ideally polarizable interface between electrode and electrolyte, (b) An ideally nonpolarizable interface between electrode and electrolyte, (c) A real-life electrode/... 

An -> ideal nonpolarizable electrode is one whose potential does not change as current flows in the cell. Much more useful in electrochemistry are the electrodes that change their potential in a wide potential window (in the absence of a - depolarizer) without the passage of significant current. They are called -> ideally polarized electrodes. Current-potential curves, particularly those obtained under steady-state conditions (see -> Tafel plot) are often called polarization curves. In the -> corrosion measurements the ratio of AE/AI in the polarization curve is called the polarization resistance. If during the -> electrode processes the overpotential is related to the -> diffusional transport of the depolarizer we talk about the concentration polarization. If the electrode process requires an -> activation energy, the appropriate overpotential and activation polarization appear. 

According to Onsager, a reaction field is the electric field arising from an interaction between an ideal nonpolarizable point dipole and a homogeneous polarizable dielectric continuum in which the dipole is immersed [80]. The reaction field is the electric field felt by the solute molecule due to the orientation and/or electronic polarization of the solvent molecules by the solute dipole. 

It may be appropriate to ask here why the potential at a reversible electrode should change at all with current density. This does not occur because "no system is really ideally polarizable", and one is observing a small polarization. Indeed the relationship shown in Eq. 17D holds strictly only when the interphase is ideally nonpolariz-able. Each value of the potential given by Eq. 17D represents the reversible potential for the concentration of the species at the surface, C(s). These concentrations deviate, however, from the corresponding bulk concentrations C° as a result of mass-transport limitations, according to Eq. 13D. 

It is interesting to see how the electrocapillary equation is modified if the interphase is ideally nonpolarizable. To do this, let us consider the cell... 

But the Mg/Il O inlerphase is not ideally polarizable in this case How is the notion of an ideally nonpolarizable interphase introduced into... 

Equations 49H and 50H explain why there has been little interest in obtaining the electrocapillary curve for ideally nonpolarizable interphases. On the other hand, this analysis can give us a feel for the type and magnitude of error that may arise when measurements are conducted with an electrode that is presumed to be ideally polarizable but in fact does allow some faradaic current to flow across the interphase. 

The last two terms on the right-hand side of this equation may be considered to be negligible, since metal-metal interphases behave as ideally nonpolarizable Interphases. The voltage drop across the... 

For the ideally polarizable interphase, they are all independent. For the ideally nonpolarizable interphase, only two can be controlled independently. We recall that an ideally nonpolarizable electrode is a reversible electrode. By setting the concentrations (more accurately, the activities) of ions in the two phases, we determine the potential. Alternatively, by selling the potential, we determine the ratio of concentrations of this ion in the two phases. We conclude that the electrocapillary equation for the nonpolarizable interphase must have one less degree of freedom. 

The electrochemical interface is considered as ideally polarizable when the application of any potential difference between both the phases produces no charge transfer across it. In this case, when an electrical potential is applied, a transient current (capacitive current) related to the electric charges on both sides of the interface can be measured. The reverse situation is the ideally nonpolarizable electrochemical interface. In this case, for any applied electric potential the charge transfer across the interface involves a transient capacitive current and a faradaic current that is exclusively related to an electrochemical reaction. Real electrochemical interfaces are intermediate between the two limiting polarization situations. 

Consider a cell composed of two ideal nonpolarizable electrodes, for example, two SCEs immersed in a potassium chloride solution SCE/KCl/SCE. The i-E characteristic of this cell would look like that of a pure resistance (Figure 1.3.8), because the only limitation on current flow is imposed by the resistance of the solution. In fact, these conditions (i.e., paired, nonpolarizable electrodes) are exactly those sought in measurements of solution conductivity. For any real electrodes (e.g., actual SCEs), mass-transfer and charge-transfer overpotentials would also become important at high enough current densities. 

Figure 1.3.8 Current-potential curve for a cell composed of two electrodes approaching ideal nonpolarizability.

A key point to realize is that quaternary ammonium salts commonly employed as PT catalysts exhibit a finite solubility in aqueous as well as in a variety of organic solvents. According to Eq. (5), the partitioning of an ion induces a Galvani potential difference between the electrolyte phases, which is determined by the difference in the solvation energies of the ion. Similar ions have been used for electrochemical studies at the ideally nonpolarizable ITIES [86,87]. 

Based on these ideas, Cunnane et al. [88] compared the oxidation of tin diphthalo-cyanine [Sn(PC)2] in the DCE phase by aqueous ferri/ferrocyanide redox couple under external polarization and in ideally nonpolarizable conditions. Good correlation for the formal redox potential measured in each case was observed. One of the main conclusions of this work is that the role of PT catalysts can be simply associated with polarization of the two-phase system, resulting in an enhancement of the interfacial concentration of the... 

Ideally Polarizable Electrodes and Ideally Nonpolarizable Electrodes. 101... 

Two limiting cases for the description of an electrode are the ideally polarizable electrode and the ideally nonpolarizable electrode [8, 9, 14], The ideally polarizable electrode corresponds to an electrode for which the Zfaiadaic element has infinite resistance (i.e., this element is absent). Such an electrode is modeled as a pure capacitor, with Cdi = Aq 6V (equation 26), in series with the solution resistance. In an ideally polarizable electrode, no electron transfer occurs across the electrode/electrolyte interface at any potential when current is passed rather all current is through capacitive action. No sustained current flow is required to support a large voltage change across the electrode interface. An ideally polarizable electrode is not used as a reference electrode, since the electrode potential is easily perturbed... 

Consider a metal electrode consisting of a silver wire placed inside the body, with a solution of silver ions between the wire and ECF, supporting the reaction Ag" + e <— Ag. This is an example of an electrode of the first kind, which is defined as a metal electrode directly immersed into an electrolyte of ions of the metal s salt. As the concentration of silver ions [Ag" ] decreases, the resistance of the interface increases. At very low silver ion concentrations, the Faradaic impedance Zfaradaic becomes very large, and the interface model shown in Fig. 3(a) reduces to a solution resistance in series with the capacitance C. Such an electrode is an ideally polarizable electrode. At very high silver concentrations, the Faradaic impedance approaches zero and the interface model of Fig. 3(a) reduces to a solution resistance in series with the Faradaic impedance Zfaradaic. which is approximated by the solution resistance only. Such an electrode is an ideally nonpolarizable electrode. 

---