Interface nonpolarizable

Thermodynamically, all metal/solution interfaces are nonpolarizable, i.e., they can exchange electrical charges freely across the phase boundary. It is the extreme slowness of these exchanges that turns a nonpolarizable into a polarizable interface. Therefore polarizable interfaces are a limiting case of nonpolarizable interfaces.2... 

Nonpolarizable interfaces correspond to interfaces on which a reversible reaction takes place. An Ag wire in a solution containing Ag+ions is a classic example of a nonpolarizable interface. As the metal is immersed in solution, the following phenomena occur3 (1) solvent molecules at the metal surface are reoriented and polarized (2) the electron cloud of the metal surface is redistributed (retreats or spills over) (3) Ag+ ions cross the phase boundary (the net direction depends on the solution composition). At equilibrium, an electric potential drop occurs so that the following electrochemical equilibrium is established ... 

For an ideally polarizable electrode, q has a unique value for a given set of conditions.1 For a nonpolarizable electrode, q does not have a unique value. It depends on the choice of the set of chemical potentials as independent variables1 and does not coincide with the physical charge residing at the interface. This can be easily understood if one considers that q measures the electric charge that must be supplied to the electrode as its surface area is increased by a unit at a constant potential." Clearly, with a nonpolarizable interface, only part of the charge exchanged between the phases remains localized at the interface to form the electrical double layer. 

A nonpolarizable interface behaves as a capacitor C and a resistor R in parallel a polarizable interface responds as a pure capacitor. The higher the resistance R, the closer the behavior of the former to the latter. For R —> °o, a nonpolarizable interface becomes polarizable. The condition / — < corresponds to Am —> 0. This condition is met when the amount of M+ in the null solution is negligibly small. 

Nonpolarizable interfaces, 2 Non-ideal solutions, Parsons-Zobel plot for, 55 Nucleation... 

Murphy and Waynewright, and change of upthrust on emersed metal, as a method of measuring, 34 Nikitas, at the air-solution interface, 30 in non-aqueous solutions, 71 for a nonpolarizable electrode, 4... 

The tip current depends on the rate of the interfacial IT reaction, which can be extracted from the tip current vs. distance curves. One should notice that the interface between the top and the bottom layers is nonpolarizable, and the potential drop is determined by the ratio of concentrations of the common ion (i.e., M ) in two phases. Probing kinetics of IT at a nonpolarized ITIES under steady-state conditions should minimize resistive potential drop and double-layer charging effects, which greatly complicate vol-tammetric studies of IT kinetics. 

In Ref. 30, the transfer of tetraethylammonium (TEA ) across nonpolarizable DCE-water interface was used as a model experimental system. No attempt to measure kinetics of the rapid TEA+ transfer was made because of the lack of suitable quantitative theory for IT feedback mode. Such theory must take into account both finite quasirever-sible IT kinetics at the ITIES and a small RG value for the pipette tip. The mass transfer rate for IT experiments by SECM is similar to that for heterogeneous ET measurements, and the standard rate constants of the order of 1 cm/s should be accessible. This technique should be most useful for probing IT rates in biological systems and polymer films. 

Warren GL, Patel S (2008) Comparison of the solvation structure of polarizable and nonpolarizable ions in bulk water and near the aqueous liquid-vapor interface. J Phys Chem C 112(19) 7455-7467... 

In electrochemistry, the electrode at which no transfer of electrons and ions occurs is called the polarizable electrode, and the electrode at which the transfer of electrons and/or ions takes place is called the nonpolarizable electrode as shown in Fig. 4-4. The term of polarization in electrochemistry, different from dipole polarization in physics, indicates the deviation in the electrode potential from a specific potential this specific potential is usually the potential at which no electric current flows across the electrode interface. To polarize" means to shift the electrode potential from a specific potential in the anodic (anodic polarization) or in the cathodic (cathodic polarization) direction. 

The nonpolarizable electrode may also be defined as the electrode at which an electron or ion transfer reaction is essentiaUy in equilibrium i. e. the electron or ion level in the electrode is pinned at the electron level of hydrated redox particles or at the hydrated ion level in aqueous electrolyte. In order for the electrode reaction to be in equilibrium at the interface of nonpolarizable electrode, an appreciable concentration of redox particles or potential determining ions must exist in the electrolyte. 

Next, we consider the interface M/S of a nonpolarizable electrode where electron or ion transfer is in equilibrium between a solid metal M and an aqueous solution S. Here, the interfadal potential is determined by the charge transfer equilibrium. As shown in Fig. 4-9, the electron transfer equilibrium equates the Fermi level, Enn) (= P (M)), of electrons in the metal with the Fermi level, erredox) (= P s)), of redox electrons in hydrated redox particles in the solution this gives rise to the inner and the outer potential differences, and respectively, as shown in Eqn. 4-10 ... 

Nikitas, isotherms, 936, 952, 1195 Nitrobenzene reduction, 1376 Nonaqueous solutions, coadsorption of hydrogen and organic molecules, 13-10 see also hydrogen coadsorption Non -faradaic electrochemical modification of catalytic activity, 1371 Nonlocalized adsorption, 928, 958 Nonpolarizable interfaces, 812, 857, 1055, 1060, 1111... 

Imagine, however, at M2/S, a nonpolarizable20 interface (to be described further later) which is characterized by the fact that the potential across it does not change except under extreme duress (i.e., a large change in input potential). Then, for small changes 8 V at the external source, the potential difference across the nonpolarizable interface will not depart significantly from its fixed value, i.e.,... 

One can now resort to a simple artifice. Combine the interface understudy, M,/S, with an interface that resists changes in potential, i.e., a nonpolarizable interface M2/S (Fig. 6.32). By using this electrochemical system, or cell, all changes in the potential of the source find their way to only one interface, i.e., that under study. An excellent method of producing changes in potential at one interface only has thus been devised. 

Of course, this argument implies that the M, /S interface is completely polarizable. This is important. The point is that the power supply requires that the whole cell change its potential difference by an amount 8V. Only if one interface is completely nonpolarizable and the other one completely polarizable can the latter wholly accept the changes of potential put out by the source. If both interfaces are partially nonpolarizable, then the potential differences across both of them will change and the experimenter will be at a loss to know the magnitude of the individual changes at each interface. 

The Extreme Cases of Ideally Nonpolarizable and Polarizable Interfaces... 

Are nonpolarizable and polarizable interfaces fictions, or can one find them in the laboratory The fact is that such interfaces can indeed be fabricated and have been used in double-layer studies. Of course, no interface is ideally nonpolarizable or ideally polarizable, i.e., nonpolarizable interfaces do change their potential to some extent and polarizable interfaces do resist such changes to some extent. The distinction is one of degree rather than kind. 

Fig. 6.33. (a) The equivalent circuit for an electrified interface is a capacitor and resistor connected in parallel, (b) In the equivalent circuit for an ideally polarizable interface, the resistance tends to infinity, and fora nonpolarizable interface, the resistance tends to zero. 

The essential feature of a nonpolarizable interface is that the potential difference across it remains effectively a constant as the potential applied to a cell that contains the nonpolarizable electrode changes. This property of nonpolarizable interfaces can be taken advantage of to develop a scale of relative potential differences across interfaces. 

Nonpolarizable Interfaces and Thermodynamic Equilibrium. It has just been shown that for an interface to be in thermodynamic equilibrium, the electrochemical potentials of all the species must he the same in both the phases constituting the interface. Since the difference in electrochemical potential of a species i between two phases is the work done to cany a mole of this species from one phase (e.g., the electrode) to the other (e.g., the solution), it must be the same as the work in the opposite direction. This implies a free flow of species across the interface. However, an interface that maintains an open border is none other than a nonpolarizable interface (see Section 63.3). 

A simple conclusion follows Thermodynamic equilibrium exists at a nonpolarizable interface. Hence, one can immediately apply the criterion of thermodynamic equilibrium to a nonpolarizable interface. That is, from Eq. (6.38),... 

This equation may be utilized whenever a nonpolarizable interface is treated. 

When j is the species that is exchanged across the nonpolarizable interface (i.e., the species involved in the charge-transfer reaction leading to the leakage of charge across the interface), it is customary to say that the interface, or the electrode, is reversible with respect to the species j. 

Consider mercury as the liquid metal under study. One of the advantages of this metal is that the mercuiy/solution interface approaches closest to the ideal polarizable interface (see Section 6.3.3) over a range of 2 V. What this means is that this interface responds exactly to all the changes in the potential difference of an external source when it is coupled to a nonpolarizable interface, and there are no complications of charges leaking through the double layer (charge-transfer reactions). 

One electrochemical system that can be used to measure the surface tension of the mercuiy/solution interface is shown in Fig. 6.50. The essential parts are (1) a mercuiy/solution polarizable interface, (2) a nonpolarizable interface, (3) an external source of variable potential difference V, and (4) an arrangement to measure the surface tension of the mercuiy in contact with the solution.39... 

What are the capabilities of this system Since the system consists of a polarizable interface coupled to a nonpolarizable interface, changes in the potential of the external source are almost equal to the changes of potential only at the polarizable interface, i.e., the changes in zl< ) across the mercuiy/solution interface are almost equal to changes in potential difference Vacross the terminals of the source. Hence, the system can be used to produce predetermined zl< ) changes at the mercuiy/solution interface (Section 6.3.11). Further, measurement of the surface tension of the mercuiy/solution interface is possible, and since this has been stated /Section 6.4.5) to be related to the surface excess, it becomes possible to measure this quantity for a given species in the interphase. In short, the system permits what are called electrocapillary measurements, i.e., the measurement of the surface tension of the... 

The nonpolarizable characteristics of the second interface M2/S, which is a necessary part of the cell and measuring setup, are now introduced. It is recalled that there is thermodynamic equilibrium at this interface, and thus... 

The nonpolarizable interface has been defined above (Section 6.3.3) as one which, at constant solution composition, resists any change in potential due to a change in cell potential. This implies that (3s Ma< )/3V)jl = 0. However, the inner potential difference at such an interface can change with solution composition hence, Eq. (6.89) can be rewritten in the form of dM7ds< > = (RT/ZjF) d In a, which is the Nemst equation [see Eq. (7.51)] in differential form for a single interface. 

Now consider a polarizable interface that consists of a metal electrode in contact with a solution of a l l-valent electrolyte (i.e., Z+ = 1 and z = -1). It will be remembered that in order to apply electrocapillaiy thermodynamics to a polarizable interface Mj/S, the interface has to be assembled in a cell along with a nonpolarizable interface. Suppose that the nonpolarizable interface is one at which negative ions interchange charge with the metal surface, i.e., Zj = — 1. Hence, Eq. (6.99) for the polarizable interface becomes... 

---