Hydrodynamic potential step

We will first briefly consider some of the treatments of potential step and current step techniques at hydrodynamic electrodes. One should bear in mind, however, that this division is somewhat artificial owing to the implicit dependence of one on the other. We then treat a.c. voltammetric techniques, LSV, and finally consider hydrodynamic modulation. 

Electrochemical systems can be studied with methods based on impedance measurements. These methods involve the application of a small perturbation, whereas in the methods based on linear sweep or potential step the system is perturbed far from equilibrium. This small imposed perturbation can be of applied potential, of applied current or, with hydrodynamic electrodes, of convection rate. The fact that the perturbation is small brings advantages in terms of the solution of the relevant mathematical equations, since it is possible to use limiting forms of these equations, which are normally linear (e.g. the first term in the expansion of exponentials). 

An armoury of powerful electrochemical methods is available. Potential step techniques such as differential pulse DP or square-wave SW voltammetry offer advantages in sensitivity and resolution. Hydrodynamic techniques involving use of rotating disc or rotating ring-disc electrodes allow the chemical steps of the electrode process to be separated from mass transport. Electrochemical transformations may be monitored optically with spectroelectrochemical methods. Even the electrode interface itself is amenable to study by in situ spectroscopic techniques. Detailed descriptions of these methods are to be found in appropriate texts [1-4]. 

Other techniques for studying protein molecnles in solntion are less infln-enced by these microscopic effects. Square-wave voltammetry is widely used due to its great sensitivity, and even a low density of productive sites on the electrode may give rise to a sharp and analyzable response [28]. The electrode may also be rotated to achieve forced convection and hydrodynamic control of solution redox species, while amperometric (and coulometric) measurements—where the current (or charge) is recorded following a potential step—enable the time and potential domains to be deconvoluted [28,29]. These options complement each other to provide a detailed picture of the thermodynamics and kinetics of redox processes. Finally, bulk electrolytic methods enable samples of a particular redox state to be prepared quantitatively for spectroscopic examination, at precise electrode potentials that may lie outside the range of conventional chemical titrants. 

Similarly to the response at hydrodynamic electrodes, linear and cyclic potential sweeps for simple electrode reactions will yield steady-state voltammograms with forward and reverse scans retracing one another, provided the scan rate is slow enough to maintain the steady state [28, 35, 36, 37 and 38]. The limiting current will be detemiined by the slowest step in the overall process, but if the kinetics are fast, then the current will be under diffusion control and hence obey the above equation for a disc. The slope of the wave in the absence of IR drop will, once again, depend on the degree of reversibility of the electrode process. 

The aforementioned experiments at rotating electrodes concerned merely steady-state conditions so-called transients123 at these electrodes, e.g., with potential or current steps, as well as with hydrodynamic modulation, i.e., variation of co with time, are, as a consequence of their non-steady-state conditions, less important in analysis and therefore will not be treated here. 

In Chapter 3 the steady-state hydrodynamic aspects of two-phase flow were discussed and reference was made to their potential for instabilities. The instability of a system may be either static or dynamic. A flow is subject to a static instability if, when the flow conditions change by a small step from the original steady-state ones, another steady state is not possible in the vicinity of the original state. The cause of the phenomenon lies in the steady-state laws hence, the threshold of the instability can be predicted only by using steady-state laws. A static instability can lead either to a different steady-state condition or to a periodic behavior (Boure et al., 1973). A flow is subject to a dynamic instability when the inertia and other feedback effects have an essential part in the process. The system behaves like a servomechanism, and knowledge of the steady-state laws is not sufficient even for the threshold prediction. The steady-state may be a solution of the equations of the system, but is not the only solution. The above-mentioned fluctuations in a steady flow may be sufficient to start the instability. Three conditions are required for a system to possess a potential for oscillating instabilities ... 

The potential response of the RDE to current steps has been treated analytically [3, 237, 251] and accurately by Hale using numerical integration [252] this enables the elucidation of kinetic parameters [185, 253]. A current density—transition time relationship at the RDE has been established which accounts for observed differences from the Sand equation [eqn. (218)] and which has been applied to EC reactions [254]. Other hydrodynamic solid electrodes have not been considered in detail, although reversible reactions at channel electrodes have been discussed [255, 256]. 

CV has become a standard technique in all fields of chemistry as a means of studying redox states. The method enables a wide potential range to be rapidly scanned for reducible or oxidizable species. This capability, together with its variable time scale and good sensitivity, makes CV the most versatile electroanalytical technique thus far developed. It must, however, be emphasized that its merits are largely in the realm of qualitative or diagnostic experiments. Quantitative measurements (of rates or concentrations) are best obtained via other means (e.g., step, pulse, or hydrodynamic techniques). Because of the kinetic control of many CV experiments, some caution is advisable when evaluating the results in terms of thermodynamic parameters (e.g., measurement of E° for irreversible couples). 

The earliest applications of acoustic levitation in analytical chemistry were concerned with the development of various steps of the analytical process. Thus, Welter and Neidhart [72] studied the preconcentration of n-hexanol in methanol by solvent evaporation and the liquid-liquid extraction of n-hexanol from water to toluene in a levitated droplet, which they found to be efficient when using GC-FID with n-pentanol as internal standard. Solvent exchange of fluorescein from methylisobutyl ketone to aqueous sodium hydroxide was also accomplished. Sample concentration in an acoustically levitated droplet prior to injection into a CE equipped with an LIF or UV detector has also been accomplished [73,118]. The target analytes (namely, dansylated amino acids) were concentrated in the levitated drop and a limit of detection of 15 nM — much lower than the 2.5 pM achieved by hydrodynamic injection without preconcentration — was achieved following CE separation and quantification. For this purpose, 36000 sample droplets 2.3 pi in volume each were sequentially positioned in the acoustic Ievitator and evaporated. This example illustrates the potential of acoustic levitation for coupling to any type of detector for micro- or nanotrace analyses. 

The second step, the Interpretation in terms of -potentials and conductivities. requires theory. For non-dilute dispersions this implies consideration of hydrodynamic and electrostatic particle Interaction. James et al. l, working with poly(styrene) and poly(methyl methacrylate) latlces, alumina and silica sols confirmed that u obtained from ESA agreed with the (static) values, obtained mlcro-electrophoretlcally. if the theory by O Brien (see [4.3.45-481) was applied in the analysis. Marlow et al. already noted the same for dilute rutile dispersions their mobility (or Q curves as a function of pH agreed with those in flg. 3.63. 

Thus by taking the size of the maximum allowed displacement FT1 in the Metropolis MC so small that forces acting on a particle remain essentially constant during the MC time step, the method turns into a Brownian dynamics simulation [8,9,11]. It was successfully applied to Brownian motion of a particle under a harmonic potential [8] as well as to the orientation of a dipolar particle in an applied electric field [12] and extended to include hydrodynamic interactions [10]. 

The aim of the ED step is to provide a compact, adherent, laterally uniform precursor film with the desired stoichiometry for commercial appHcations, lateral compositional uniformity needs to be guaranteed over large areas. The desired properties can only be obtained if the ED process is properly controlled. The nature of deposited layers depends on electrode material, precursor species in solution, applied potential program, hydrodynamic conditions, and temperature. Eor single metal systems, these factors are well understood. Eor deposition of multiple elements including a chalcogen, the ED process becomes substantially more complex. 

When the drops are close together, whatever the driving force that makes them approach, the film that is located between neighboring drops exhibits a complex drainage process that involves several different mcchanisnu. and this controls the second step of the emulsion decay. Some of them depend on the drop volume tike the van der Waals attractive forces, or the Archimedes pull, white others depend on the interdrop film physical properties such as viscosity, or on the interfacial phenomena chat occur whenever two interfaces approach at sub micrometer range. The first class of inlerfacial phenomena deals with static attractive or repulsive forces, like electrical, steric, or eniropic repulsions, while the second one has to do with dynamic processes like the steaming potential and interfaciat viscosity effects, as well as the more classical hydrodynamic considerations (19-23). 

Fig.2. Hydrodynamic voltammogram of glucose. Constructed from the peak height of the flow injection response. The electrode was reconditioned via potential program (-200 to +700 to 450 mV, 15 minutes at each step) between each change of potential. Flow rate 1 ml/min, injection volume 65 /il, analyte ImM glucose in 1 M NaOH, carrier stream 1 M NaOH.

---