Human exposure toxicity

Duration of Dosing in Duration of Human Exposure Toxicity Study... 

Health and Safety Factors. Sulfur hexafluoride is a nonflammable, relatively unreactive gas that has been described as physiologically inert (54). The current OSHA standard maximum allowable concentration for human exposure in air is 6000 mg/m (1000 ppm) TWA (55). The Underwriters Laboratories classification is Toxicity Group VI. It should be noted, however, that breakdown products of SF, produced by electrical decomposition of the gas, are toxic. If SF is exposed to electrical arcing, provision should be made to absorb the toxic components by passing the gas over activated alumina, soda-lime, or molecular sieves (qv) (56). 

Toxicity. Sulfur tetrafluoride has an inhalation toxicity comparable to phosgene. The current OSHA standard maximum allowable concentration for human exposure in air is 0.4 mg/m (TWA) (54). On exposure to moisture, eg, on the surface of skin, sulfur tetrafluoride Hberates hydrofluoric acid and care must be taken to avoid bums. One case of accidental exposure of electrical workers to decomposed SF gas containing SF has been cited (108). 

Health and Environment. Manganese in trace amounts is an essential element for both plants and animals and is among the trace elements least toxic to mammals including humans. Exposure to abnormally high concentrations of manganese, particulady in the form of dust and fumes, is, however, known to have resulted in adverse effects to humans (36,37) (see Mineral nutrients). 

Toxicology. The nitroparaffins have minimal effects by way of actual contact. There were neither systemic effects nor irritation in dermal studies in rabbits. Human exposure of a prolonged or often-repeated nature has led to low grade irritation attributable to removal of oil from the skin, an effect produced by most organic solvents. Eye irritation potential of all four nitroparaffins has been deterrnined in rabbits. Other than a transient slight redness and some lachrymation, no effects were noted. The average Draize score was 0.0. The acute oral toxicity, LD q, of all four nitroparaffins has been deterrnined in the rat (Table 8). 

Toluenediamine is classed as toxic. The oral LD q for animals is between 270—350 mg /kg body weight (45). TDA is readily absorbed through the skin and this is the major route of human exposure. Several studies have shown the 2,4 isomer of TDA to be carcinogenic for rats and mice, but tests on the 2,5 and 2,6 isomers were not positive. AH three of the isomers have been shown to be mutagenic (45). Results of limited studies on the reproductive ha2ards for male workers are equivocal, but animal experiments have shown TDA to cause adverse reproductive effects (45). 

The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) was enacted in 1976 to identify and control toxic chemical ha2ards to human health and the environment. One of the main provisions of TSCA was to estabUsh and maintain an inventory of all chemicals in commerce in the United States for the purpose of regulating any of the chemicals that might pose an unreasonable risk to human health or the environment. An initial inventory of chemicals was estabhshed by requiring companies to report to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) all substances that were imported, manufactured, processed, distributed, or disposed of in the United States. Over 50,000 chemical substances were reported. PoUowing this initial inventory, introduction of all new chemical substances requires a Premanufacturing Notification (PMN) process. To be included in the PMN are the identity of the new chemical, the estimated first year and maximum production volume, manufacture and process information, a description of proposed use, potential release to the environment, possible human exposure to the new substance, and any health or environmental test data available at the time of submission. In the 10 years that TSCA has been in effect, the USEPA has received over 10,000 PMNs and up to 10% of the submissions each year are for dyes (382)... 

In risk characterization, step four, the human exposure situation is compared to the toxicity data from animal studies, and often a safety -margin approach is utilized. The safety margin is based on a knowledge of uncertainties and individual variation in sensitivity of animals and humans to the effects of chemical compounds. Usually one assumes that humans are more sensitive than experimental animals to the effects of chemicals. For this reason, a safety margin is often used. This margin contains two factors, differences in biotransformation within a species (human), usually 10, and differences in the sensitivity between species (e.g., rat vs. human), usually also 10. The safety factor which takes into consideration interindividual differences within the human population predominately indicates differences in biotransformation, but sensitivity to effects of chemicals is also taken into consideration (e.g., safety faaor of 4 for biotransformation and 2.5 for sensitivity 4 x 2.5 = 10). For example, if the lowest dose that does not cause any toxicity to rodents, rats, or mice, i.e., the no-ob-servable-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) is 100 mg/kg, this dose is divided by the safety factor of 100. The safe dose level for humans would be then 1 mg/kg. Occasionally, a NOAEL is not found, and one has to use the lowest-observable-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) in safety assessment. In this situation, often an additional un-... 

Contains information drawn from data compiled by the National Toxicology Program (NTP), which coordinates and provides information about potentially toxic chemicals with potential for human exposure to regulatoiy and research agencies. Contains information on 2,280 chemicals drawn from literature. The records closely resemble an MSDSformat. Print, CD-ROM and online interactive versions available from the Coast Guard and commercial sources. 

Figure 3-5 graphically depicts the information that currently exists on the health effects of methyl parathion in humans and animals by various routes of exposure. The available literature reviewed concerning the health effects of methyl parathion in humans described case reports of longer-term studies of pesticide workers and case reports of accidental or intentional ingestion of methyl parathion. The occupational exposure is believed to be via the dermal and inhalation routes. The information on human exposure is limited in that the possibility of concurrent exposure to other pesticides or other toxic substances cannot be quantified. 

Releases to air, land, and water occur primarily through its use as a restricted-use insecticide. The media of most importance for human exposure are contaminated air and soil. According to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. Section 11023, industries are required to submit chemical release and ofif-site transfer information to the EPA. The Toxic Release Inventory (TRI), which contains this information for 1987, became available in May of 1988. This database is updated yearly and provides a list of industrial production facilities and emissions. 

Hazard characterization is a quantitative or semi-quantitative evaluation of the nature, severity, and duration of adverse health effects associated with biological, physical, or chemical agents that may be present in food. The characterization depends on the nature of the toxic effect or hazard. Eor some hazards such as genotoxic chemicals, there may be no threshold for the effect and therefore estimates are made of the possible magnitude of the risk at human exposure level (dose-response extrapolation). 

Envlroiunental testing Is a critical element In this process since It enables the qualitative and quantitative determination of toxic chemicals In the environment and the definition of environmental pathways which may lead to human exposure This paper briefly reviews the overall process of health risk assessments and the particular role which environmental testing plays Recent efforts to assess environmental health risks In relation to Love Canal Illustrate both the usefulness and the limitations of environmental testing In risk assessment ... 

With respect to sampling, sufficient numbers of environmental samples should be obtained to permit reliable statistical and biologic Interpretation of results. At the same time, the samples collected should be from environmental locations where human exposure Is most likely to occur (or did occur. If questions of past exposures require assessment). They should also be targeted for those environmental media which can be expected to have the greatest potential for human exposure and absorption. Finally, the samples must be obtained and preserved so that the chemicals which pose the greatest threat for human health In terms of toxicity and tissue persistence can be accurately measured. 

---