Heterogeneous catalysis diffusion

Diffusion in porous solids is usually the most important factor con-troUing mass transfer in adsorption, ion exchange, drying, heterogeneous catalysis, leaching, and many other applications. Some of the... 

For gas-phase diffusion in small pores at lowpressure, the molecular mean free path may be larger than the pore diameter, giving rise to Knudsen diffusion. Satterfield (Ma.s.s Tran.sfer in Heterogeneous Catalysis, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1970, p. 43), gives the following expression for the pore dimisivity ... 

Diffusivity and tortuosity affect resistance to diffusion caused by collision with other molecules (bulk diffusion) or by collision with the walls of the pore (Knudsen diffusion). Actual diffusivity in common porous catalysts is intermediate between the two types. Measurements and correlations of diffusivities of both types are Known. Diffusion is expressed per unit cross section and unit thickness of the pellet. Diffusion rate through the pellet then depends on the porosity d and a tortuosity faclor 1 that accounts for increased resistance of crooked and varied-diameter pores. Effective diffusion coefficient is D ff = Empirical porosities range from 0.3 to 0.7, tortuosities from 2 to 7. In the absence of other information, Satterfield Heterogeneous Catalysis in Practice, McGraw-HiU, 1991) recommends taking d = 0.5 and T = 4. In this area, clearly, precision is not a feature. 

In any catalyst selection procedure the first step will be the search for an active phase, be it a. solid or complexes in a. solution. For heterogeneous catalysis the. second step is also deeisive for the success of process development the choice of the optimal particle morphology. The choice of catalyst morphology (size, shape, porous texture, activity distribution, etc.) depends on intrinsic reaction kinetics as well as on diffusion rates of reactants and products. The catalyst cannot be cho.sen independently of the reactor type, because different reactor types place different demands on the catalyst. For instance, fixed-bed reactors require relatively large particles to minimize the pressure drop, while in fluidized-bed reactors relatively small particles must be used. However, an optimal choice is possible within the limits set by the reactor type. 

Knudsen diffusion is generally encountered in heterogeneous catalysis. In the smallest pores configurational diffusion takes place with diffusion coefficient ranging from 10 to 10 m /s. 

Inspection of Fig. 15.3 reveals that while for jo 0.1 nAcm , the effectiveness factor is expected to be close to 1, for a faster reaction with Jo 1 p,A cm , it will drop to about 0.2. This is the case of internal diffusion limitation, well known in heterogeneous catalysis, when the reagent concentration at the outer surface of the catalyst grains is equal to its volume concentration, but drops sharply inside the pores of the catalyst. In this context, it should be pointed out that when the pore size is decreased below about 50 nm, the predominant mechanism of mass transport is Knudsen diffusion [Malek and Coppens, 2003], with the diffusion coefficient being less than the Pick diffusion coefficient and dependent on the porosity and pore stmcture. Moreover, the discrete distribution of the catalytic particles in the CL may also affect the measured current owing to overlap of diffusion zones around closely positioned particles [Antoine et ah, 1998]. 

The surface diffusion of defects and adsorbates is of obvious importance in heterogeneous catalysis, as this process brings the reactants together. Understanding the dynamics of molecules on oxide surfaces is also a key step toward the realization of working molecular electronics. We note here that diffusion of Ob-vacs really means diffusion of Ob into the vacancy, which leaves another Ob-vac in the position vacated by the Ob- Similarly, diffusion of OHb occurs by diffusion of the H atom. 

A survey of the literature shows that although very different calorimeters or microcalorimeters have been used for measuring heats of adsorption, most of them were of the adiabatic type, only a few were isothermal, and until recently (14, 15), none were typical heat-flow calorimeters. This results probably from the fact that heat-flow calorimetry was developed more recently than isothermal or adiabatic calorimetry (16, 17). We believe, however, from our experience, that heat-flow calorimeters present, for the measurement of heats of adsorption, qualities and advantages which are not met by other calorimeters. Without entering, at this point, upon a discussion of the respective merits of different adsorption calorimeters, let us indicate briefly that heat-flow calorimeters are particularly adapted to the investigation (1) of slow adsorption or reaction processes, (2) at moderate or high temperatures, and (3) on solids which present a poor thermal diffusivity. Heat-flow calorimetry appears thus to allow the study of adsorption or reaction processes which cannot be studied conveniently with the usual adiabatic or pseudoadiabatic, adsorption calorimeters. In this respect, heat-flow calorimetry should be considered, actually, as a new tool in adsorption and heterogeneous catalysis research. 

Large zeolite crystals with dimensions of tens and hundreds of micrometers have proven to be irreplaceable as model materials for reactivity and diffusion studies in the field of zeolite science and heterogeneous catalysis [1-3], These large crystallites often possesses complex structures consisting of several intergrown subunits and since the pore orientations of the different elements are not always aligned, this phenomenon can have a considerable effect on the accessibility of the pores in different crystallite regions [4]. 

The simulation of reacting flows in packed tubes by CFD is still in its earliest stages. So far, only isothermal surface reactions for simplified geometries and elementary reactions have been attempted. Heterogeneous catalysis with diffusion, reaction, and heat transfer in solid particles coupled to the flow, species, and temperature fields external to the particles remains a challenge for the future. 

This example treats a diffusion-reaction process in a spherical biocatalyst bead. The original problem stems from a model of oxygen diffusion and reaction in clumps of animal cells by Keller (1991), but the modelling method also applies to bioflocs and biofilms, which are subject to potential oxygen limitation. Of course, the modelling procedure can also be applied generally to problems in heterogeneous catalysis. 

The philosophy used to develop detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms for gas-phase reactions can, in principle, be extended to treat heterogeneous reactions, provided diffusion is also considered in the final analysis. Clearly, the problem in heterogeneous catalysis is considerably more complex because of the close proximity of a large number of atoms and their collective effect on reaction kinetics and mechanisms, and the inevitable variation of catalyst structure with time—for example, as a result of sintering and poisoning. 

Three fundamental processes can limit overall reaction rates in heterogeneous catalysis mass transfer of the reactants from the bulk liquid phase(s) to the surface of the solid catalyst, diffusion of the reactants from the catalyst surface to the active site, and the intrinsic reaction at the active site 61,62). Each of these processes depends on one or more experimental parameters, as shown in Fig. 1. 

If adatom-impurity atom interaction is attractive, then the impurity atom can act as a trapping center. A diffusing adatom may be trapped. In heterogeneous catalysis, the reaction rate may be changed by the trapping effect of impurities as also by lattice defects and lattice steps and so on. 

As discussed earlier, the first step in heterogeneous catalysis is the adsorption of the molecules of the reactants on the surface of the adsorbent or of the catalyst (inner and outer surfaces). Then, molecular dissociation of at least one or two reacting components takes place, usually preceded by surface diffusion. The next step is a surface reaction, which is... 

Why adsorption, ion exchange and heterogeneous catalysis in one book The basic similarity between these phenomena is that they all are heterogeneous fluid-solid operations. Second, they are all driven by diffusion in the solid phase. Thus, mass transfer and solid-phase diffusion, rate-limiting steps, and other related phenomena are common. Third, the many aspects of the operations design of some reactors are essentially the same or at least similar, for example, the hydraulic analysis and scale-up. Furthermore, they all have important environmental applications, and more specifically they are all applied in gas and/or water treatment. 

---