Hardness properties macroscopic mechanical property

Perhaps the most significant complication in the interpretation of nanoscale adhesion and mechanical properties measurements is the fact that the contact sizes are below the optical limit ( 1 t,im). Macroscopic adhesion studies and mechanical property measurements often rely on optical observations of the contact, and many of the contact mechanics models are formulated around direct measurement of the contact area or radius as a function of experimentally controlled parameters, such as load or displacement. In studies of colloids, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been used to view particle/surface contact sizes from the side to measure contact radius [3]. However, such a configuration is not easily employed in AFM and nanoindentation studies, and undesirable surface interactions from charging or contamination may arise. For adhesion studies (e.g. Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR) [4] and probe-tack tests [5,6]), the probe/sample contact area is monitored as a function of load or displacement. This allows evaluation of load/area or even stress/strain response [7] as well as comparison to and development of contact mechanics theories. Area measurements are also important in traditional indentation experiments, where hardness is determined by measuring the residual contact area of the deformation optically [8J. For micro- and nanoscale studies, the dimensions of both the contact and residual deformation (if any) are below the optical limit. 

These include cold drawn, high pressure oriented chain-extended, solid slate extruded, die-drawn, and injection moulded polymers. Correlation of hardness to macroscopic properties is also examined. In summary, microhardness is shown to be a useful complementary technique of polymer characterization providing information on microscopic mechanical properties. 

Determination of die mechanical properties of a cured polymer serves to characterize its macroscopic (bulk) features such as flexibility and hardness. Using standardized methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and die International Standards Organization (ISO) allows direct comparison to otiier materials. The vast majority of polyurethane research and development is conducted in industry where mechanical properties are of vital importance because tins information is used to design, evaluate, and market products. General test categories are presented here with a few illustrative examples. 

The SMA effect can be traced to properties of two crystalline phases, called martensite and austenite, that undergo facile solid-solid phase transition at temperature Tm (dependent on P and x). The low-temperature martensite form is of body-centered cubic crystalline symmetry, soft and easily deformable, whereas the high-temperature austenite form is of face-centered cubic symmetry, hard and immalleable. Despite their dissimilar mechanical properties, the two crystalline forms are of nearly equal density, so that passage from austenite to a twinned form of martensite occurs without perceptible change of shape or size in the macroscopic object. 

The measurement of local mechanical properties is an important step in understanding of the macroscopic behavior of multiphase materials. The indentation hardness test is probably the simplest method of measuring the mechanical properties of materials. Figure 12.2b shows the evolution of the microhardness as a function of the thermal treatment temperature of a Nasicon sample. The use of load-controlled depth-sensing hardness testers which operate in the (sub)micron range enables the study of each component of the composite more precisely. 

When we glue a broken chair, light a match, walk on a street, or ski on snow, we make use of the mechanical properties of surfaces. These include (a) static properties such as hardness or adhesion and (b) dynamic properties such as slide, friction, lubrication, or fracture. The study of the mechanical properties of surfaces in relative motion is often called tribology. It is the purpose of surface scientists to describe and explore many of the macroscopic mechanical properties on the molecular level in order to provide fundamental answers to some simple questions Why are materials hard or soft How do the mechanical properties of surfaces enable us to walk What occurs when we repeatedly move surfaces relative to each other at variable speeds (such as the piston rod against the piston wall of the internal combustion engine) ... 

While the macroscopic concepts of hardness, adhesion, friction, and slide have evolved over the last two centuries, atomic level understanding of the mechanical properties of surfaces eluded researchers. The discovery of the atomic force microscope in recent years promises to change this state of affairs. Being able to measure forces as small as 10 newton or as large as 10 newton [5] over a very small surface area (few atoms) and by simultaneously providing atomic spatial resolution, this technique permits the study of deformation (elastic and plastic), hardness, and friction on the atomic scale. The buried interface between moving solid surfaces can be studied with spectroscopic techniques on the molecular level. Study of the mechanical properties of interfaces is, again, a frontier research area of surface chemistry. 

The indentation test is one of the simplest ways to measure mechanical properties of a material. The micromechanical behavior of polymers and the correlation with microstrnctnre and morphology have been widely investigated over the past two decades (23). Conventional microindentation instruments are based on the optical measnrement of the residual impression produced by a sharp indenter penetrating the specimen surface under a given load at a known rate. Microhardness is obtained by dividing the peak load by the contact area of impression. From a macroscopic point of view, hardness is directly correlated to the yield stress of the material, ie, the minimnm stress at which permanent strain is produced when the stress is snbseqnently removed. 

To fulfil this demand, immiscible blend components have traditionally found their synergistic properties utilized in macroscopic blend applications. As an example, for over fifty years polyamides have been blended with a multitude of partners to produce materials with a wide range of highly desirable properties these include improved mechanical properties (with poly(vinyl acetate)), increased hardness and molding stability (with ABS), excellent processability, low permeability and good printability (with polyolefins), and improved toughness (with alkenes or elastomers) [1]. 

It is difficult to determine the maximum matrix strain before cracks are open because it may vary considerably. In a more developed material structure, composed of inclusions, pores, fibres, etc., the value of is higher than in homogeneous ones like cement paste. As to the heterogeneity of the matrix, not only are the differences between hard inclusions, weaker paste and voids considered, but also the fact that certain macroscopic composite regions have considerably different mechanical properties than others. 

Recently V-alloys have been revisited as cladding candidates for Generation IV gas-cooled or Na-cooled fast reactors because of their superior nuclear performance as well as high-temperature mechanical properties [6]. Fig. 11.3 compares macroscopic neutron absorption cross-sections [7]. For V, the cross-section is high for thermal neutrons but very low for soft and hard neutrons, showing attractive neutron economy in fast reactor environments. 

---