Golgi cells appearance

Pumplin DW> Getschman E. 2000. Synaptic proteins in rat taste bud cells Appearance in the Golgi apparatus and relationship to a-gustducin and the Lewis and A antigens. J Comp Neurol 427 171-184. 

Summarizing it appears that the cellular and regional distribution of muscarine receptors in the cerebellum is different between different species. Golgi cells and subpopulations of mossy fibers seem to express muscarine receptors most constantly. An interesting aspect about the presence of muscarine receptors in parallel fibers in rat and rabbit, is that the lobular distribution of m2-containing parallel fibers, is the same as that of ChAT-positive mossy fiber rosettes (see above). This raises the possibility that muscarine m2 receptor are specifically expressed by those granule cells that are innervated by cholinergic mossy fibers. If this proves to be true, this would imply that there... 

Orci, L., Glick, B. S. and Rothman, J. E. A new type of coated vesicular carrier that appears not to contain clathrin its possible role in protein transport within the Golgi stack. Cell 46 171-184,1986. 

In neurons and non-neuronal cells, kinesin is associated with a variety of MBOs, ranging from synaptic vesicles to mitochondria to lysosomes. In addition to its role in fast axonal transport and related phenomena in non-neuronal cells, kinesin appears to be involved in constitutive cycling of membranes between the Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum. However, kinesin is not associated with all cellular membranes. For example, the nucleus, membranes of the Golgi complex and the plasma membrane all appear to lack kinesin. Kinesin interactions with membranes are thought to involve the light chains and carboxyl termini of heavy chains. However, neither this selectivity nor the molecular basis for binding of kinesin and other motors to membranes is well understood. 

In brown algae, phlorotannins are localized in specialized bodies called physodes (Ragan 1976). Shifting the experimental approach, from chemical assays of total phlorotannin concentration to microscopic methods that describe physode transport and establish the timeframes at which phlorotannins accumulate in response to abiotic or biotic stimuli, has provided new insight into the understanding of phlorotannin production and function. It is known that physodes are derived from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi of the cell (Schoenwaelder and Clayton 2000). It appears that physodes are transferred across the cytosol and incorporated into the cell wall, where the phlorotannins are assumed to have a structural role and thus be involved in primary metabolism (Schoenwaelder and Clayton 2000 Arnold and Targett 2003). 

---