General functions step control

In principle, any type of process model can be used to predict future values of the controlled outputs. For example, one can use a physical model based on first principles (e.g., mass and energy balances), a linear model (e.g., transfer function, step response model, or state space-model), or a nonlinear model (e.g., neural nets). Because most industrial applications of MPC have relied on linear dynamic models, later on we derive the MPC equations for a single-input/single-output (SISO) model. The SISO model, however, can be easily generalized to the MIMO models that are used in industrial applications (Lee et al., 1994). One model that can be used in MPC is called the step response model, which relates a single controlled variable y with a single manipulated variable u (based on previous changes in u) as follows ... 

Ve do not require any sophisticated mathematics to use these generalized functions such as the delta function. We introduce them here ibecause they make our work simpler, not more complicated. You will also find these functions useful in the process control course when you analyze the dynamics and feedback control of processes. Moreover, empirical tests, such as the step- and impulse-response experiments, provide a general method for modeling the dynamic behavior of many processes. Using these methods to determine a reactor RTD is just one small example of their uses in chemical process modeling. 

In the development of the process automation and control system, the required testing of that control system and the factory-assembled components, and the process simulation program must be established with the general functional specifications. In an API facility, many of the control systems perform process functions that require strict validation. The functional description for the automation system should require a complete factory acceptance test (FAT). This test should simulate the entire process and process failures and alarms. The FAT should also check and verify that the control system cabinets and controllers operate as designed. The factory acceptance testing of the process automation system prior to shipment and installation in the field is a critical step in the validation and start-up of the facility. 

In the manufacture of pure resorcinol resins, the reaction can be violently exothermic unless controlled by the addition of alcohols. Because the alcohols perform other useful functions in the glue mix, they are left in the liquid adhesive. PRF adhesives are generally prepared firstly by reaction of phenol with formaldehyde to form a PF resol polymer, that has been proved to be in the greatest percentage, and often completely, linear [95], In the reaction step that follows the resorcinol chemical is added in excess to the PF-resol to react it with the PF-resin -CH2OH groups to form PRF polymers in which the resorcinol groups can be resorcinol chemical or any type of resorcinol-formaldehyde polymer. 

As explained earfier step polymerisations generally occur by condensation reactions between functionally substituted monomers. In order to obtain high molar mass products bifuncfional reactants are used monofunctional compounds are used to control the reaction while trifunctional species may be included in order to give branched or crosslinked polymers. A number of types of reaction may be involved, as described briefly in the following paragraphs. 

Information generally flows from DNA to mRNA to protein, as illustrated in Figure 40-1 and discussed in more detail in Chapter 39. This is a rigidly controlled process involving a number of complex steps, each of which no doubt is regulated by one or more enzymes or factors faulty function at any of these steps can cause disease. 

In this section, we will derive the closed-loop transfer functions for a few simple cases. The scope is limited by how much sense we can make out of the algebra. Nevertheless, the steps that we go through are necessary to learn how to set up problems properly. The analysis also helps us to better understand why a system may have a faster response, why a system may become underdamped, and when there is an offset. When the algebra is clean enough, we can also make observations as to how controller settings may affect the closed-loop system response. The results generally reaffirm the qualitative statements that we ve made concerning the characteristics of different controllers. 

It can be synthesized with the MATLAB function feedback (). As an illustration, we will use a simple first order function for Gp and Gm, and a PI controller for Gc. When all is done, we test the dynamic response with a unit step change in the reference. To make the reading easier, we break the task up into steps. Generally, we would put the transfer function statements inside an M-file and define the values of the gains and time constants outside in the workspace. 

---