Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

General factors fitness

In order to use the correction factors in a generalized Newtonian code, the factors need to be functionalized using an empirical equation. A total of 160 numerical experiments were performed to determine the effect of the design parameters on the correction factors. A random sample of 95 numerical data points were used to evaluate the correction factor fitting function. The equation for the correction factors is as follows ... [Pg.291]

Initial screens can be distinguished between methods that are used to determine what factors are most important, and follow-up screens that allow optimization and improvement of crystal quality (Table 14.1). In experimental design, this is known as the Box-Wilson strategy (Box et al., 1978). The first group of screens is generally based on a so-called factorial plan which determines the polynomial coefficients of a function with k variables (factors) fitted to the response surface. It can be shown that the number of necessary experiments n increases with 2 if all interactions are taken into account. Instead of running an unrealistic, large number of initial experiments, the full factorial matrix can... [Pg.209]

Note that the phase factor fits the general pattern e i(py°GzZT with coherence order p = +2 and y0 = yh- For a homonuclear ZQC ... [Pg.459]

Jensen It seems to me, the next question to ask would be whether there is a general factor of overall fitness in some sense. There may be a general factor of biological fitness that is highly related to the psychometric factor. [Pg.146]

People vary in size, weight, strength, and physical condition. Physical condition includes general physical fitness, strength and conditioning of muscles, condition of joints, and other factors. Back muscles reacting to a lifted load compress the vertebrae of the spine. The intervertebral tissues have limits. Some studies have estimated the compressive load limits of spinal elements, but the capacity for an individual and particular spinal locations will vary. It is difficult to predict where and under what conditions an individual will experience pain, strain a muscle or experience some other form of injury. [Pg.197]

In general, a CMP model is built to capture some factors of a specific CMP process. Once the model parameters are extracted from experimental data, the model is cahbrated and ready to use in CMP process simulation. The general model fitting and apphcation methodology has four steps. [Pg.161]

Because mass flow bins have stable flow patterns that mimic the shape of the bin, permeabihty values can be used to calculate critical, steady-state discharge rates from mass flow hoppers. Permeabihty values can also be used to calculate the time required for fine powders to settle in bins and silos. In general, permeabihty is affected by particle size and shape, ie, permeabihty decreases as particle size decreases and the better the fit between individual particles, the lower the permeabihty moisture content, ie, as moisture content increases, many materials tend to agglomerate which increases permeabihty and temperature, ie, because the permeabihty factor, K, is inversely proportional to the viscosity of the air or gas in the void spaces, heating causes the gas to become more viscous, making the sohd less permeable. [Pg.555]

The stereoselectivity of organometallic additions with carbonyl compounds fits into the general pattern for nucleophilic attack discussed in Chapter 3. With 4-r-butylcyclohex-anone, there is a preference for equatorial approach but the selectivity is low. Enhanced steric factors promote stereoselective addition. [Pg.466]

It is worth considering hypothesis testing in general from the standpoint of the choice of models one has available to fit data. On the surface, it is clear that the more complex a model is (more fitting parameters) the greater the verisimilitude of the data to the calculated line (i.e., the smaller will be the differences between the real and predicted values). Therefore, the more complex the model the more likely it will accurately fit the data. However, there are other factors that must be considered. One is the physiological relevance... [Pg.233]

Data for other p-substituted benzene side-chain reactions are fitted by eq. (1) using the oj and Or values of Table I with widely varying precision measures. However, precision of fit comparable to that achieved for the eight basis set reactions of Table II is obtained (only) with recognizable analogs of the para BA type. Other reaction types are fitted generally with values of / SD/RMS greater by factors of two or more than the i>% level achieved by the para BA type (cf. subsequent Tables VII, IX, XII, XIV). [Pg.18]

Table IV lists comparative SD and / values for fittings of all of the reactions of Table II and III with each of the gr scales derived in this paper. The comparison includes figures for fittings with F and R values of Swain and Lupton (S L) and fitting with the Hammett equation. We believe the results given in Table IV provide a clear confirmation of the uniqueness and limited generality of the o/2(ba) scale. Very consistently, the fit achieved by the or (BA) scale is shown in Table IV to be superior by significant factors to that achieved by any of the other scales or by the simple op treatment. This fact is clearly reflected in the overall / values and the similarly weighted root-mean-square / values, F = y/lfnif lN, sum taken over all reactions. The value of F is. 067 for the basis sets of Table II (compare with overall / of. 058). The comparable F values are. 140 for Or, . 088 for S L, and. 155 for 0(p) with the data differences as explained in Table IV. For all sets of Table IV, the corresponding figures are. 073 for o (ba). -143 for a%, . 097 for S L, and. 209 for 0(py... Table IV lists comparative SD and / values for fittings of all of the reactions of Table II and III with each of the gr scales derived in this paper. The comparison includes figures for fittings with F and R values of Swain and Lupton (S L) and fitting with the Hammett equation. We believe the results given in Table IV provide a clear confirmation of the uniqueness and limited generality of the o/2(ba) scale. Very consistently, the fit achieved by the or (BA) scale is shown in Table IV to be superior by significant factors to that achieved by any of the other scales or by the simple op treatment. This fact is clearly reflected in the overall / values and the similarly weighted root-mean-square / values, F = y/lfnif lN, sum taken over all reactions. The value of F is. 067 for the basis sets of Table II (compare with overall / of. 058). The comparable F values are. 140 for Or, . 088 for S L, and. 155 for 0(p) with the data differences as explained in Table IV. For all sets of Table IV, the corresponding figures are. 073 for o (ba). -143 for a%, . 097 for S L, and. 209 for 0(py...
Table XIV lists comparative SD and /values for fittings of all the sets of Table Xlll with each of the scales of Table V, the FandR values of Swain, and with the single substituent parameter treatment, po y These statistics, coupled with structural considerations, we believe support the usefulness and uniqueness of a scale of limited generality. In general, the / values of Table XIV for the Or scale are smaller than those of the other scales by factors of from 2 to 10. The root-mean-square F values for the other scales are from 2.25 (< j (BA)) to 3 to 4 (S L,, cr (yv)) times that for. Because this analysis has demonstrated that Swain s F and R are generally inferior for the discriminating data for all four types, there appears little to encourage proliferation of these parameters. Table XIV lists comparative SD and /values for fittings of all the sets of Table Xlll with each of the scales of Table V, the FandR values of Swain, and with the single substituent parameter treatment, po y These statistics, coupled with structural considerations, we believe support the usefulness and uniqueness of a scale of limited generality. In general, the / values of Table XIV for the Or scale are smaller than those of the other scales by factors of from 2 to 10. The root-mean-square F values for the other scales are from 2.25 (< j (BA)) to 3 to 4 (S L,, cr (yv)) times that for. Because this analysis has demonstrated that Swain s F and R are generally inferior for the discriminating data for all four types, there appears little to encourage proliferation of these parameters.
Experimentally Uv may be obtained by fitting quantitatively the calculated X-ray beam intensities with the experimentally measured X-ray intensities using a general anisotropic temperature factor [42],... [Pg.165]

Stuer et al. [46] evaluated the presence of the 25 most used pharmaceuticals in the primary health sector in Denmark (e.g., paracetamol, acetyl salicylic acid, diazepam, and ibuprofen). They compared PECs with experimental determinations and they conclude that measured concentrations were in general within a factor of 2-5 of PECs. Carballa et al. [45] also determined PECs for pharmaceuticals (17), musk fragrances (2) and hormones (2) in sewage sludge matrix. For that purpose they used three different approaches (1) extrapolation of the per capita use in Europe to the number of Spanish inhabitants for musk fragrances (2) annual prescription items multiplied by the average daily dose for pharmaceuticals and (3) excretion rates of different groups of population for hormones. They indicated that these PECs fitted with the measured values for half of them (carbamazepine, diazepam, ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, sulfamethoxazole, roxithromycin, erythromycin, and 17a-ethiny I e strad iol). [Pg.37]


See other pages where General factors fitness is mentioned: [Pg.330]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.985]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.103]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.146 , Pg.262 ]




SEARCH



Fit factor

General factors

© 2024 chempedia.info