General alternative hypothesis

In attempting to reach decisions, it is useful to make assumptions or guesses about the populations involved. Such assumptions, which may or may not be true, are called statistical hypotheses and in general are statements about the probability distributions of the populations. A common procedure is to set up a null hypothesis, denoted by which states that there is no significant difference between two sets of data or that a variable exerts no significant effect. Any hypothesis which differs from a null hypothesis is called an alternative hypothesis, denoted by Tfj. 

McMahon I have a more general question about how the IGF system works. Your explanation for the absence of a tissue-specific effect of modulating IGF levels presupposes that there would be some data that suggest that IGF2 is acting locally. It is certainly expressed broadly throughout the whole embryo. An alternative hypothesis is that there are key places where it has been expressed during embryonic fetal development that are important and some places that are unimportant. What has been done in terms of tissue-specific removal or activation of this pathway ... 

Although the pathway of Eq. (1) is now based on much evidence (Section 111) and is unambiguous in the case of at least one bacterium [Pseudomonas stutzeri strain Zobell (f. sp. P. perfectomarina)], there have been alternative hypothesis. One hypothesis, advanced by the Hollocher group (Garber and Hollocher, 1981 St. John and Hollocher, 1977), considered NO as a likely intermediate, but one that remained at least partly enzyme-bound and was not entirely free to diffuse. This view was based on the outcome of certain kinetic and isotope experiments which can be summarized as follows. When denitrifying bacteria were challenged simultaneously with [ N]nitrite and ordinary NO, the cells reduced both compounds concomitantly to N2 (or to N2O in the presence of acetylene which is a specific inhibitor (Balderston et al., 1976 Yoshinari and Knowles, 1976) of nitrous oxide reductase). In the process, little NO was generally detected in the gas phase pool of NO and there was relatively little isotopically mixed N2O formed. That is, most of the N and N reduced to NjO appeared as N2O... 

BoNT inhibits this process, leading to mnscle weakness and paralysis. Cleavage of SNARE proteins appears to be sufficient to account for aU actions of the BoNT. The SNARE hypothesis has received near-universal acceptance since its introduction in the early 1990s an alternative hypothesis has been advanced based on results obtained in PC12 pheochromocytoma cells,however, its generality has not yet been established. 

Note that the critical level of the appropriate test statistic c generally be used as a normalized alternative to Xp, S(-, etc. The "detection limit" for a test statistic, however, is meaningless, as Xj, Sj, etc. refer to the true underlying quantity. A corollary Is that the term "detection limit" Is also without meaning In the absence of an alternative hypothesis. (This Is perhaps an obvious philosophical matter, but In principle, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, except by chance [a-error], if no alternative exists the 0-error Is then necessarily undefined. Of course an unexpected rejection can lead to an exciting search for the alternative.)... 

In general, the test of a hypothesis consists of five steps. First, the null hypothesis, Hq and alternative hypothesis, are defined. Second, a test statistic is chosen. Third, the significance level is specified. Fourth, a decision rule is set up, based on the significance level and the distribution of the test statistics. Finally, the test statistic from the sample is calculated and the decision on the decision rule is made. 

The first limitation is that NHST lacks a certain degree of direct applicability. The basic concept underlying the safety of an ingredient added to infant formulas is the reasonable certainty of no harm concept without a requirement for the demonstration of benefit. NHST, however, is generally formulated to demonstrate the superiority of one condition versus another. The fundamental idea in the formulation of reasonable certainty of no harm is one of equivalence, not of difference. While one can manipulate the null and alternative hypothesis in this circumstance (e.g., to make the no difference condition the alternative hypothesis), the resulting formulation is awkward and shifts the probabilistic control of the important error rate to that of power rather than to the more direct alpha level of the resulting test. Due to its highly unusual nature, it is likely that this test s results will not be properly understood and interpreted. 

Stating hypotheses (tentative explanations to causal questions) constitutes, in general, a complex process of combining empirical evidence, previous knowledge, and intuition (Lawson, 1995). The role of argument in this process seems to be crucial. Partial scientific claims towards an explanatory framework do need to be well grounded in warranting structures that are built on reliable epistemic criteria (Driver et al., 2000). Furthermore, the possible formulation of more than one alternative hypothesis for the same causal question, activates a process of comparative evaluation of their explanatory efficacy to decide which one is the... 

The only divergent opinion is that of Wenkert, who postulates that the harmala bases are derived directly from carbohydrate precursors by way of an anthranilate-erythrose-derived intermediate and not by way of tryptophan or tryptamine. This interesting alternative hypothesis, which is based almost entirely on structural arguments, was put forward as one aspect of a general carbohydrate hypothesis of alkaloid biogenesis. In a few cases where the alternative hypotheses are amenable to direct differential experimental test the carbohydrate hypothesis has not been substantiated. Whether or not it is applicable to the biogenesis of the harmala bases has not yet been investigated by biosynthetic experiment. 

---