Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Gases pressure effects

The leading correction to the classical ideal gas pressure temi due to quantum statistics is proportional to 1 and to n. The correction at constant density is larger in magnitude at lower temperatures and lighter mass. The coefficient of can be viewed as an effective second virial coefficient The effect of quantum... [Pg.429]

In the laboratory, it has been found that similar effects can be produced if a voltage is applied between two electrodes immersed in a gas. The nature of the laboratory or instrumental discharge depends critically on the type of gas used, the gas pressure, and the magnitude of the applied voltage. The actual electrical and gas pressure conditions determine whether or not the discharge is called a corona, a plasma, or an arc. [Pg.29]

Fig. 7. Structural 2ones in condensates showing the effect of gas pressure. To convert MPa to psi, multiply by 145. See text. Fig. 7. Structural 2ones in condensates showing the effect of gas pressure. To convert MPa to psi, multiply by 145. See text.
J ct Spra.y, The mechanism that controls the breakup of a Hquid jet has been analy2ed by many researchers (22,23). These studies indicate that Hquid jet atomisation can be attributed to various effects such as Hquid—gas aerodynamic interaction, gas- and Hquid-phase turbulence, capillary pinching, gas pressure fluctuation, and disturbances initiated inside the atomiser. In spite of different theories and experimental observations, there is agreement that capillary pinching is the dominant mechanism for low velocity jets. As jet velocity increases, there is some uncertainty as to which effect is most important in causing breakup. [Pg.330]

C. R. Bennet, R. S. Ring, and P. J. Petersen, Pressure Effects on Macromolecular—Water Interactions with Synthetic Membranes, ACS 181st National Meeting, Atlanta, Ga., Mar. 1981. [Pg.304]

For the liquid-phase mass-transfer coefficient /cl, the effects of total system pressure can be ignored for all practical purposes. Thus, when using Kq and /cl for the design of gas absorbers or strippers, the primary pressure effects to consider will be those which affect the equilibrium curves and the values of m. If the pressure changes affect the hydrodynamics, then Icq, and a can all change significantly. [Pg.610]

Powder Insulation A method of reahzing some of the benefits of multiple floating shields without incurring the difficulties of awkward structural complexities is to use evacuated powder insulation. The penalty incurred in the use of this type of insulation, however, is a tenfold reduction in the overall thermal effectiveness of the insulation system over that obtained for multilayer insulation. In applications where this is not a serious factor, such as LNG storage facihties, and investment cost is of major concern, even unevacuated powder-insulation systems have found useful apphcations. The variation in apparent mean thermal conductivity of several powders as a function of interstitial gas pressure is shown in the familiar S-shaped curves of Fig. 11-121. ... [Pg.1135]

On the other hand, when evolved vapor is purged from the dryer environment by using a second (inert) gas, the temperature at which vaporization occurs will depend on the concentration of vapor in the surrounding gas. In effect, the liquid must be heated to a temperature at which its vapor pressure equ s or exceeds the partial pressure of vapor in the purge gas. In the reverse situation, condensation will occur. [Pg.1175]

The ambiguity of the total pressure effect can be seen by a comparison of the gas-phase- and liquid-phase-controlled cases when the gas phase controls, the liquid-phase resistance is negligible and Kg( = K npf is independent of the total pressure. For this case the coefficient K g< is inversely proportional to the total system pressure as shown in Eq. (14-66). On the other hand, when the liquid phase controls, the correct equation is... [Pg.1364]

Bond [Min. Eng. (London), 60(1), 63-64 (1968)] reviewed attempts to induce breakage without wastefuUy applying pressure and concluded that inherent practical limitations have been found for the following methods spinning particles, resonant vibration, electro-hydrauhe crushing, induction heating, sudden release of gas pressure, and chisel-effect breakers. For a review of more recent efforts, see edition 6 of this handbook. [Pg.1866]

Further chapters cover in detail the characteristics and applications of galvanic anodes and of cathodic protection rectifiers, including specialized instruments for stray current protection and impressed current anodes. The fields of application discussed are buried pipelines storage tanks tank farms telephone, power and gas-pressurized cables ships harbor installations and the internal protection of water tanks and industrial plants. A separate chapter deals with the problems of high-tension effects on pipelines and cables. A study of costs and economic factors concludes the discussion. The appendix contains those tables and mathematical derivations which appeared appropriate for practical purposes and for rounding off the subject. [Pg.583]

Inert gas pressure, temperature, and conversion were selected as these are the critical variables that disclose the nature of the basic rate controlling process. The effect of temperature gives an estimate for the energy of activation. For a catalytic process, this is expected to be about 90 to 100 kJ/mol or 20-25 kcal/mol. It is higher for higher temperature processes, so a better estimate is that of the Arrhenius number, y = E/RT which is about 20. If it is more, a homogeneous reaction can interfere. If it is significantly less, pore diffusion can interact. [Pg.110]

Inert gas pressure does not have any effect on the surface catalysis controlling the rate. If diffusion is slowing down the rate, high inert gas pressure will cut the diffusion coefficient and the rate will be less than at low Pi. If both this and a low energy of activation is are observed, a difflisional effect is very likely. [Pg.110]

Figure 6.3.2 shows the feed-forward design, in which acrolein and water were included, since previous studies had indicated some inhibition of the catalytic rates by these two substances. Inert gas pressure was kept as a variable to check for pore diffusion limitations. Since no large diffusional limitation was shown, the inert gas pressure was dropped as an independent variable in the second study of feed-back design, and replaced by total pressure. For smaller difftisional effects later tests were recommended, due to the extreme urgency of this project. [Pg.128]


See other pages where Gases pressure effects is mentioned: [Pg.19]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.1487]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.708]    [Pg.1443]    [Pg.1594]    [Pg.1595]    [Pg.2004]    [Pg.2045]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.124]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.68 ]




SEARCH



Effect of Gas Pressure on Discharge

Effect of liquid pressure on gas fugacity

Pressure Effects in Gas-Phase Reactions

Pressure real gases, effect

Stability Maps Pressure, Gas-phase Chemistry and Fuel Transport Properties Effects

The Effect of an Inert Gas on Vapor Pressure

Warm pressurant gas effects

© 2024 chempedia.info