Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Gas pressure loops

Varying the flow of a compressible fluid controls the pressure in a large volume. This process is dominated by a single large capacitance with no dead time. The measurement is normally noise free and, owing to its capacitive nature, is characterized by a slow response and a small process gain. As shown for liquid level control, a proportional controller is more than adequate for gas pressure control. [Pg.162]

The gas pressure loop is perhaps the easiest type of process loop to control. Owing to the low gain in the process, a high controller gain will result in good control with very little offset and very little possibility of instability. It is perhaps the only loop in the fluid processing industry that is very close to being unconditionally stable. As with the level control loop, a valve positioner can be used to improve loop response for a valve with hysteresis. [Pg.162]


The characteristics of the gas pressure loop are almost the same as that of a liquid level control loop. A typical gas pressure loop is shown schematically in Figure 7.20. [Pg.162]

Typically, a PID controller is used, but using a proportional-only controller may stabilize tbe reactor provided that tbe reactor is the dominant single capacitance in the loop and there is no appreciable dead time (similar to a gas pressure loop). [Pg.169]

In a process loop with a pneumatic controller and a large process time constant. Here the process time constant is dominant, and the positioner will improve the linearitv of the final control element, Some common processes with large time constants that benefit from positioner application are liquid level, temperature, large volume gas pressure, and mixing,... [Pg.785]

As shown in Fig. 1.9 sample transfer in the DC 180 is facilitated by gas pressure. Once the pick-up loop is filled a gas chase delivers the sample... [Pg.85]

More generally, co is independent of the external gas pressure k is the Boltzmann constant (1.38 x 10 erg deg ) and T is the temperature in Kelvin. Furthermore, the equilibrium between co and a collapsed CS plane fault is maintained by exchange at dislocations bounding the CS planes. Clearly, this equilibrium cannot be maintained except by the nucleation of a dislocation loop and such a process requires a supersaturation of vacancies and CS planes eliminate supersaturation of anion vacancies (Gai 1981, Gai et al 1982). Thus we introduce the concept of supersaturation of oxygen point defects in the reacting catalytic oxides, which contributes to the driving force for the nucleation of CS planes. From thermodynamics. [Pg.96]

Even with this gas-pressure tuning interferometer, the drift of t during a long-time measurement is unavoidable. In addition to the mechanical stability of the interferometer, a feedback loop control of t is necessary for such a long-time... [Pg.288]

The interferometric structure around the quarter revival timing discussed above is generated spontaneously by the intrinsic anharmonicity of the potential. Next we will show similar interferometric structures generated by the double-pulse excitation [39]. The pump and control pulses are generated by the gas-pressure tuning interferometer. The double-pulse delay t was stabilized by the feedback loop control. [Pg.291]

Fig. 9.6. Schematic representation of die BEST system (Brnker Biospin see also [21]). 1, Bottle with transport liquid 2, dilutor 402 single syringe (5mL) with 1100 iL tube 3, dilutor 402 3-way valve 4, sample loop (250-500 pL) 5, 6-way valve (standard version) loading sample 6, 6-way valve (standard version) injecting sample 7, injection port 8, XYZ needle 9, rack for sample vials 10, rack for recovering vials 11, rack for washing fluids and waste bottle (3 glass bottles) 12, external waste bottle 13, flow probe with inner lock container 14, inert gas pressure canister for drying process. Fig. 9.6. Schematic representation of die BEST system (Brnker Biospin see also [21]). 1, Bottle with transport liquid 2, dilutor 402 single syringe (5mL) with 1100 iL tube 3, dilutor 402 3-way valve 4, sample loop (250-500 pL) 5, 6-way valve (standard version) loading sample 6, 6-way valve (standard version) injecting sample 7, injection port 8, XYZ needle 9, rack for sample vials 10, rack for recovering vials 11, rack for washing fluids and waste bottle (3 glass bottles) 12, external waste bottle 13, flow probe with inner lock container 14, inert gas pressure canister for drying process.
A primary compressor increases the pressure of the entering ethylene gas (and propylene gas, which is added as a molecular weight control agent) from between 5 and 15 bar to about 250 bar. The secondary compressor further increases the gas pressure from 250 bar to the desired reactor pressure (approximately 2500 bar). An initiator is added to the gas as it enters the reactor. The reactor is operated to ensure a per-pass conversion of 15%-35% and is a wall-cooled reactor where the cooling water can be used to produce steam. The reaction mixture then enters the HP separator (-250 bar), where the mixture is flashed to produce two distinct phases a PE-rich melt phase and an ethylene-rich gas phase. The separated gas then enters the recycle loop. The ethylene gas is cooled before entering the secondary compressor. The PE enters the low-pressure separator. This low-pressure separator, also referred to as a hopper, performs the final degassing step. The separated ethylene gas is cooled and some components are removed. This step takes place... [Pg.166]

From a practical point of view, one of the most challenging applications to date has been in the experimental fluidised bed shown in Figure 3, which is a scaled-down version of a polyethylene production unit, of overall height approximately 2 m, with a conical expansion section 1 m above the distributor the diameter of the lower section is 0.154 m. The bed is constructed of 316 stainless steel and is placed within a gas circulation loop allowing operation at pressures up to 20 bars. [Pg.156]

In the case of fast loops (fast flow, liquid pressure, small-volume gas pressure), positioners are likely to degrade loop response and cause limit cycling, because the positioner (a cascade slave) is not faster than the speed at which its set point (the control signal) can change. A controlled process is considered "fast" if its period of oscillation is less than three times that of the positioned valve. [Pg.219]

Once we have fixed a flow in each recycle loop, we then determine what valve should be used to control each inventory variable. This is the material balance step in the Buckley procedure. Inventories include all liquid levels (except for surge volume in certain liquid recycle streams) and gas pressures. An inventory variable should typically be controlled with the manipulated variable that has the largest effect on it within that unit (Richardson rule). Because we have fixed a flow in each recycle loop, our choice of available valves has been reduced for inventory control in some units. Sometimes this actually eliminates the obvious choice for inventory control for that unit. This constraint forces us to look outside the immediate vicinity of the holdup we are considering. [Pg.64]

Step 7. Methane is purged from the gas recycle loop to prevent it from accumulating, and its composition can be controlled with purge flow. Diphenyl is removed in the bottoms stream from the recycle column, where steam flow controls base level. Here we control composition (or temperature with the bottoms flow. The inventory of benzene is accounted for via temperature and overhead receiver level control in the product column. Toluene inventory is accounted for via level control in the recycle column overhead receiver. Purge flow and gas-loop pressure control account for hydrogen inventory. [Pg.302]

Step 6. Two pressures must be controlled in the column and in the gas loop. The most direct handle to control column pressure is by manipulating the vent stream from the decanter. We have three choices to control gas loop pressure purge flow, flow to the CO> removal system, and the fresh ethylene feed flow since fresh oxygen flow has been previously selected. Both the purge flow and the flow to the C02 removal system are small relative to the gas recycle flowrate. Any changes in either one would not have a large effect on gas loop pressure. Since ethylene composes a substantia] part of the gas recycle stream, pressure is a good indication of the ethylene inventory. So we choose the fresh ethylene feed flow to control gas recycle loop pressure. [Pg.333]

Synetix Methanol (LCM) Natural gas, refinery offgas Heat-exchange reforming and low-pressure loop technology give high efficiencies 1 1996... [Pg.137]

The synthesis loop boiler on the exit of the converter is also a very important piece of equipment. In some modern plants not equipped with an auxiliary boiler it supplies nearly half of the total steam generation. It may generate as much as 1.5 t of steam per tonne of ammonia, equivalent to about 90% of the reaction heat. Fire-tube versions have been also used, including Babcock-Borsig s thin-tubesheet design. But compared to the secondary reformer service, where the gas pressure is lower than the steam pressure, the conditions and stress patterns are different. In the synthesis loop boiler the opposite is the case, with the result that the tubes are subjected to longitudinal compression instead of being under tension. Several failures in this application have been reported [993], and there was some discussion of whether this type of boiler is the best solution for the synthesis loop waste-heat duty. [Pg.173]

The principle of experimental semp is presented in Figure 7.5. In addition to a loading stage, it mainly consists of a gas-pressurized cross-flow hltration circulation loop where the membrane allows the separation of the feed in two streams the permeate and the retentate. Each stream is further separated into gas and liquid parts in the separation stage. Membranes are inorganic to ensure hard-operating conditions without failure. [Pg.188]

Precautions against explosions caused by dust or solvents are often a difficult task. Figure 153.1 describes three possible solutions. They include an inert gas closed loop (Figure 153.1(a)), design of the vessel to withstand the maximum (e.g. 7 bar) expected pressure (Figure 153.1(b)), or design of the vessel for increased pressure (e.g. 2 bar) and explosion vents (Figure 153.1c). [Pg.197]

Here, Poj ig and Pij g are the refrigerant pressure at the inlet and the exit, respectively, of each turbo-expander in the natural gas relfigerafion loop. [Pg.258]


See other pages where Gas pressure loops is mentioned: [Pg.162]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.9]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.162 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info