Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

G, phase

By virtue of their simple stnicture, some properties of continuum models can be solved analytically in a mean field approxunation. The phase behaviour interfacial properties and the wetting properties have been explored. The effect of fluctuations is hrvestigated in Monte Carlo simulations as well as non-equilibrium phenomena (e.g., phase separation kinetics). Extensions of this one-order-parameter model are described in the review by Gompper and Schick [76]. A very interesting feature of tiiese models is that effective quantities of the interface—like the interfacial tension and the bending moduli—can be expressed as a fiinctional of the order parameter profiles across an interface [78]. These quantities can then be used as input for an even more coarse-grained description. [Pg.2381]

Supported ionic Organic liquid (g) Phase separation 21... [Pg.264]

Other = any submission that does not fit in one of the other categories (e.g., Phase IV response). If this box is checked the type of submission can be explained in the REASON FOR SUBMISSION block. [Pg.117]

FIGURE 11.12 Interaction energy density versus 4-methyl styrene content. (From Raboney, M., Gamer, R.T., Elspass, C.W., and Peiffer, D.G., Phase Behavior of Brominated Poly(Isobutylene-co-4-Methylstyrene)/ General Purpose Rubber Blends. Rubber Division, Proceedings of the American Chemical Society, Nashville, TN, Sept. 29-Oct. 2, 1998, Paper No. 36.)... [Pg.317]

Note that the transfer rate equation is based on an overall concentration driving force, (X-X ) and overall mass transfer coefficient, Kl. The two-film theory for interfacial mass transfer shows that the overall mass transfer coefficient, Kl, based on the L-phase is related to the individual film coefficients for the L and G-phase films, kL and ko, respectively by the relationship... [Pg.168]

A countercurrent extraction cascade with reaction A + B C was considered by Ingham and Dunn (1974), as shown in Fig. 3.40. The reaction takes place between a solute A in the L-phase, which is transferred to the G-phase by the process of mass transfer, where it then reacts with a second component, B, also in the G-phase, to form an inert product, C. [Pg.179]

Figure 3.40. Solute A is transferred from the L-phase to the G-phase, where it reacts with a component B, to form C. Figure 3.40. Solute A is transferred from the L-phase to the G-phase, where it reacts with a component B, to form C.
Roovers, K. and Assoian, R. K., Integrating the MAP kinase signal into the G, phase cell cycle machinery, Bioessays, 22, 818-826, 2000. [Pg.268]

Lathrop, B.K., Thomas, K. and Glaser, L. (1985) Control of myogenic differentiation by fibroblast growth factor is mediated by position of the G phase of the cell cycle. Journal of Cell Biology 101, 2194-2198. [Pg.143]

For nearly symmetric compositions the unlike blocks form domains composed of alternating layers, known as lamellar phase (L). Slightly off-symmetry composition results in the formation of a different layered structure. The structure is known as perforated layers (PI) or catenoid phase. Despite an earlier assignment as an equilibrium phase, it is now known to be in a long-lived metastable state that facilitates the transition from I to G phases [9-14], The PL structure consists of alternating minority and majority component layers in which hexagonally packed channels of the majority component extend through the minority component. [Pg.142]

The G phase is a complex phase possessing a bicontinuous structure which is located in or close to the compositional range of the PL phase. The minority component forms two interpenetrating threefold coordinated networks [10]. [Pg.142]

Phase transitions of the PS-fo-PI system have been extensively studied. The morphological transition from the I phase to the G phase proceeds through nucleation and growth. The difference in the geometrical characteristics of these two phases induces considerable local distortion of both morphologies... [Pg.193]

However, a PS-fo-PI/PI blend shows direct L G transitions without appearance of the PL phase. The L microdomain is more favourable than the PL phase since the volume fraction of the PI block component and the symmetry of microdomains is increased by the addition of PI homopolymer. Hence, the PL phase may not be formed as an intermediate structure if relatively high molecular weight PI homopolymer is added. The latter is not able to effectively fill the corners of the Wigner-Seitz cells in consequence packing frustration cannot be released and the PL phase is not favoured [152]. In contrast, the addition of low molecular weight PI homopolymer to the minor component of the PL phase reduces the packing frustration imposed on the block copolymers and stabilizes it [153]. Hence, transition from the PL to the G phase indicates an epitaxial relationship between the two structures, while the direct transition between L and G yields a polydomain structure indicative of epitaxial mismatches in domain orientations [152]. [Pg.194]

In binary mixtures of water, surfactants, or lipids the most common structure is the gyroid one, G, existing usually on the phase diagram between the hexagonal and lamellar mesophases. This structure has been observed in a very large number of surfactant systems [13-16,24—27] and in the computer simulations of surfactant systems [28], The G phase is found at rather high surfactant concentrations, usually much above 50% by weight. [Pg.147]

The ionic liquid investment could be further reduced if future research enables the application of ammonium based alkylsulfate or arylsulfonate ionic liquids. For these systems bulk prices around 15 /kg are expected. Ammonium based alkylsulfate or arylsulfonate ionic liquids usually show melting points slightly above room temperature but clearly below the operating temperature of the hydroformylation reaction. Therefore these systems may be less suitable for the liquid-liquid biphasic process in which the ionic liquid may be involved in process steps at ambient temperature (e.g. phase separation or liquid storage). In contrast, for the SILP catalyst a room temperature ionic liquid is not necessarily required as long as the film becomes a liquid under the reaction conditions. Assuming an ammonium based SILP catalyst, the capital investment for the ionic liquid for the industrial SILP catalyst would add up to 105,000 . [Pg.209]


See other pages where G, phase is mentioned: [Pg.2363]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.2065]    [Pg.2549]    [Pg.727]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.648]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.719]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.778]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.47]   


SEARCH



G Vapor Phase

Luminous Gas Phase (Deposition G)

Smectic G phase

Structures of the Crystal J and G Phases

Three-phase Catalytic Reactions (G-L-S)

Variation of G with T for Solid, Liquid and Gaseous Phase

© 2024 chempedia.info