Functional Monolithic Supports

For example, our group developed a ROMP-based synthesis for these types of materials [68-74, 92-99] and described the use of these supports in heterogeneous catalysis [45, 98]. Since that time, numerous reviews have expounded the twenty-first century advancements in monolithic supports for separation science, heterogeneous catalysis, and tissue engineering [1, 100-114]. The published research from 2012 also includes the development of large-volume monolithic supports for biomolecule chromatography [115], boronate affinity chromatography columns [116], and monolith-supported Pt-based nanoparticles for hydrosilylation reactions [74]. 

---

Scheme 11.8 Loading of the functional monolithic supports with Pd-based nanoparticles.

Tab. 8.5 Functional monomers used for surface-grafting of monolithic supports.

This work describes a new type of monolithic support offering a highly interconnected permanent porosity possessing pendant double bond. This support may provide a better accessibility to active sites and allows the use of a wider range of solvents than classical gel type beads prepared by suspension polymerisation. The free radical addition of functional thiols led to the production of functional supports (acid, ester, alcohol, amine, thiol...). 

The preparation of polymeric monoliths is relatively simple compared with those of the silica rods. A polymerization mixture consisting of monomer, cross-linker, initiator, and porogenic solvent is introduced into a sealed tube. The reaction can be temperature or redox initiated and in the case of transparent molds UV light can also be used to trigger the polymerization. At the end of the reaction the seals are removed and the tubes are attached to a pump, which flushes solvent through the monolith to remove the porogens and the unreacted components. The obtained monolith can be radial or axial compressed to prevent the formation of voids and further functionalized for different chromatographic modes. The majority of current monolithic supports... 

Table 11. Typical value of the key catalyst reaction conditions as a function of the design parameters of the monolithic support for operating conditions relative to a monolith with 62 cells per square centimeter and wall thickness 0.17 mm.

Noble metal catalysts are highly active for the oxidation of carbon monoxide and therefore widely used in the control of automobile emissions. Numerous recent studies on noble metal-based three-way catalysts have revealed characteristics of good thermal stability and poison resistance(l). Incorporation of rare earth oxides as an additive in automotive catalysts has improved the dispersion and stability of precious metals present in the catalyst as active components(2). Monolith-supported noble-metal catalysts have also been developed(3). However, the disadvantages of noble metal catalysts such as relative scarcity, high cost and requirement of strict air/fuel ratio in three-way function have prompted attention to be focused on the development of non-noble metal alternatives. 

The selection of the carrier is relatively simple. It may be imposed by the type of reaction to be promoted. For instance, if the latter requires a bifunctional catalyst (metal + acid functions), acidic supports such as silica-aluminas, zeolites, or chlorinated aluminas, will be used. On the other hand, if the reaction occurs only on the metal, a more inert support such as silica will be used. In certain cases, other requirements (shock resistance, thermal conductivity, crush resistance, and flow characteristics) may dominate and structural supports (monoliths) have to be used. For the purpose of obtaining small metal particles, the use of zeolites has turned out to be an effective means to control their size. However, the problem of accessibility and acidity appearing on reduction may mask the evidence of the effect of metal particle size on the catalytic properties. 

Figure 7.9 Variation of bacteria coverage density (number of cells per iOO square pm) as a function of distance from the micro-reactor inlet. The intercept of the dashed line indicates the optimum thickness of the micro-reactor monolithic support...

The latest addition to the family of oligonucleotide separators is the DNA-Swift SAX-IS, which combines a pressure and chemically stable monolithic support coated with functionalized nanobeads. These nanobeads with quaternary ammonium functional groups, optimized for oligonucleotide separations, are similar to those of the DNAPac columns and contribute to the column s high... 

The column itself can be produced as a single open channel or as a branched system of channels starting from one microchannel and ending in another microchannel. The latter type is often named as COMOSS (collocated monolith support structure). With some of the materials mentioned, the channels can serve as stationary phase itself or can be functionalized by coating, packing, or incolumn polymerization with appropriate chromatographic phases. 

---