Fluorescence signal/noise level

In the early years of flame photometry, only relatively cool flames were used. We shall see below that only a small fraction of atoms of most elements is excited by flames and that the fraction excited increases as the temperature is increased. Consequently, relatively few elements have been determined routinely by flame emission spectrometry, especMly j ew of those that emit line spectra (several can exist in flames as molecular species, particularly as oxides, which emit molecular band spectra). Only the easily excited alkali metals sodium, potassium, and lithium are routinely deterniined by flame emission spectrometry in the clinical laboratory. However, with flames such as oxyacetylene and nitrous oxide-acetylene, over 60 elements can now be determined by flame emission spectrometry. This is in spite of the fact that a small fraction of excited atoms is available for emission. Good sensitivity is achieved because, as with fluorescence (Chapter 16), we are, in principle, measuring the difference between zero and a small but finite signal, and so the sensitivity is limited by the response and stability of the detector and the stability (noise level) of the flame aspiration system. 

The amplitude of Ffjiax changes was within the noise level of the fluorescence signal. 

In classical fluorescence spectroscopy, in contrast to the SIFT method, the entire sample is exposed to the light beam and the fluorescence intensity, which results from the sum of the signals received from the preparation, is measured within a particular time-frame. Here, scattered and reflected light photons create the so-called background noise, which tends to drown out fluorescence signals from the small amounts of molecules to be detected. Therefore, with this method only amounts above the nanomolar level can be detected. 

Most mass spectrometers suffer from white noise (Johnson noise and shot noise), RF interference (i.e., radio stations, fluorescent light ballast supplies, switching power supplies, quadrupoles, etc.), and chemical noise (chemical interference peaks). Generally, the noise level reported for signal/noise calculations should be reported as root-mean-square (RMS) of the white noise, but this value can sometimes be difficult to determine if the experiment has much chemical noise. RF noise is not usually dense enough to be a major problem. Regardless, if SNR values are reported, it is important to report exactly how noise is calculated. 

Surface plasmon fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy are very young techniques. However, the results obtained so far are very promising and hold great potential both for fundamental studies as well as for practical applications, e.g., in sensor development. The obtainable signal-to-noise levels, as well as, the documented lower limit of detection are very encouraging. 

Besides LIF resonant, two-photon ionization (Sect.6.3) can also be used for the sensitive detection of collision-induced rotational transitions. This method represents an efficient alternative to LIF for such electronic states which do not emit detectable fluorescence because there are no allowed optical transitions into lower states. An illustrative example is the detailed investigation of inelastic collisions between excited Ng molecules and different collision partners [13.33]. A vibration-rotation level (v, T) in the a IIg state of N2 is selectively populated by two-photon absorption (Fig. 13.10). The collision-induced transitions to other levels (v +Av,j +AJ) are monitored by resonant two-photon ionization (REMPI, Sect.6.2) with a pulsed dye laser. The achievable good signal/noise ratio is demonstrated by the collisional satellite spectrum in Fig. 13.10b, where the optically pumped level was (v =2, J =7). This level is ionized by the P(7) parent line in the spectrum, which has the signal heights 7.2 on the scale of Fig. 13.10b. 

---