Fluid simulations

Jorgensen W L, J M Briggs and M L Contreras 1990. Relative Partition Coefficients for Organic Solute from Fluid Simulations. Journal of Physical Chemistry 94 1683-1986. 

M. Ripoll, K. Mussawisade, R. G. Winkler, and G. Gompper, Dynamic regimes of fluids simulated by multiparticle-collision dynamics, Phys. Rev. E 72, 016701 (2005). 

Jorgensen, W. L. Briggs, J. M. Contreras, M. L., Relative partition coefficients for organic solutes from fluid simulations, J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 1683-1686. 

Liu, J., Luijten, E. Generalized geometric cluster algorithm for fluid simulation. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 2005, 71, 066701. 

Equation (3.52) provides a route for evaluating the finite-wavevector permittivity components from MD simulation. The values of k accessible in simulation are discrete and depend on the size and shape of the simulation cell. For example, for the cubic geometry typically used in fluid simulations [55,56],... 

The development of preparative chromatographic processes in fine chemistry and in pharmaceutical industries is a very important field of research. This new process called SF-SMB (Supercritical Fluid Simulated Moving Bed) is a attempt to optimize preparative chromatography by three ways the choice of a supercritical C02 as eluent, the implementation of the simulated moving bed, and the use of an elution strength modulation in the process, performing a pressure gradient. 

Vaginal Fluid Simulant Synthetic Cervical Mucus... 

Nieuwland etal. (1995) studied bubble formation at a single orifice in a 2D gas fluidized bed operated at elevated pressure and found very good agreement between theory (two-fluid simulations) and experiment. Similar results were ob-... 

Two-fluid simulations have also been performed to predict void profiles (Kuipers et al, 1992b) and local wall-to-bed heat transfer coefficients in gas fluidized beds (Kuipers et al., 1992c). In Fig. 18 a comparison is shown between experimental (a) and theoretical (b) time-averaged porosity distributions obtained for a 2D air fluidized bed with a central jet (air injection velocity through the orifice 10.0 m/s which corresponds to 40u ). The experimental porosity distributions were obtained with the aid of a nonintrusive light transmission technique where the principles of liquid-solid fluidization and vibrofluidization were employed to perform the necessary calibration. The principal differences between theory and experiment can be attributed to the simplified solids rheology assumed in the hydrodynamic model and to asymmetries present in the experiment. 

---