Energy fission

Uranium dioxide fuel is irradiated in a reactor for periods of one to two years to produce fission energy. Upon removal, the used or spent fuel contains a large inventory of fission products. These are largely contained in the oxide matrix and the sealed fuel tubing. 

An increase in energy supplies would obviously relieve the pressures. While major additional contributions might come from renewable energy or fusion, it would be impmdent to count on them. Therefore, to avoid a tremendous gamble on the economic and social future of the world, it is important to lay the foundation for a substantial expansion in the use of fission energy. 

In what way and how much do the military origins and uses of fission energy impact the prospects for revival ofthe nuclear power option Are they a serious impediment are they of little significance or is it just possible that, if fully understood, the military implications are a positive factor No assessment of the future of nuclear power can be complete without consideration ofthe military use issue, the essence of which is the potential spread of nuclear weapons to additional countries or even subnational entities. This paper reviews this issue, giving particular attention to international nuclear safeguards, certainly the most distinctive, and probably the most misunderstood feature of the nuclear nonproliferation regime. 

The production of electricity fiom nuclear fission energy is accompanied by formation of radioactive waste, of which the larger hazard is the presence of long-lived transuranium isotopes. The problems associated with this waste are still debated, but if the transuranium isotopes could be removed by exhaustive reprocessing and transmuted in special nuclear devices, the hazard of the waste would be drastically reduced (Chapter 12). This may require new selective extractants and diluents as well as new process schemes. Research in this field is very active. 

Ordinary hydrogen is sometimes called a perfect fuel, because of its almost unlimited supply on Earth, and when it burns, harmless water is the product of the combustion. So why don t we abandon fission energy and fusion energy, not to mention fossil fuel energy, and just use hydrogen ... 

Nuclear fission energy for the commercial production of electricity has been with us since the 1950s. In the United States, about 20 percent of all electrical energy now originates from 103 nuclear fission reactors situated throughout the country. Other countries also depend on nuclear fission energy, as is shown in Figure 19.13. Worldwide, there are about 442 nuclear reactors in operation and 29 currently under construction. 

Countries turning to nuclear fission energy have decreased their dependence on fossil fuels and have diminished their output of carbon dioxide, sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, heavy metals, airborne particulates, and other pollutants. Money that would have been spent on foreign oil payments has been saved. It is estimated, for example, that nuclear fission energy has saved the United States 150 billion in foreign oil payments. 

In the United States, however, the public perception of nuclear energy is less than favorable. There are formidable disadvantages, including the creation of radioactive wastes and the possibility of an accident that releases radioactive substances into the environment. In rebuttal, advocates point out that we cannot insist that nuclear fission energy be absolutely safe while at the same time accept tanker spills, global warming, acid rain, and coal-miner diseases. 

According to the German Bundestag s decision, within 20 years there will be no more fission energy production. 

D. We will still be using fossil fuels, oil, gas and coal, but their usage will be curtailed because there will have been a dramatic increase of harnessing of solar energy, wind energy, fusion and fission energy, and other sources. We propose that fusion reactors may become the usable energy source of choice, because of minimum problems of disposal and because of uses of the fissionable products (tritium). These are less of a security risk than fission products (which are plutonium and uranium). 

Nuclear fission energy was considered by the committee, but not nuclear fusion, since the DOE projects commercialization of fusion in about 2050 (DOE, 2003g), which is beyond the time frame considered in this analysis. 

L. Koch, Radioactivity and Fission Energy, Radiochim. Acta 70/71, 397 (1995)... 

Plutonium— A man-made element that is created from uranium-238 by neutron bombardment and can be used as a material for fission energy. Radioactive waste—The radioactive fragments produced by fission, which accumulate in the fuel rods of a nuclear reactor and eventually must be removed. 

Arranging for the imcontrolled, large-scale release of energy produced during nuclear fission is a relatively simple tadc. Fission (atomic) bombs are essentially devices in which a chain reaction is initiated and then allowed to continue c i its own. The problems of designing a stem by which fission energy is released at a constant and useable rate, however, are much more difficult... 

This was the first man-made radionuclide. From that time on many species of radionuclides were produced by bombardment of elements with charged particles using the various types of accelerators. In addition, practical use of fission energy allowed production of a great amount of artificial radionuclides, not only by neutron irradiation generated with nuclear reactors, but also by processing spent fuel. 

In all, 193 experiences nucleaires (nuclear tests and safety trials) were conducted at the French nuclear weapon test site at Mururoa and Fangataufa atolls. Of these, 178 were nuclear tests , in which a nuclear device was exploded with a large release of fission and, in some cases, fusion energy and 15 were safety trials in which more or less fully developed nuclear devices were subjected to simulated accident conditions and the nuclear weapon cores were destroyed by means of conventional explosives, with no or—on a few occasions—very small releases of fission energy. 

Safety trials were conducted to investigate the behaviour of the core of a nuclear device under simulated faulty detonation conditions. The core is destroyed by the conventional explosive detonation of such a device, with the production of finely divided plutonium and plutonium oxide which are widely dispersed if the test is not confined. Usually no fission takes place, though there was a very small fission energy release in three of the French underground safety trials. (Since there was some explosive yield, these three trials are sometimes counted as nuclear tests which would put the total number of underground nuclear tests at Mururoa and Fangataufa atolls at 140 rather than 137.) All of the 15 safety trials were carried out at Mururoa. 

It was three of the safety trials that took place in the carbonate rock that had small releases of fission energy associated with them. 

---