Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Lattice systems finite-size scaling

With the availabihty of computers, the transfer matrix method [14] emerged as an alternative and powerful technique for the study of cooperative phenomena of adsorbates resulting from interactions [15-17]. Quantities are calculated exactly on a semi-infinite lattice. Coupled with finite-size scaling towards the infinite lattice, the technique has proved popular for the determination of phase diagrams and critical-point properties of adsorbates [18-23] and magnetic spin systems [24—26], and further references therein. Application to other aspects of adsorbates, e.g., the calculation of desorption rates and heats of adsorption, has been more recent [27-30]. Sufficient accuracy can usually be obtained for the latter without scaling and essentially exact results are possible. In the following, we summarize the elementary but important aspects of the method to emphasize the ease of application. Further details can be found in the above references. [Pg.446]

This system was modelled in terms of the lattice gas with interactions shown in Fig. Ib. The phase diagram was first calculated by the transfer matrix finite size scaling technique for various choices of the interaction parameters [Pg.122]

The finite-size scaling theory combined with transfer matrix calculations had been, since the development of the phenomenological renormalization in 1976 by Nightingale [70], one of the most powerful tools to study critical phenomena in two-dimensional lattice models. For these models the partition function and all the physical quantities of the system (free energy, correlation length, response functions, etc) can be written as a function of the eigenvalues of the transfer matrix [71]. In particular, the free energy takes the form... [Pg.20]

The application of the finite size scaling analysis to the Monte Carlo simulation data for compressibility (performed for the two-dimensional Lennard-Lones lattice systems exhibiting the 1x2 ordered state) has shown [106] (see figure 7) that in the considered systems the order-disorder transition belongs to the universality class of two-dimensional Ising model with the critical exponents 7 = 1.75 and u = 1.0. [Pg.612]

From the classical literature on continuum theories of diffusion-reaction processes based on Eq. (4.1), it is anticipated that the larger the system size, the longer the time scale required for the reactive event, Eq. (4.2), to occur. The corresponding dependence for lattice systems was first proved analytically by Montroll and Weiss [17-19] who studied nearest-neighbor random walks on finite lattices of integral dimension subject to periodic boundary conditions. In a lattice-based approach to diffusion-controlled processes, one can also examine the influence of the number of pathways (or reaction channels) available to the diffusing coreactant at each point in the... [Pg.396]

The extension of Gillespie s algorithm to spatially distributed systems is straightforward. A lattice is used to represent binding sites of adsorbates, which correspond to local minima of the potential energy surface. The discrete nature of KMC coupled with possible separation of time scales of various processes could render KMC inefficient. The work of Bortz et al. on the n-fold or continuous time MC CTMC) method can lead to computational speedup of the KMC method, which, however, has been underutilized most probably because of its difficult implementation. This method classifies all atoms in a finite number of classes according to their transition probability. Probabilities are computed a priori and each event is successful, in contrast to the Metropolis method (and other null event algorithms) whose fraction of unsuccessful (null) events increases drastically at low temperatures and for stiff problems. In conjunction with efficient search within a class and dynamic variation of atom coordi-nates, " the CPU time can be practically independent of lattice size. After each event, the time is incremented by a continuous amount. [Pg.1718]

Particle methods (Molecular Dynamics, Dissipative Particle Dynamics, Multi-Particle Collision Dynamics) simulate a system of interacting mass points, and therefore thermal fluctuations are always present. The particles may have size and structure or they may be just point particles. In the former case, the finite solvent size results in an additional potential of mean force between the beads. The solvent structure extends over unphysically large length scales, because the proper separation of scale between solute and solvent is not computationally realizable. In dynamic simulations of systems in thermal equilibrium [43], solvent structure requires that the system be equilibrated with the solvent in place, whereas for a structureless solvent the solute system can be equilibrated by itself, with substantial computational savings [43]. Finally, lattice models have a (rigorously) known solvent viscosity, whereas for particle methods the existing analytical expressions are only approximations (which however usually work quite well). [Pg.98]


See other pages where Lattice systems finite-size scaling is mentioned: [Pg.370]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.77]   


SEARCH



Finite Systems

Finite system size

Finite-size

Finite-sized

Lattice size

Lattice system

Scale system

Size scaling

System size

© 2024 chempedia.info