Film development general-purpose developers

The most widely used developer in the world, Kodak D-76, fells under the category of general-purpose developers. D-76 was formulated in 1927 byj. G. Capstaff of Kodak as a black and white movie film developer. However, not long afterwards better movie-film developing formulas were introduced and D-76 found use as a still-film developer. Eventually, it became the standard by which to judge all other developers. It was not that D-76 was the best developer ever formulated. It was more that a standard was needed and D-76 had the best all-around compromise of sharpness to grain with a full tonal range from black to white. 

Adhesive price is dependent on development costs and volume requirements. Adhesives that have been specifically designed to be resistant to adverse environments are more expensive than general-purpose adhesives. Adhesive prices range from pennies a pound for inorganic and animal-based systems to hundreds of dollars per pound for certain heat-resistant synthetic adhesives. Adhesives in film or powder form require more processing than liquid or paste types and are more expensive. 

The situation did not change until 1942, soon after the start of World War II. At that time, a critical shortage of natural rubber developed because it was allocated chiefly for the war effort. Neoprene was chosen as a replacement for natural rubber in adhesives because it was the only other synthetic rubber available. Animal glue and other water-soluble materials available at the time were unsatisfactory because of their slow drying rates, poor adhesion to many surfaces, inflexible films, and rusting of metals. The two Neoprene polymers available at the time were Neoprene GN, a general purpose type, and Neoprene CG, a fast-crystallizing type. Both are copolymers of chloroprene and sulfur which contain a thiuram disulfide modifier. 

When chemical specificity is called for, a highly selective thin film is one solution. For analytes of major concern— Hg, trichloroethylene, Cr and certain organophosphonates— it may be worthwhile to use a complex, multistep procedure to synthesize a material that responds to a single analyte or narrow chemical class. In a few instances, very simple materials are quite selective for particular analytes examples include gold films to detect mercury (if sulfur compounds are not present to interfere) and palladium films for the detection of hydrogen (unsaturated hydrocarbons can interfere in this case). When such simple, obvious interfaces are unavailable or inadequate, scrutiny of the literature of interfacial chemistry, bulk-phase coordination chemistry, and catalysis (16) may point the way for the development of a tailored interface. But to utilize the one-analyte/one-(new)-film approach for general-purpose chemical detection systems, which could be called upon to recognize tens or hundreds of analytes in the presence of many interferants, is impractical, so alternatives must be examined. 

All the methods used to evaporate metals for atom synthesis were developed originally for the deposition of thin metal films. The more important of these techniques are shown schematically in Fig. la-d. Most of the evaporation devices can be scaled to give amounts of metal ranging from a few milligrams per hour for spectroscopic studies to 1-50 gm/hour for preparative synthetic purposes. Evaporation of metals from heated crucibles, boats, or wires (Fig. la-c) generally gives metal atoms in their ground electronic state. Electronic excitation of atoms is possible when metals are vaporized from arcs, by electron bombardment, or with a laser beam (Fig. Id). The lifetime of the excited states of... 

There have been few studies reported in the literature in the area of multi-component adsorption and desorption rate modeling (1, 2,3., 4,5. These have generally employed simplified modeling approaches, and the model predictions have provided qualitative comparisons to the experimental data. The purpose of this study is to develop a comprehensive model for multi-component adsorption kinetics based on the following mechanistic process (1) film diffusion of each species from the fluid phase to the solid surface (2) adsorption on the surface from the solute mixture and (3) diffusion of the individual solute species into the interior of the particle. The model is general in that diffusion rates in both fluid and solid phases are considered, and no restrictions are made regarding adsorption equilibrium relationships. However, diffusional flows due to solute-solute interactions are assumed to be zero in both fluid and solid phases. 

Generally, the barrier or rate-controlling films are more permeable to water than the carrier films. The materials used for this purpose consisted of a base, film forming water-soluble polymer in combination with at least one hydrophilic component such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose or polyvinylpyrrolidone. The polymers used were the same as those for the carrier films. Some recent developments are discussed herein. 

During the initial development period for most CVD processes, the selection of reactant species is quite simple Compounds commercially available for other purposes are considered. These include the traditional organometallic molecules MR, where M represents the metal of interest and R generally is restricted to methyl, ethyl, or other lower alkyl radicals. Several main group elements have volatile hydrides. Recently, unacceptable restrictions imposed on CVD processes by this limited range of precursors have reared their unsightly head, which has led to the development of a number of new source molecules. In this section, the structural motifs of some organometallic molecules are considered. A more detailed discussion of these concepts, as specifically applied to the CVD of metallic films, may be found in a VCH companion book, edited by Kodas and Hampden-Smith [2]. 

---